Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out? (Read 7952 times)
Captainjcook
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5
Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Mar 20th, 2011 at 7:33pm
 
The proportion of Aboriginal adults married (de facto or de jure) to non-Aboriginal spouses was 69% according to the 2001 census, up from 46% in 1986. The census figures show there were more intermixed Aboriginal couples in capital cities: 87% in 2001 compared to 60% in rural and regional Australia.

At the 2006 census, 31% of aborigines lived in major cities and another 45% in or close to rural towns, a major increase compared with 46% living in urban areas in 1971, with the trend towards intermix set to continue.

When Captain Arthur Phillip stepped ashore at Sydney Cove, most authorities place the Aboriginal population of Australia at between 250,000 and 300,000. The last accurate census on the number of full blooded Aborigines was in 1961; today the number may be no more than 30,000 out of a total “Indigenous” population of 517,200.

Based on current estimates, is it more likely than not that the dysgenic traits carried by Australian aborigines and nature will see to their demise as an ethnic minority on the Australian continent?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Big Donger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102395
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #1 - Mar 20th, 2011 at 8:54pm
 
I don't think the census has the category of "intermixed," CJC. It's either Aboriginal or not.

Could you explain the term "dysgenic"?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captainjcook
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #2 - Mar 20th, 2011 at 8:58pm
 
The last census on the number of full bloods was in 1961. But the intermarriage rate is recorded. So we can extrapolate the figure for the current number of full bloods. About 30,000.

Dysgenic traits are those that disappear with interbreeding.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Big Donger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102395
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #3 - Mar 21st, 2011 at 2:18am
 
Thanks, Captain Cook. I have no doubt that "full blood" Aboriginals are on the wane. However, I've heard that "half-castes", "quarter-castes" and "octoroons" are on the rise. Whether this is due to breeding or an increase in the number of people identifying as Aboriginals is another question.

After all, the census is a questionnaire, and not a medical examination. We can extrapolate how people identify themselves from a census, but not their racial characteristics.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
DILLIGAF
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1259
The greens are red
Gender: male
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #4 - Mar 30th, 2011 at 1:26am
 
Something should be done to preserve their race in its purity.
Back to top
 

Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&&
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #5 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 10:38am
 
DILLIGAF wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 1:26am:
Something should be done to preserve their race in its purity.


Not pimping their pre-pubescent girls for booze would be a good start.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6141
Gender: male
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #6 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 10:55am
 
No chance of them breeding thamselves out while there's money to be made.
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Blasko
Junior Member
**
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 81
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #7 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 4:09pm
 
Quote:
When Captain Arthur Phillip stepped ashore at Sydney Cove, most authorities place the Aboriginal population of Australia at between 250,000 and 300,000.


I've heard double that number.

We're all mongrels anyway. Racial purity nonsense is just that, nonsense.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captainjcook
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #8 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 4:33pm
 
I got that figure from Rodney Liddell's "The Savage Frontier". Whatever it was then, a full blood population of 30,000 now seems about right if the intermarriage rate has reached 69%.

But with respect to the future, what about aboriginal DNA?

If there any possible way it will survive?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captainjcook
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #9 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 5:08pm
 
Or should have I said traits.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Blasko
Junior Member
**
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 81
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #10 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 7:41pm
 
Captainjcook wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 4:33pm:
I got that figure from Rodney Liddell's "The Savage Frontier".
Never heard of him, and no wonder. Ten seconds of googling shows he's literally a nobody and sold his books from his home in a caravan park. Claims that Aboriginals came over from Sri Lanka or thereabouts only a thousand years ago. Random crazy dudes are a dime a plenty in this world. I recommend sticking to academics.

FYI, scientists agree that the ancestors of Aboriginals came to Australia over at least 40,000 years ago.

Captainjcook wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 4:33pm:
Whatever it was then, a full blood population of 30,000 now seems about right if the intermarriage rate has reached 69%.

But with respect to the future, what about aboriginal DNA?

If there any possible way it will survive?
What are Aboriginal traits?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captainjcook
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #11 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 8:12pm
 
The current estimate of the number of full bloods is 30,000 whatever the estimate of the number in 1788 was.

Someone told me that after about 4 generations of intermarriage you need to be highly qualified to tell them apart.

Andrew Bolt is right: it seems white is the new black in Australia.


p.s. With regards to Mr Liddell, it is interesting that Boomerangs as he says are not distinctively Australian.

Look up "Tutankhamun Boomerang".
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Blasko
Junior Member
**
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 81
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #12 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 8:36pm
 
Captainjcook wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 8:12pm:
The current estimate of the number of full bloods is 30,000 whatever the estimate of the number in 1788 was.
What's the definition of a full blood again?

Captainjcook wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 8:12pm:
Someone told me that after about 4 generations of intermarriage you need to be highly qualified to tell them apart.
Can we still call them Aboriginals if they don't 'look' Aboriginal? Personally I'm not prepared to say that you're only an Aboriginal if you look black. I mean Cathy Freeman is pretty dark, but she's not as dark as people once were.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Vixtory1001
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3
Re: Will Australian aborigines breed themselves out?
Reply #13 - Apr 2nd, 2011 at 1:22am
 
Captainjcook wrote on Mar 20th, 2011 at 7:33pm:
The proportion of Aboriginal adults married (de facto or de jure) to non-Aboriginal spouses was 69% according to the 2001 census, up from 46% in 1986. The census figures show there were more intermixed Aboriginal couples in capital cities: 87% in 2001 compared to 60% in rural and regional Australia.

At the 2006 census, 31% of aborigines lived in major cities and another 45% in or close to rural towns, a major increase compared with 46% living in urban areas in 1971, with the trend towards intermix set to continue.

When Captain Arthur Phillip stepped ashore at Sydney Cove, most authorities place the Aboriginal population of Australia at between 250,000 and 300,000. The last accurate census on the number of full blooded Aborigines was in 1961; today the number may be no more than 30,000 out of a total “Indigenous” population of 517,200.

Based on current estimates, is it more likely than not that the dysgenic traits carried by Australian aborigines and nature will see to their demise as an ethnic minority on the Australian continent?

How can the aborignes breed themselves out when its has always been white people that fear genetic destruction. In fact I look at the system of racism having come into being because the white population recognized, after they went around the world, that they were a tiny minority on the planet. They realized that they could be genetically annihilated and white people could disappear. So white people worked out a system for white survival, which entails dominating all of the black, brown, red and yellow people on the planet.

Since the practice of racism is the practice of WHITE GENETIC SURVIVAL the expectation that white people can change this behaviour is a high level expectation. White people are playing a white genetic survival game which has to inferiorize the functioning of black and other people of color.

Thus people of color (who are most capable of producing white genetic annihilation) have to be subdued, oppressed, suppressed, or indoctrinated to support an infrastructure which does not lend itself to our survival, but instead, to the survival of white genetics. White people’s mania to suntan and the new chemical and genetic techniques that they are developing to allow people to have skin coloration is evidence that they feel at deep subconscious levels that something is missing and something is wrong. At the same time you have mass murder on the continent of africa of Black people, domination of the indigenous aboriginal population in Oz.


You have white supremacy through HIV/AIDS killing tens of millions of people on the continent of Africa. And now you have World war 3 in the middle east. If all of the resources are in the areas of the world where non-white people are, then people who classify themselves as White can go in and take those resources. They set up whatever pretense is needed to justify going in and taking control over those resources. The non-white people are not supposed to have any means to protect and defend themselves from this ultimate aggression.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print