Creep, do you have anything to say about the actual topic of this thread? Do you think it is OK for Abbott to lie about Flannery because Flannery did not accurately predict when a drought would end?
Quote:Is this the same Tim Flannery that stated that due to global warming that we'd not have any rain again and that the dams would never get to be filled?
You tell me creep. It sounds like the sort of thing Abbott would want his followers to repeat mindlessly. If you want to know the truth, you should always start with what he actually said.
creep wrote on May 11
th, 2011 at 10:56pm:
mozzaok wrote on May 11
th, 2011 at 10:54pm:
Still waiting Creep.
I am not asking for Andrew Bolt's interpretations, where he tells you what "he thinks",Flannery has said, but actual links to Flannery making the claims that you have, seemingly falsely, attributed to him.
Once again it is a shame that you are unable to refer to the source that was quoted.
Shame that you have ignored Flannery's comments now that he has been proved wrong.
But you can keep your head in the sand, with the non-existant rains that we are having you won't have to worry about being drowned.
creep, you did not quote Flannery.
Quote:and at this rate 5.5 years gone by since 2007...Al Gore and the greens said devastation by 2013..oh sugar..
What about you cods - anything to say on the actual topic?
Quote:Apologise to Flannery?
The man has as much credibility as a Druid Soothsayer.
So why was Abbott lying about what he said chicken?
Quote:does anyone else notice when our friends from the hardleft get backed into a corner they start calling the libs names.....they will be sending Xmas cards next they seem to know us all.
Cods, accusing him of lying and asking for an apology is not the same as calling him names. It seems it is Abbott's supporters who feel backed into a corner, going by how desperate they are to change the topic and avoid quoting the man they are trying to bring down.
chicken_lipsforme wrote on May 12
th, 2011 at 7:10am:
____ wrote on May 12
th, 2011 at 6:51am:
chicken_lipsforme wrote on May 12
th, 2011 at 6:48am:
Apologise to Flannery?
The man has as much credibility as a Druid Soothsayer.
And they had a better prediction rate just by reading animals entrails.
So you support Abbott telling blatant lies
Far more than I could ever support Flannery's scaremongering and drivel.
The man's a scam artist.
The real question is will Flannery also buy a beachfront luxury $8.9 million villa in California.
Let me get this straight - you think it is OK for the opposition leader to lie to the public about what Flannery said because you think Flannery is a scaremonger?
Quote:I suspect Flannery might have more credibility if even just one of his predictions came true.
Perhaps then, media people like Andrew Bolt etc wouldn't hammer Flannery for his lack of credibility.
If Flannery is such an easy target, why do Bolt and the leader of the coalition have to lie about what he said?
Quote:The problem Astro isn't the media's way of reporting, or whether one 'likes' or trusts Andrew Bolt, it's Flannery and his wild statements.
Such as? So far none of Flannery's critics have actually quoted him.