Dsmithy70 wrote on Dec 13
th, 2010 at 2:33pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Dec 13
th, 2010 at 2:24pm:
The problem is Dsmithy...it's BIG 'if'...
Really???
So we advance our energy technology instead of continuing to use 19th century technology & a finite resource & the science is wrong,
Would you consider it a waste of money????
I mean imagine no more smog, gee I'd miss that.
Can you name 1 other area of human endeavour where new technology is a bad thing, and actively DISCOURAGED by governments?
Imagine if they decided a sharp knife was all the medical equipment needed, that's basically what we're allowing the vested interests of the fossil fuel lobby to do.
Nope, I'm all the way behind advancing technology, and alternative power, and better medical knowledge etc....
What I'm NOT behind is a pointless tax (fine) like a Carbon Tax or an ETS which will do nothing other than pass the tax 'costs' on to all consumers, and have NO effect on either Climate Change, or the development of alternative/renewable energy.....and will, if we follow the UN's idea of paying money to developing nations, only serve to produce more of the 'allegedly' harmful Co2 emissions....
If we want to help developing nations and the poor people living in them, it'd be a far better idea to give them, not money, but technology.
Send people there to build renewable energy infrastructure and industry and train the local people on how to build more....