Amadd wrote on Jul 19
th, 2011 at 7:51am:
Quote:Well - I think - and have for a while, that such drug-testing 'policies' are suspect- albeit a claim that its in the interests of public safety. Shite!
I have never faced such a situation in a workplace - ... and do not think it efficacious for the better running of any enterprise.!
Good point.
I can't think offhand of any situation where I have felt my personal safety to be compromised because of this "mythical" illegal drug problem within the workplace.
Alcohol ..yes I've seen it a few times. Other drugs..no.
Notwithstanding the fact that any threat to workplace safety that I have seen due to alcohol is primarily noticed and dealt with first through the workplace community.
If there were any
real problems with drugs in the workplace, I have no doubt that they would also first be dealt with within the workplace community.
Ridiculous, ineffective, insulting drugs tests are a blight on privacy and freedom, and also an insult to the
real effectiveness of what a "quiet word" from a trusted colleague might bring.
The message, of course, is to not trust in your pissy little communities.
BB has bigger and better plans for you.
I can certainly sympathise ammad, as the more "responsible" drug users have to try and avoid the snares set to catch the irresponsible, but to pretend that there are not a great many irresponsible users is pretty dubious.
I have had enough experience to consider myself at least as qualified as any person I know of to make that judgement call, so rather than blaming society for protecting itself, blame the dropkicks who obviate that need, by doing the wrong thing at the wrong time.
Note, also, that the responsible users will be the older users, and unless they give rise to suspicion through their behaviour, then they are unlikely to be targeted, and would need to be a bit unlucky to get randomly tested.