Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
What happened to 2020? (Read 8761 times)
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #60 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:30am
 
Soren wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:02am:
Quote:
Given, of course, that there's sufficient water and sufficient nitrogen and that is what we're seeing here.




Well of course that's what they're seeing here. They're providing it with adequate water and fertiliser, you ....philosopher.

Just so that you understand - I didn't imply that there could be a shortage of water and fertiliser right at this very moment in time.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #61 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:43am
 
Soren wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:02am:
Do you think that having more wheat is like jumping off a tall building? Your analogies are consistetly off the wall (!)



My God, was that an analogy I gave? I had no idea. Let me try to make my point abundantly clear:

Life is easy,
as long as you don't get out of bed.


Motoring is safe,
as long as you don't start the engine.

Marijuana will not affect your judgement,
as long as you don't inhale.


Jumping off a building is fun!....
as long as you don't hit the ground.


Crops will produce higher yields in elevated CO2 atmospheres,
as long as you don't heat stress them, deprive them of moisture and deprive them of nutrients.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #62 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:57am
 
muso wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:30am:
Soren wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:02am:
Quote:
Given, of course, that there's sufficient water and sufficient nitrogen and that is what we're seeing here.




Well of course that's what they're seeing here. They're providing it with adequate water and fertiliser, you ....philosopher.

Just so that you understand - I didn't imply that there could be a shortage of water and fertiliser right at this very moment in time.



Scientists run computer simulations full of assumptions about of half-undrestood phenomena - boffin says it's all good, they are keepin' it real.
Scientists run a variety of field experiments to show that increased CO2 is actually a GOOD THING for crop yields - boffin gets testy and discovers all the ifs and buts he accidentally misplaced when the computer simultions were discussed.

Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #63 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 11:13am
 
Soren wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 10:57am:
Scientists run computer simulations full of assumptions about of half-undrestood phenomena - boffin says it's all good, they are keepin' it real. (Is that what they said?)
Scientists run a variety of field experiments to show that increased CO2 is actually a GOOD THING for crop yields - boffin gets testy and discovers all the ifs and buts he accidentally misplaced when the computer simultions were discussed.

Roll Eyes


Those dastardly scientific researchers.

Your philosopher mind games will not work here.  In essence, let's substitute Marijuana in your argument and see if it makes sense:

Quote:
Toxicologists run computer simulations full of assumptions about of half-undrestood phenomena - boffin says it's all good, they are keepin' it real.
Toxicologists run a variety of field experiments to show that increased marijuana has no effects on judgement - boffin gets testy and discovers all the ifs and buts he accidentally misplaced (the fact that the subjects didn't inhale) when the computer simultions were discussed.



Sigmund Freud (peering over half moon glasses): Zo tell me Mr Soren, ven vas it zat you first started thinking zat climatologists und agronomy researchers vere ze same? Hmmmmm Ven you vere a childt, did you er... valk into your parents bedroom and catch your mother vith a scientist? hmmmmm ?
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #64 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 2:35pm
 
Yeah, guud wan. Who ya gonna believe? Your East Anglia computer simulation or your lying eyes looking at actual experiments? Well, the computer, of course! It's a peer reviewed computer.


And that Freud sketch  - unsurprisingly irrelevant to any part of the discussion.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #65 - Dec 15th, 2010 at 3:25pm
 
Soren wrote on Dec 15th, 2010 at 2:35pm:
Yeah, guud wan. Who ya gonna believe? Your East Anglia computer simulation or your lying eyes looking at actual experiments? Well, the computer, of course! It's a peer reviewed computer.

And that Freud sketch  - unsurprisingly irrelevant to any part of the discussion.



Soren, I don't think you're being deliberately obtuse here, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

The agronomy experiment was looking at one variable - the CO2 content - Ok?  The CO2 level approximates what it will be in 2050 based on a particular emission scenario.

It does not give indications of trends in seasonal temperatures or rainfall by 2050. If you are trying to imply that the agronomy experiment was ever designed to do that, then you are sadly deluded.

Now it's true that we could irrigate a greater proportion of our wheat. We already apply fertiliser, so the nutrient levels are less of a concern. The main variable is temperature, and if the average temperature shifts, it implies that the maximum temperatures shifts too. What happens when you get an extended hot period, is that the yields drop enormously.  It becomes academic whether you can get increased yields due to the CO2 content or not. It's not an important consideration in the scheme of things.

Here's a link to one effect of heat stress:

http://www.ypct.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8047:heat-st...

Quote:
When a high temperature event occurs at the very sensitive stage of development there’s a window of two to three weeks around flowering when the maximum damage will occur.

“The other factor which will affect heat stress is how much water is in the soil profile. If there’s plenty of water in the soil profile the plant can keep its leaves 2 to 4 degrees Celsius lower than the air temperature, but if there’s not enough water in the soil profile the leaves can be up to 4C higher than the air temperature.


Apart from that, you're looking at just one crop in one corner of the globe.  

Let me get this straight  - Nobody is claiming that absolutely all the effects of global warming will be detrimental. On the balance, they will be, but a few areas of human enterprise will benefit according to the forecasts presented in the last synthesis report, at least on the short to medium term.

The Freud sketch was a comment on your apparent inability to discern the difference between agronomists and atmospheric physicists.

You'll have to be more specific about the East Anglia University simulation. Which one do you mean? You're not harping on about dendrochronology data again are you?

- or do you mean HADCRUT3 ? If you can't specify what you mean, how am I supposed to comment on it?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 15th, 2010 at 3:33pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #66 - Dec 16th, 2010 at 10:11am
 
.. Mozzaok - Will Talbot is a known spambot. Please delete.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 17th, 2010 at 8:41am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Beertruk
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 40
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #67 - Feb 3rd, 2011 at 8:06pm
 
Im trying to workout why the temperature was hotter in the Middle Ages than it is now...were people burning a lot of coal and oil back then? ...and then there was the Little Ice Age that Napoleon had a wee bit of trouble with in 1812 when he decided to gate crash Russia.
Back to top
 

Unlike Christianity, which preached a peace that it never achieved, Islam unashamedly came with a sword.&&- Stephen Runciman
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #68 - Feb 3rd, 2011 at 9:34pm
 
Beertruk wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 8:06pm:
Im trying to workout why the temperature was hotter in the Middle Ages than it is now...were people burning a lot of coal and oil back then? ...and then there was the Little Ice Age that Napoleon had a wee bit of trouble with in 1812 when he decided to gate crash Russia.



On what do you base that statetment?

...

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #69 - Feb 4th, 2011 at 7:38am
 
perceptions_now wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 9:34pm:
Beertruk wrote on Feb 3rd, 2011 at 8:06pm:
Im trying to workout why the temperature was hotter in the Middle Ages than it is now...were people burning a lot of coal and oil back then? ...and then there was the Little Ice Age that Napoleon had a wee bit of trouble with in 1812 when he decided to gate crash Russia.



On what do you base that statetment?

http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn11648/dn11648-2_726.jpg



Perhaps on the 1990 IPCC Report??

Oh well I can't get the picture to copy, so I'll link the page..
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/working-over-the-mwp-and-the-lia/
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #70 - Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:23am
 
Why would you go back to a report that is at least 20 years out of date? - besides, that graph applied to Western Europe.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #71 - Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:37am
 
muso wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:23am:
Why would you go back to a report that is at least 20 years out of date? - besides, that graph applied to Western Europe.



Well wasn't Western Europe where Napoleon was fighting in 1812??

And PN's graph is of the Northern Hemisphere...
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #72 - Feb 4th, 2011 at 10:18am
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:37am:
muso wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:23am:
Why would you go back to a report that is at least 20 years out of date? - besides, that graph applied to Western Europe.



Well wasn't Western Europe where Napoleon was fighting in 1812??

And PN's graph is of the Northern Hemisphere...


I love history too, but let's get back to the subject at hand - that of Global Temperatures. Regional studies, however fascinating they might be,  have no real relevance with respect to global temperatures.

Northern Hemisphere  temperatures are about 170 times more relevant that Western Europe. You might liike to do the maths.  Western Europe is 1,437,000 square kilometres. The surface area of the World is 510,072,000 square kilometers.

Northern Hemisphere temperatures, while not ideal,  represent a 50% sample. Western European temperatures represent a  0.3% sample. Not only that, but they are clearly different from broader studies.

Have I made my point?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 4th, 2011 at 10:28am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #73 - Feb 4th, 2011 at 12:38pm
 
muso wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 10:18am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:37am:
muso wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:23am:
Why would you go back to a report that is at least 20 years out of date? - besides, that graph applied to Western Europe.



Well wasn't Western Europe where Napoleon was fighting in 1812??

And PN's graph is of the Northern Hemisphere...


I love history too, but let's get back to the subject at hand - that of Global Temperatures. Regional studies, however fascinating they might be,  have no real relevance with respect to global temperatures.

Northern Hemisphere  temperatures are about 170 times more relevant that Western Europe. You might liike to do the maths.  Western Europe is 1,437,000 square kilometres. The surface area of the World is 510,072,000 square kilometers.

Northern Hemisphere temperatures, while not ideal,  represent a 50% sample. Western European temperatures represent a  0.3% sample. Not only that, but they are clearly different from broader studies.

Have I made my point?


No, because the 'subject at hand' was based on Beertruk's reference to the prolblem Napoleon had with the LIA in1812...
PN's graph was a response to THAT, and my graph/page was in reply to PN....
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: What happened to 2020?
Reply #74 - Feb 4th, 2011 at 1:55pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 12:38pm:
muso wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 10:18am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:37am:
muso wrote on Feb 4th, 2011 at 8:23am:
Why would you go back to a report that is at least 20 years out of date? - besides, that graph applied to Western Europe.



Well wasn't Western Europe where Napoleon was fighting in 1812??

And PN's graph is of the Northern Hemisphere...


I love history too, but let's get back to the subject at hand - that of Global Temperatures. Regional studies, however fascinating they might be,  have no real relevance with respect to global temperatures.

Northern Hemisphere  temperatures are about 170 times more relevant that Western Europe. You might liike to do the maths.  Western Europe is 1,437,000 square kilometres. The surface area of the World is 510,072,000 square kilometers.

Northern Hemisphere temperatures, while not ideal,  represent a 50% sample. Western European temperatures represent a  0.3% sample. Not only that, but they are clearly different from broader studies.

Have I made my point?


No, because the 'subject at hand' was based on Beertruk's reference to the prolblem Napoleon had with the LIA in1812...
PN's graph was a response to THAT
, and my graph/page was in reply to PN....


That is incorrect, my post was in respect of Beertruk's following comment, which I highlighted, "Im trying to workout why the temperature was hotter in the Middle Ages than it is now".
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print