http://www.infowars.com/did-nist-edit-wtc-7-footage-to-hide-evidence-of-implosion/

Did NIST Edit WTC 7 Footage To Hide Evidence Of Implosion?
                                    
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Thursday, September 2, 2010

After filing a lawsuit that prompted NIST to release more than 3 terabytes of photographs and videos from their investigation into the collapse of the twin towers and WTC 7 on 9/11, the International Center for 9/11 Studies has obtained evidence that suggests NIST edited several videos of the collapse of Building 7 in order to hide evidence of a controlled implosion.
Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)
The Center filed a FOIA Request with NIST on January 26, 2009, seeking production of “all of the photographs and videos collected, reviewed, cited or in any other way used by NIST during its investigation of the World Trade Center building collapses.” Following several unsuccessful attempts to get NIST to even acknowledge receipt of the Request, the Center was forced to file a lawsuit on May 28, 2009. Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, the Request was assigned a reference number, and NIST began periodically releasing batches of responsive records.
The Center has now begun posting some of those images and videos online, the first batch of which is from an external hard disk drive “NIST WTC Investigation Cumulus Video Clips.”
In one of the clips, the video of which has been in the public domain for years, a loud, low-frequency boom can be heard just before the east penthouse of WTC 7 falls. Once the support columns that held up the penthouse are taken out, the rest of the building falls almost within its own footprint.

I like a conspiracy theory as much as the next person, however, the "smoking gun" WTC7 theory is more about being a coincidental magic show.
The illusion to the viewer is that there was very little damage to WTC7 before it collapsed. This is far from being the case.

Unfortunately, it was difficult to capture clear images of the other (damaged) side of the building, but there are a few around which show that it was in fact extensively damaged.

I'M READY LEADER.

But on second thoughts........

a 757 cannot leave the imprint of a missile

re:pentagon.

the most heavily fortified building in the world it is said

or is it the vatican

both satanic as i observe this

namaste

all are forgiven

all are LOVED*

dear one,

i do not judge your judgement,you may,

if you have the care

comment on the topic or continue to distract from the title thread

it is for you to react how you will..does this comfort you?

about the 9/11 topic,

any comments?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Sep 5^th, 2010 at 11:30am:


Light is a strange person but the cover up after 9/11 is also very strange.

You're a dim-witted nut, that makes you susceptible to conspiracy and crank theories.

__________

this is a distorted view (perspective)

and has no bareing on true reality

only your individual experience

if it is your way or desire to attack and ridicule a being

bringing truth and facts,so be it

however

if this is happening,one may be required to look at the motive

smear campaign against that one whom does shine BRIGHT

with the LIGHT*

it is within for you dear one,you are LOVED

and FORGIVEN by me unconditionally

does this comfort you?