Australian Politics Forum - Goverments & CBAs

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #135 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:16am

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:13am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:03am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 8:17pm:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 2:20pm:

The point I`d like to make is. Whether CBA`s have been done before or not is totally irrelevant, and to harp on about prior Government projects in this vein is nothing more than declared stupidity. The use of this "tactic" in debate is exactly equal to declaring that one is too stupid to continue the debate, and needs to stall all inteligent discourse.

To request a CBA ofr a project of the magnitude of the proposed NBN is reasonable and sensible. To oppose a CBA on this project is an admission of shonky practice.

exactly.
Especially given the ALP's pathetic history in the last 3 years of shonkiness and rorts. Together with the ALP's massive over spending (eg BER, pink batts)

Only a complete twit would give Julia Gillard's NBN the green light without a CBA.

Let's pretend the CBA was done. Considering how subjective CBA's actually are, what would it need to say for you to get over it and accept this is a good project?

And the whole point as to why the question of other CBAs performed by other governments has been arked on so much about was because Miss Anne decided she would point out all other governments did one, without offering a source. Then she hid. Bravo.

LOL

Let's play pretendies huh.
LOL

Oh nice new nick too there greeny LOL

Darling, check my profile to see just how new my nick is.

And not pretendies... let's hypothesise because I am really curious as to what you'd like to see in the CBA to give you rest of mind that this is a good project. You continue to harp on about it. Surely you're not just singing the liberal tune here? Surely you want a CBA because you want some specific issues being played around in your mind resolved?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

aussiefree2ride

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3538

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #136 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:26am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:07am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:03am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 8:17pm:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 2:20pm:

The point I`d like to make is. Whether CBA`s have been done before or not is totally irrelevant, and to harp on about prior Government projects in this vein is nothing more than declared stupidity. The use of this "tactic" in debate is exactly equal to declaring that one is too stupid to continue the debate, and needs to stall all inteligent discourse.

To request a CBA ofr a project of the magnitude of the proposed NBN is reasonable and sensible. To oppose a CBA on this project is an admission of shonky practice.

exactly.
Especially given the ALP's pathetic history in the last 3 years of shonkiness and rorts. Together with the ALP's massive over spending (eg BER, pink batts)

Only a complete twit would give Julia Gillard's NBN the green light without a CBA.

Let's pretend the CBA was done. Considering how subjective CBA's actually are, what would it need to say for you to get over it and accept this is a good project?

got nothing I see? Now there is a great "tactic"

I think it`s fair to reply to nothing with nothing.

Back to top

IP Logged

John S Gold Member Offline Fascist Party = Liberal Party Posts: 3691 Gender:	Re: Goverments & CBAs Reply #137 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:28am the Federal Goverment gave $1 million to Queesland flood appeal yesterday. All you liberals are saying that all goverment project has had a CBA done. I wonder if this one did as well?
Back to top	'The worst Labor Government is always better then the best Liberal government for Australians workers' IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #138 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:29am

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:07am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:03am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 8:17pm:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 2:20pm:

The point I`d like to make is. Whether CBA`s have been done before or not is totally irrelevant, and to harp on about prior Government projects in this vein is nothing more than declared stupidity. The use of this "tactic" in debate is exactly equal to declaring that one is too stupid to continue the debate, and needs to stall all inteligent discourse.

To request a CBA ofr a project of the magnitude of the proposed NBN is reasonable and sensible. To oppose a CBA on this project is an admission of shonky practice.

exactly.
Especially given the ALP's pathetic history in the last 3 years of shonkiness and rorts. Together with the ALP's massive over spending (eg BER, pink batts)

Only a complete twit would give Julia Gillard's NBN the green light without a CBA.

Let's pretend the CBA was done. Considering how subjective CBA's actually are, what would it need to say for you to get over it and accept this is a good project?

got nothing I see? Now there is a great "tactic"

I think it`s fair to reply to nothing with nothing.

Didn't realise we were in 5th grade Wink

I hope that 2011 brings you a little growth and enables you to express your own opinions rather than follow Abbott like a little white sheep.

Perhaps he'll release a statement with what he wants to see in a CBA, and then you'll have yourself something to say.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Miss Anne Dryst

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2296
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #139 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:30am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:16am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:13am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:03am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 8:17pm:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 2:20pm:

The point I`d like to make is. Whether CBA`s have been done before or not is totally irrelevant, and to harp on about prior Government projects in this vein is nothing more than declared stupidity. The use of this "tactic" in debate is exactly equal to declaring that one is too stupid to continue the debate, and needs to stall all inteligent discourse.

To request a CBA ofr a project of the magnitude of the proposed NBN is reasonable and sensible. To oppose a CBA on this project is an admission of shonky practice.

exactly.
Especially given the ALP's pathetic history in the last 3 years of shonkiness and rorts. Together with the ALP's massive over spending (eg BER, pink batts)

Only a complete twit would give Julia Gillard's NBN the green light without a CBA.

Let's pretend the CBA was done. Considering how subjective CBA's actually are, what would it need to say for you to get over it and accept this is a good project?

And the whole point as to why the question of other CBAs performed by other governments has been arked on so much about was because Miss Anne decided she would point out all other governments did one, without offering a source. Then she hid. Bravo.

LOL

Let's play pretendies huh.
LOL

Oh nice new nick too there greeny LOL

Darling, check my profile to see just how new my nick is.

And not pretendies... let's hypothesise because I am really curious as to what you'd like to see in the CBA to give you rest of mind that this is a good project. You continue to harp on about it. Surely you're not just singing the liberal tune here? Surely you want a CBA because you want some specific issues being played around in your mind resolved?

Awww so you got found out there with your new nick.
Never mind, you can always go back to playing pretendies. Like pretend that no one found you out.
LOL

Back to top

It's hard to soar like an eagle when conversing with turkeys

IP Logged

aussiefree2ride

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3538

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #140 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:31am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:29am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:07am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:03am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 8:17pm:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 2:20pm:

The point I`d like to make is. Whether CBA`s have been done before or not is totally irrelevant, and to harp on about prior Government projects in this vein is nothing more than declared stupidity. The use of this "tactic" in debate is exactly equal to declaring that one is too stupid to continue the debate, and needs to stall all inteligent discourse.

To request a CBA ofr a project of the magnitude of the proposed NBN is reasonable and sensible. To oppose a CBA on this project is an admission of shonky practice.

exactly.
Especially given the ALP's pathetic history in the last 3 years of shonkiness and rorts. Together with the ALP's massive over spending (eg BER, pink batts)

Only a complete twit would give Julia Gillard's NBN the green light without a CBA.

Let's pretend the CBA was done. Considering how subjective CBA's actually are, what would it need to say for you to get over it and accept this is a good project?

got nothing I see? Now there is a great "tactic"

I think it`s fair to reply to nothing with nothing.

Didn't realise we were in 5th grade Wink

I hope that 2011 brings you a little growth and enables you to express your own opinions rather than follow Abbott like a little white sheep.

Perhaps he'll release a statement with what he wants to see in a CBA, and then you'll have yourself something to say.

5th Grade? Or as Australians say, grade 5. Most children have grown out of "pretendies" games by grade 5.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #141 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:33am

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:31am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:29am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:07am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:03am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 8:17pm:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 2:20pm:

The point I`d like to make is. Whether CBA`s have been done before or not is totally irrelevant, and to harp on about prior Government projects in this vein is nothing more than declared stupidity. The use of this "tactic" in debate is exactly equal to declaring that one is too stupid to continue the debate, and needs to stall all inteligent discourse.

To request a CBA ofr a project of the magnitude of the proposed NBN is reasonable and sensible. To oppose a CBA on this project is an admission of shonky practice.

exactly.
Especially given the ALP's pathetic history in the last 3 years of shonkiness and rorts. Together with the ALP's massive over spending (eg BER, pink batts)

Only a complete twit would give Julia Gillard's NBN the green light without a CBA.

Let's pretend the CBA was done. Considering how subjective CBA's actually are, what would it need to say for you to get over it and accept this is a good project?

got nothing I see? Now there is a great "tactic"

I think it`s fair to reply to nothing with nothing.

Didn't realise we were in 5th grade Wink

I hope that 2011 brings you a little growth and enables you to express your own opinions rather than follow Abbott like a little white sheep.

Perhaps he'll release a statement with what he wants to see in a CBA, and then you'll have yourself something to say.

5th Grade? Or as Australians say, grade 5. Most children have grown out of "pretendies" games by grade 5.

Hence I ask you if you are in 5th grade. Are you? Or have I gone too high in my guess?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #142 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:34am

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:30am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:16am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:13am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:03am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 8:17pm:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 2:20pm:

The point I`d like to make is. Whether CBA`s have been done before or not is totally irrelevant, and to harp on about prior Government projects in this vein is nothing more than declared stupidity. The use of this "tactic" in debate is exactly equal to declaring that one is too stupid to continue the debate, and needs to stall all inteligent discourse.

To request a CBA ofr a project of the magnitude of the proposed NBN is reasonable and sensible. To oppose a CBA on this project is an admission of shonky practice.

exactly.
Especially given the ALP's pathetic history in the last 3 years of shonkiness and rorts. Together with the ALP's massive over spending (eg BER, pink batts)

Only a complete twit would give Julia Gillard's NBN the green light without a CBA.

Let's pretend the CBA was done. Considering how subjective CBA's actually are, what would it need to say for you to get over it and accept this is a good project?

And the whole point as to why the question of other CBAs performed by other governments has been arked on so much about was because Miss Anne decided she would point out all other governments did one, without offering a source. Then she hid. Bravo.

LOL

Let's play pretendies huh.
LOL

Oh nice new nick too there greeny LOL

Darling, check my profile to see just how new my nick is.

And not pretendies... let's hypothesise because I am really curious as to what you'd like to see in the CBA to give you rest of mind that this is a good project. You continue to harp on about it. Surely you're not just singing the liberal tune here? Surely you want a CBA because you want some specific issues being played around in your mind resolved?

Awww so you got found out there with your new nick.
Never mind, you can always go back to playing pretendies. Like pretend that no one found you out.
LOL

So, do you have an answer yet? Or are you going to hide again until someone comes up with an opinion for you?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Miss Anne Dryst

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2296
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #143 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:35am

John S wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:28am:

the Federal Goverment gave $1 million to Queesland flood appeal yesterday.

All you liberals are saying that all goverment project has had a CBA done.

I wonder if this one did as well?

Grin

Are you suggesting that donations should be analysed?

Do you understand what a donation is?
Do you understand what flood relief is?

Back to top

It's hard to soar like an eagle when conversing with turkeys

IP Logged

skippy. Gold Member Offline Posts: 20882 Gender:	Re: Goverments & CBAs Reply #144 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:36am goldfish doesn't give answers to questions which show up her lack of understanding.
Back to top	freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL Click onWWW below IP Logged

Miss Anne Dryst

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2296
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #145 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:37am

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:31am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:29am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:07am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:03am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 8:17pm:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 2:20pm:

The point I`d like to make is. Whether CBA`s have been done before or not is totally irrelevant, and to harp on about prior Government projects in this vein is nothing more than declared stupidity. The use of this "tactic" in debate is exactly equal to declaring that one is too stupid to continue the debate, and needs to stall all inteligent discourse.

To request a CBA ofr a project of the magnitude of the proposed NBN is reasonable and sensible. To oppose a CBA on this project is an admission of shonky practice.

exactly.
Especially given the ALP's pathetic history in the last 3 years of shonkiness and rorts. Together with the ALP's massive over spending (eg BER, pink batts)

Only a complete twit would give Julia Gillard's NBN the green light without a CBA.

Let's pretend the CBA was done. Considering how subjective CBA's actually are, what would it need to say for you to get over it and accept this is a good project?

got nothing I see? Now there is a great "tactic"

I think it`s fair to reply to nothing with nothing.

Didn't realise we were in 5th grade Wink

I hope that 2011 brings you a little growth and enables you to express your own opinions rather than follow Abbott like a little white sheep.

Perhaps he'll release a statement with what he wants to see in a CBA, and then you'll have yourself something to say.

5th Grade? Or as Australians say, grade 5. Most children have grown out of "pretendies" games by grade 5.

It really is a sad pathetic loser who has to create a new nick to support their own opinion.

I wonder if pretendy boy also has invisible friends.

Back to top

It's hard to soar like an eagle when conversing with turkeys

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23619 Gender:	Re: Goverments & CBAs Reply #146 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:37am skippy. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:36am: goldfish doesn't give answers to questions which show up her lack of understanding. She should just hide then. Perhaps we should buy her a nice rock as a late christmas present
Back to top	Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of. IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #147 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:38am

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:37am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:31am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:29am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:26am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:07am:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:03am:

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 8:17pm:

aussiefree2ride wrote on Dec 29^th, 2010 at 2:20pm:

The point I`d like to make is. Whether CBA`s have been done before or not is totally irrelevant, and to harp on about prior Government projects in this vein is nothing more than declared stupidity. The use of this "tactic" in debate is exactly equal to declaring that one is too stupid to continue the debate, and needs to stall all inteligent discourse.

To request a CBA ofr a project of the magnitude of the proposed NBN is reasonable and sensible. To oppose a CBA on this project is an admission of shonky practice.

exactly.
Especially given the ALP's pathetic history in the last 3 years of shonkiness and rorts. Together with the ALP's massive over spending (eg BER, pink batts)

Only a complete twit would give Julia Gillard's NBN the green light without a CBA.

Let's pretend the CBA was done. Considering how subjective CBA's actually are, what would it need to say for you to get over it and accept this is a good project?

got nothing I see? Now there is a great "tactic"

I think it`s fair to reply to nothing with nothing.

Didn't realise we were in 5th grade Wink

I hope that 2011 brings you a little growth and enables you to express your own opinions rather than follow Abbott like a little white sheep.

Perhaps he'll release a statement with what he wants to see in a CBA, and then you'll have yourself something to say.

5th Grade? Or as Australians say, grade 5. Most children have grown out of "pretendies" games by grade 5.

It really is a sad pathetic loser who has to create a new nick to support their own opinion.

I wonder if pretendy boy also has invisible friends.

Hey BTW, what would you like to see in the CBA that will put your mind at ease in regard to the NBN?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #148 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:40am

Miss Anne Dryst wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:35am:

John S wrote on Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:28am:

the Federal Goverment gave $1 million to Queesland flood appeal yesterday.

All you liberals are saying that all goverment project has had a CBA done.

I wonder if this one did as well?

Grin

Are you suggesting that donations should be analysed?

Do you understand what a donation is?
Do you understand what flood relief is?

Do YOU know what a donation is?
Do YOU know what flood relief is?
Do YOU know what a CBA is?
Do YOU know what 5x5 is? Ooh..let's try something easier: Do YOU know what 1x5 is?

PS: Donations and the amount of donation are analysed. Not a CBA, but an analysis to determine how much. Der.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:46am by sir prince duke alevine »

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Goverments & CBAs
Reply #149 - Dec 30^th, 2010 at 8:48am

Would one of you neo cons post up a CBA, from either party.
goldfish is very confused,so whats new, with a COST BENIFIT ANALYSIS and party policies which are always put up for analysis. We all remember the Liberal party policy costings from the last election, it is the main reason they are not in gov today, the independents could not support something that was out by so many billions of dollars.
But that was not a CBA, goldfish, post up a CBA, mel lies,then you wont look like such a lying sock.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Should the Goverment of the day do a CBA on their Policies
Yes all Goverment 5 (38.5%) Not any Goverment 2 (15.4%) Only the Labor Goverments 0 (0.0%) Not any Liberal Goverments 0 (0.0%) Goverment doing CBA is all B/S 6 (46.2%) Total votes: 13 « Created by: John S on: Dec 27^th, 2010 at 10:50am »