name-calling, ridicule, messenger-shooting. hypocrisy, lies,....  ad hom...  ah yes the list just keeps getting bigger doesn't it. 

Unfortunately the constant lies, flaming and crap from fd can illicit such responses.  Muso however doesn't have such excuses.

Don't make me reply to your libel again squibbly one.

I note all you seem to do is target people... me in particular for abuse, even when you know I'm not inclined to respond to you.

If you actually included all the crap i was reponding to you'd see it was actually factual.

there's no hypocrisy here goober...  I don't claim to be a forum saint.

Quote:



You forgot one - deliberate smoke-screening because he really doesn't have any valid counter argument.  It's a diversionary tactic.

I know that this is several years old now, but the facts are unlikey to have changed.

When science magazine examined ALL, the published papers written on climate change in the previous 10 years, that is papers by real scientists, crackpots and non peer reviewed works were not counted, there were 928 of them.

Out of those 75% agreed that man was having an impact on the changes, and the other 25% did not state an opinion about man's influence, but not one, zero, zip, nada, none, offered the opinion pushed by the denialists, that man has no impact on climate change.

I suppose they must all have been apart of that secret cabal of evil scientists that the denialists keep alluding to.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686

32,000! See the other thread.   You should sign up, Grendel. You'd easily qualify as an eminent scientist on that list.

Quote:

Yes Grendel, but in your case would the
"I"  stand for Idiot? Ignnoramus?  or Imbecile?

Certainly not Intelligence, not from the closed minded obsessiveness with which you champion the denialist arguments.


Also, your assertion that there are "many more" now, well considering they were starting from ZERO, I suppose even one would be an exponential increase, if that one happens to be a climate scientist who has published his study in a reputable journal for peer review, do you have any of those on the denialist team yet?

You can request to have it removed if you are offended Grendel.

That post was from Mozza the member.

If you want to complain to Mozza the mod, about it, I am sure he would agree with you, and remove the post if you were offended by it.

I am not unaware of what I am doing, but I had to decide whether or not to let being a mod, change my behaviour as a poster, and I decided I did not want that to happen, I like being a bit infammatory at times, but if anyone is offended by that, they can complain to me as a mod, and I would then objectively assess it from that position, or they could ask FD, or Locutious to intervene if they didn't trust me to be fair about it.

Mind you Grendel that I am not unaware of the very many insults we have traded over the years, so try not to appear too shocked by my little digs, we have traded far worse, and kept on smiling.

mozzaok wrote on Jun 6^th, 2009 at 10:47am:


If telling the truth offends someone, so be it.