longweekend58 wrote on Aug 1^st, 2010 at 8:53pm:


Yup, paranoid proprietor-cum-predator types are particularly creepy!

longweekend58 wrote on Aug 1^st, 2010 at 8:30pm:



Why does the anti-gun nuts only make reference to the USA and never to Switzerland or even Canada?

Both of those countries have a much higher gun ownership than the US but but we (Australia) are never compared to them only the US.

Personally I think we as a people are nothing like the US as far as gun ownership and usage but more like Canada, but then I don't need to make an extremist point to support my argument.



BTW I think Bob has done pretty well dealing with your and nemisis's churlish reductio arguments. Give me a party the leaves me the bugger alone and Im gonna listen to what they have to say.

lil.brat26 wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2010 at 5:48am:



Well it is 05:40 and I have provided sources before on yahoo, not that anyone bothered to read them.

But if you really want them and they would make a difference to your opinion, Im more than happy to expend a few hours to find them again.

If not, stay with your twee responses to my posts, it'll make you feel good about yourself and your opinions 

lil.brat26 wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2010 at 5:54am:



Wow, you found that a country with 300 milion people has more guns than a country with 34 million (canada) and a country with 7.7 million people (switzertalnd), not quite the point of my argument, but thanks for your effort. 

Please keep up the good work 

You are obviously the smartest person in the room, due to the fact that you knew that the US had more people than canada and switzerland put together, and you believe that I did not.

You have discounted rates of ownership and population distributions because you would have to concede your point of absolute numbers and focus on my question on why is Australian gun ownership only related to the US and not to other high rate gun owning nations.

Why is it that we were nothing like the US 200+ years prior to '97 but if we were to relax our gun laws even by the smallest degree we would immediately turn into the US?

But please do stick to that single misinterpreted point, because it does make you look very very intellegent.

So two questions posed, neither answered, so thanks for that.

But you did make an effort to present an infantile ad hominem reply / attack based on semantics, so once again, well done.  Maximum effect, minimum effort, the sign of a true intellect.

Maybe longy or nemisis may that the time to answer the questions, or maybe they will not, but I doubt they will present an infantile set of posts as yourself.

Yes I realise that you have to try and save face after your stupid post.
Perhaps a simple apology and acknowledgement that you stuffed up would have saved you, but no you chose to dig yourself further into the quagmire.
Guess you adopted the Homer Simpson (The Vigilante)when he was stuck in a hole and was asked how will we get out, "we'll dig our way out"!
And you're not satisfied with that so you go further with Chief Wiggums comment "dig up stupid"

Otto: Um, how are we going to get out of here?
Homer: We'll dig our way out!
Wiggum: No, dig _up_, stupid.



But keep trying Wiggy, it really is funny.....pathetic, but funny

So that is a no, then?


Imagine how much better this would have been if you  put in as much effort to answer the questions posed, as you did in hitting the emoticon button.

But hey, we all have our own special skills in life, yours is to focus on on semantics or mis-statements and pressing the emoticon button 20 or 30 times for each post you make, just to make sure your intent is known.