Whatever happened to 'didn't win, must toodles'?

YAWN...

http://climatesanity.wordpress.com/

Wow...  I gather from past experience you actually think that is some form of refutation.  DWMT...

toodles

Grendel, We are waiting with bated breath for you to actually make a point. I guess your theory is that if you don't actually say anything, you can't be refuted.

Your floorshow is getting just a bit lame and you're boring people in droves. I think we've had enough of the Scoffing Shuffle and the Bellyaching Bellydance and the Guffaw'ing Galah dance.


Now here's the Digest aka How to say nothing and still think you are making a case:

You're still a (mod: deleted.  Personal attacks and gratuitous profanities will not be tolerated)....

No...  unfortunately its what YOU boil down to.

Cut and Paste - Etc, etc, etc....

Another cut and Paste without comment

Yet another cut and paste without comment

hypocrite

all you do is ad hom and ridicule...  it's what you people do.

dwmt.

Shooting messengers again guys...  typical...  need I mention Hansen and Gore both financial beneficiaries of the scare campaign, have been proven wrong countless times and they have been the main drivers of your belief in an unproven theory.

ROTFLMAO    

YAWN...

http://climatesanity.wordpress.com/

Wow...  I gather from past experience you actually think that is some form of refutation.  DWMT...

Flaming again fd... tsk, tsk, tsk...  hardly setting a good example, especially for a moderator.

Why don't you grow up?

 

Wasn't an insult....  was a fact.

Oh and muso as per your style...  only seeing one side of an argument...   

I know how much you dislike the "H" word Grendel, but you really need to take a step back and look at what you have posted on this subject.

You are working backwards from the point of view, that Global Warming must be a lie, and scour the media for any snippet which you feel will vindicate your belief, no matter how contradictory, or mutually exclusive, each successive cut and paste may be.

You then have a go at Muso for supposedly only seeing one side of the argument, when he has always shown an open willingness to explain his reasoning on every issue you raise, at which point, you absent yourself from the discussion, only to come back later with a newly trawled tidbit of misinformation dredged up from some denialist site, all the while not even attempting to actually debate your claims which muso took the trouble to refute, scientifically, and logically.

So who appears to be irrationally wedded to an unsupported belief?

It appears that you have a real blindspot in regards to this issue, and the only things you will even consider as valid, are the propaganda pieces from the denialists camp, which invariably get discredited, yet you fail to see the pattern.
You don't even wait for the flames to die down from the last lot of hoopla shot down in flames, before you trot out the next bit of misinformation, with nary a backward glance at the carnage of false and failed arguments, piling up in the denialist camp.

The trouble is, others do see a pattern, in the "science", you cite, as well as the abundant, but puerile, arguments presented by denialists, such as yourself, and their unwillingness to openly consider the facts as presented in an open, reasoned, and scientific manner.

So, before you cut and paste your next lot, ask yourself if you are willing to stick around and debate it on it's merits, rather than just using the scatter gun of misinformation approach, for that only creates confusion.
Alternately, you could just admit that confusion is all you really want.