It's great to talk about Swine Flu in retrospect, but this virus had the potential to develop into a much more deadly strain, similar to the Spanish Influenza which killed millions of people worldwide. This one turned out to be a fizzer. It's all good. We can breathe a sigh of relief.

That's the things about viruses - they mutate. This one had the potential to be much more serious than it turned out to be by virtue of the fact that it crossed the line between species.  It's all a question of having adequate risk controls in place.  

Let's suppose that it had mutated and that no vaccine was available. What do you suppose the resultant conspiracy theory would have been then? That it was all a CIA plot to reduce world populations?

Should they be worried about that and try to address the risk by vaccinating as many people as possible, or should they just say - "Oh the latest internet conspiracy says that it's ok, and it's all about the phamaceutical companies making money" ?

Trust you to be sucked in by any conspiranut disinformation that's going around.

Let's suppose that it had mutated and that no vaccine was available.

__________

lets suppose the establishment has been lying to you

your whole life and and you are a taxable bloodbag,

little more

namaste

http://www.infowars.com/india-halts-vaccine-programme-after-the-deaths-of-four-children/


India halts vaccine programme after the deaths of four children
                                    
Christina England
vactruth.com
August 27, 20120
Vaccine programmes grind to a halt in India once more, when four children died after they received the measles vaccination in Lucknow. The four children were reported to have fainted soon after they were vaccinated and witnesses reported seeing the children’s eyes roll back as they began to have seizures. All of the children were under the age of two years of age, with the youngest being just six months. Sadly the children died before medical aid workers could reach them.
As news of the deaths spread, immunization drives in 41 villages have been halted until further investigations have taken place.
The Indian Express stated in their article “4 children die within minutes of vaccination” that-
“The immunisation programme was being conducted as part of the government’s Jachha Bachha Suraksha Abhiyan launched on August 15. Minutes after vaccination, the children started gasping for breath.”
NDTV reported that the Health Ministry has ordered an inquiry after the four infants, all now believed to be below nine months, died after the vaccine. The inquiry team has yet to reach Uttar Pradesh, however, the Uttar Pradesh government has announced compensation for the families of the victims.
This is not the first report of adverse reactions after the measles vaccination. The measles vaccine has had a dubious and rather tainted history. In the UK, a government report dating back to 1968 , exposed on the website VacTruth.com in May of this year stated:-
Section 6 – Reactions
“Mild febrile reactions and transient rashes may be expected to follow the administration of the vaccine in a substantial proportion of cases. The rise of body temperature which may occur from 5 to 10 days after vaccination – usually about the 8th day – is due to the multiplication of the attenuated virus. This febrile reaction, when it occurs, seldom lasts more than 24 to 48 hours. The Committee on Safety of Drugs has agreed that severe and unusual reactions to measles vaccine should be reported on the yellow card used for reporting adverse reactions to drugs. The Committee does not however, wish to receive reports of mild febrile reactions and rashes associated with the use of this vaccine.”
This proves that the UK government as far back 1968 knew that the measles vaccine gave children adverse reactions, in fact, after reading the papers it is very clear that they were quite happy to be offering babies a vaccine that they admit, in a substantial proportion of cases, gives them high fevers and rashes.
That same report stated in section 7 that it was unwise for this vaccine to be given to children under the age of 9 months.
“Section 7 – Routine Vaccination
The live measles vaccine should not be given to children below the age of nine months since it usually fails to immunise such children, owing to the presence of maternally transmitted antibodies.”
The Joint Committee of Vaccination and Immunization who advise the government said that the vaccine should instead be given to children in their second year of life after the completion of the immunisation against diphtheria, tetanus whooping cough and polio!
Yet it appears that none of this was ever even considered before the children of India were vaccinated.
In India ,this is the third vaccine disaster this year. In April the Indian Times wrote an article “Hib vaccine: Are press releases telling whole truth?” and reported that their country was being misled over the effectiveness of the Hib vaccine. The vaccine for Haemophilus influenzae type b (the main cause of childhood meningitis and pneumonia) was advertised as being safe and effective however, in the Medical Journal of Medical Research three senior paediatricians accused three agencies, USAID, John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health the Hib Initiative and the GAVI Alliance of misrepresentation of the facts by selectively and inaccurately reporting the actual findings of the Bangladesh Hib probe study in order to promote the vaccine’s wider use. The India Times said :-

“According to the Agencies joint press release the results of the Bangladesh study conducted in 2007 “showed that the routine immunization of infants with the Hib conjugate vaccine prevented over one-third of life-threatening pneumonia cases and approximately 90 per cent of Hib meningitis cases”.
It further said “this vaccine study builds on the evidence of the real burden of Hib pneumonia” in Indonesia.
Both these statements argue in favour of Hib vaccination in developing countries through “selective interpretation/presentation of the actual research findings”, says Jacob Puliyel at St. Stephens Hospital in New Dehli and one of the doctors finding fault with the press release.

aren't vaccines delivered with mercury?  Isn't that one of the most poisonous substances on the face of the earth? Oh, it's in our bodies now, that probably makes it ok, eh???

shampain socialist wrote on Aug 28^th, 2010 at 4:26pm:


No, only SOME vaccines use 'mercury'...and even THAT mercury isn't the 'heavy metal' mercury....

shampain socialist wrote on Aug 28^th, 2010 at 5:12pm:



Yes it does matter..
Methylmercury is the metallic version of mecrury...which accumulates (with toxic effects) in biological systems..

Then there's Ethylmercury...which is the non-metallic version of mercury.... which doesn't accumulate in biological systems

Vaccines use Ethylmercury, not Methylmercury...so there is NO toxic build up in humans (or any other biological organisms)...

like this:
http://nourishedmagazine.com.au/blog/articles/uranium-mercury-and-diabetes