Australian Politics Forum - Should Abbott apologise to Flannery?

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery?
Reply #210 - May 15^th, 2011 at 8:57pm

Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:55pm:

mozzaok wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:48pm:

Skeptics deserve, and receive my respect, denialist deserve, and receive nothing but contempt,

Lovely.

Tell us how you make the distinction.

Wrings hands while shuffling feet: sceptic. Looks you in the eye and says you are talking agit-prop crap: denialist.

DENIALISTS HAVE AN ATTITUDE FOR THEY ARE AT WAR!

NEXT! Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery? Reply #211 - May 15^th, 2011 at 9:01pm Gaaaawd! Not you??
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery? Reply #212 - May 15^th, 2011 at 9:05pm Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 9:01pm: Gaaaawd! Not you?? WAR MONGERS GET A HARD TIME IN THIS LIFE..... GET USED TO IT!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

mozzaok

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery?
Reply #213 - May 15^th, 2011 at 9:20pm

Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:55pm:

mozzaok wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:48pm:

Skeptics deserve, and receive my respect, denialist deserve, and receive nothing but contempt,

Lovely.

Tell us how you make the distinction.

Wrings hands while shuffling feet: sceptic. Looks you in the eye and says you are talking agit-prop crap: denialist.

It is easy, a skeptic makes a critical analysis of the evidence.

Back to top

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!

IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery? Reply #214 - May 15^th, 2011 at 9:22pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 9:05pm: Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 9:01pm: Gaaaawd! Not you?? WAR MONGERS GET A HARD TIME IN THIS LIFE..... GET USED TO IT! "Get used to the having te sh!t annoyed out of you" - said the laxative to the sensible man. The times we live in.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery?
Reply #215 - May 15^th, 2011 at 9:40pm

Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 9:22pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 9:05pm:

Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 9:01pm:

Gaaaawd! Not you??

WAR MONGERS GET A HARD TIME IN THIS LIFE..... GET USED TO IT! Cheesy

"Get used to the having te sh!t annoyed out of you" - said the laxative to the sensible man.

The times we live in.

WE ALL LOVE OUR FRUITLOOPS MATE... DON'T EVER LEAVE WILL YA MATE!!??!! Wink

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery? Reply #216 - May 15^th, 2011 at 9:58pm I'd leave only to annoy the sh!t out of you, mate. Vengence will be mine!!
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery? Reply #217 - May 15^th, 2011 at 10:26pm Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 9:58pm: I'd leave only to annoy the sh!t out of you, mate. Vengence will be mine!! Still hiding that nasty attitude behind American made Nuclear machoism ay?!!?
Back to top	« Last Edit: May 15^th, 2011 at 11:41pm by BatteriesNotIncluded » Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

astro_surf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2981

Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery?
Reply #218 - May 15^th, 2011 at 11:35pm

Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:55pm:

mozzaok wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:48pm:

Skeptics deserve, and receive my respect, denialist deserve, and receive nothing but contempt,

Lovely.

Tell us how you make the distinction.

Wrings hands while shuffling feet: sceptic. Looks you in the eye and says you are talking agit-prop crap: denialist.

No. A sceptic accepts the weight of the evidence until some other line of evidence contradicts it. Feel free to offer some contradictory evidence, until then STFU or accept the fact that you're a denier.

Back to top

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Sep 11^th, 2011 at 11:23am:

So tell me, you'd like to see more and more craphouse coloured people in Australia right?&&Yeah good idea moron.&&

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery?
Reply #219 - May 16^th, 2011 at 9:11am

this planet is traversing our sun

solar maximum solar minimum 365 days 1 year

[1 cycle]

further

the solar system is traversing the central sun alcione 26,000 years

[1 cycle]

some 'scientists' find a way to manipulate data proven on record

leaked emails mistruths about incorrect and manipulated data toward

the assertion that man makes climate change?

so they can make money off of a natural cyclical position of being

regarding the earths point in linear time in the 3rd dimension

re: pyhsical universe

the only constant is change

the earth will never stay the same

it is always evolving

the powers that were refuse to release the free energy and tax

to the eyeballs the combustion engine and the fuels that power this

your time is overwith

you have had you chances and your power is gone

all is in accordance with the divine plan

all the data mearly reflects a natural change regarding temperatures

and solar maxima/minima

you may believe as you do so wish

all satanic freemasonics will be departing very soon...trust you've had

fun,

you will be going unto that which you have invoked

you may take this forgiveness with you on your travels

namaste

-:)

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery?
Reply #220 - May 16^th, 2011 at 9:18am

this mother earth has always been evolving

should we have been paying to pollute for millenia?

further

why pay any tax to these satanic despots?

when you pay a carbon tax this allows big business to

pay to pollute..when you allow this they pollute even moreso and

give fiat useless no gold standard toilet paper with no real value

to do so...

further yet still

ALL NUCLEAR WASTE will be comming to OZ

beacuse we have a carbon tax they will pay the money

[useless fiat paper money no gold standard]

yes that right

they will pay the money and australia will be obligated to

bury this toxic and hazardous nuclear and further waste deep

into gandwannaland soiling the artesian basin and fouling the

spring waters

you satanics are on notice

this will be prevented from happening

all is in accordance with the divine plan

for i am here to validate that we are here yes

human angels

and we do not allow such non sense to happen on our watch

does this comfort you beloveds?

the disinformationalistical conspiracy theoretique' snake oil

salesmen like astro will be dismissed very soon..

you will go unto that which you do invoke dear one

with forgiveness yes

as the meek inherite this earth

happy trails

namaste

-:)

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery? Reply #221 - May 16^th, 2011 at 9:57am astro_surf wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 11:35pm: until then STFU or accept the fact that you're a denier. The hoof is showing. Lefties want conservatives to shut up, conservatives want lefties to keep talking.
Back to top	IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery?
Reply #222 - May 16^th, 2011 at 10:08am

astro_surf wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 11:35pm:

Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:55pm:

mozzaok wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:48pm:

Skeptics deserve, and receive my respect, denialist deserve, and receive nothing but contempt,

Lovely.

Tell us how you make the distinction.

Wrings hands while shuffling feet: sceptic. Looks you in the eye and says you are talking agit-prop crap: denialist.

No. A sceptic accepts the weight of the evidence until some other line of evidence contradicts it. Feel free to offer some contradictory evidence, until then STFU or accept the fact that you're a denier.

Is a person who believes that scientists have fudged figures, made their peer-review system look shonky and cant trust scientists until they prove themselves :-

a skeptic
a denier

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery?
Reply #223 - May 16^th, 2011 at 10:19am

mozzaok wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 9:20pm:

Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:55pm:

mozzaok wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:48pm:

Skeptics deserve, and receive my respect, denialist deserve, and receive nothing but contempt,

Lovely.

Tell us how you make the distinction.

Wrings hands while shuffling feet: sceptic. Looks you in the eye and says you are talking agit-prop crap: denialist.

It is easy, a skeptic makes a critical analysis of the evidence.

Excellent. Can you give us one scientific publication that that provided the evidence that convinced you personally? No, you can't. You rely on popularisers like most of the rest of us.

Back to top

IP Logged

chicken_lipsforme

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male

Re: Should Abbott apologise to Flannery?
Reply #224 - May 16^th, 2011 at 11:50am

mozzaok wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 9:20pm:

Soren wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:55pm:

mozzaok wrote on May 15^th, 2011 at 8:48pm:

Skeptics deserve, and receive my respect, denialist deserve, and receive nothing but contempt,

Lovely.

Tell us how you make the distinction.

Wrings hands while shuffling feet: sceptic. Looks you in the eye and says you are talking agit-prop crap: denialist.

It is easy, a skeptic makes a critical analysis of the evidence.

And they are particularly critical when the 'evidence' has been extrapolated based initially on a guess. Cool

Back to top

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.

IP Logged