100's of muslim apostates are being murdered in the 'West'.

Why won't the West, stop these murders of muslim apostates, in the West?


A GALLERY OF VICTIMS.....

".....And the thing is, this is the end - the final act, the culmination of the subjugation, oppression, violent abuse of women in Islam."
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/01/islam-killing-o.html



Many Western police forces are paralysed, by their own politically correct efforts to avoid being labelled as culturally insensitive, or 'racist'.

In the UK, the police don't want to get involved in the 'cultural matters' of others.....

Murder girl's five cries for help that were ignored
By FIONA BARTON and STEPHEN WRIGHT
11th June 2007
Five police officers are under investigation after a series of terrible blunders left a young Muslim woman at the mercy of killers in her own family.
....It also emerged that in the two months before her death she had warned police four times that she believed her family wanted to murder her.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-461280/Murder-girls-cries-help-ignored.h...


The Times
February 05, 2005
Muslim apostates cast out and at risk from faith and family
By Anthony Browne
While Christians who turn to Islam are feted, the 200,000 Muslims who turn away are faced with abuse, violence and even murder
For police, religious authorities and politicians, it is an issue so sensitive that they are accused by victims of refusing to respond to appeals for help.
Page 1
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article510589.ece?token=null&offset=0&p...





Many young muslim women are being murdered by family members, because they seek to escape the stifling control ISLAM has over their lives [exercised through their male family members].

And young muslim women in particular are being targeted, because of their vulnerability, and powerlessness.

These young women are being killed, because they are [easy] 'targets of opportunity', within the muslim community.

From the Hadith.....

".....I have been given superiority......; I have been helped by terror (in the hearts of enemies): spoils have been made lawful to me:"
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/004.smt.html#004.10...


"I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.0...

These are not 'honor' killings.

THIS IS THE KILLING OF APOSTATES, WITHIN THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY - IN THE WEST.

"Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has been established. Whoever leaves one of them becomes an unbeliever and his blood may legally be spilled. [The acts are:] Testifying that there is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of Ramadan."...."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/fiqhussunnah/fus3_50.html#3.110



WHY IS THIS 'CULTURAL' ABUSE, AND MURDER, BEING TOLERATED BY AUTHORITIES, AND GOVERNMENTS, IN THE WEST?

THESE LOVERS OF SHARIA, SHOULD BE STOPPED, FROM BRINGING THEIR EVIL CULTURE HERE.

TODAY, IT IS THEIR DAUGHTERS WHO ARE BEING ABUSED, AND MURDERED.

IF YOU IGNORE THIS TODAY,
....THEN 'TOMORROW', IT WILL BE YOUR DAUGHTERS WHO ARE BEING ABUSED AND MURDERED.



A Muslim rape epidemic [is] sweeping over Europe
-- and over many other nations host to immigrants from the Islamic world. The direct connection between the rapes and Islam is irrefutable, as Muslims are significantly overrepresented among convicted rapists and rape suspects. The Muslim perpetrators themselves boast that their crime is justified since their victims were, among other things, not properly veiled.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=473928E3-18E1-4E4E-ADF6-1AD7...


Uncovered Meat and Rape: Condemning an Honest, innocent Cleric
by MA Khan
02 Nov, 2006
http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/UncoveredMeat.htm

freediver wrote on Nov 26^th, 2008 at 11:40am:



FD,

That statement was quoted from the article i linked to, in my post....

i.e.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=473928E3-18E1-4E4E-ADF6-1AD7...



I have previously read that much of the mainstream media in Europe will NOT cover many of these incidents of muslim rape.

Because the topic is too sensitive to report, particularly because these incidents involve muslims.
....[perhaps some of the media in Europe are so intimidated by threats against Popes, and cartoonists, etc, that they now avoid many 'muslim' incidents / stories completely ???]





see also,

Google,
Muslim rape epidemic sweeping over Europe norway sweden
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Muslim+rape+epidemic+sweeping+over+Europ...

You are doubting this because?

Oh that's right if FD hasn't heard of it it's not reality..

Sorry fd, been a fact for years that rape has increased due the the Influx of muslims in Western societies.  I have heard of it in European countries for decades...  France even had a term for it... gang rape in particular  "take your turn"...  "tournante"  it was widely reported in Norway and Sweden also.  We even had it here.

A little bit of googling on your behalf would end your ignorance.

freediver wrote on Nov 26^th, 2008 at 11:55am:





Muslim Rape Statistics In Oslo, Raping Europe
March 5, 2007
While researching Danish riots, I wandered off topic for a second time. This time to Norway and an interesting article concerning the rate of rapes committed in Oslo. Muslims are responsible for a disproportionately high number of rapes. Just how many?
Six Times More Likely To Rape
It seems that rapists are six times more likely to be Muslims than native Norwegians in Oslo, Norway. This is according to an article on The Brussels Journal: The Essential European Blog.
http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/03/05/muslim-rape-statistics-in-oslo-raping...



Raped in Oslo
From the desk of Fjordman on Wed, 2006-12-13
There has been an explosive increase in the number of rape charges in the city of Oslo, but both the media and the authorities consistently refuse to tell us why. They did do so, however, in 2001, when two out of Norway's three largest newspapers, Aftenposten and Dagbladet, reported that most of these rape charges involve an immigrant perp, which again mostly means Muslims. Both newspapers have since then conveniently “forgotten” about this, and have never connected the issue to Muslim immigration although the number of rape charges has continued to rise to historic levels. They are thus at best guilty of extreme incompetence, since their former articles about this issue are still available online.
Norway’s Minister of Justice from 2001 to 2005, Odd Einar Dørum, mentioned the problem in 2001 but has later gone quiet about the issue.
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1754


FD,

There may be other sources available, but clearly some of these articles are not published in English.

And due to the sensitivity of these 'ethnic' incidents perhaps we should take the cue from our European brothers, and just shut up about this???

Self censorship is a wonderful thing isn't it?

And it seems that this, is what some of the European media is doing [self censorship], when 'confronting' incidents involving their muslim co-community members arise.

the facts there are quite concrete to me.

totally in synch with the sexist treatment against women elsewhere in the world in muslim countries.

freediver wrote on Nov 26^th, 2008 at 1:32pm:



I have to concede, that i doubt i can find clear set of statistics showing an influx of muslim men, and an increase in rape in Europe.

Perhaps where those type of statistics may have been collated, and released, in the past, they are deemed too controversial to release today?

A withholding of ugly truths, for the sake of inter-community harmony?

Do you doubt that the mainstream media, and governments in Europe are not reporting, and are actively suppressing such information from the public....'for the publics own good'.



+++++++


Men rape women.

Non-muslim men and muslim men.

But the Sudan Govt has claimed that devout muslim men are different.....


Darfur Women Describe Gang-Rape Horror
".....KALMA, Sudan - The seven women pooled money to rent a donkey and cart, then ventured out of the refugee camp to gather firewood, hoping to sell it for cash to feed their families. Instead, they say, in a wooded area just a few hours walk away, they were gang-raped, beaten and robbed.
......In May, after the top U.N. human rights official charged that Sudanese soldiers had raped at least 15 Darfur women during one recent incident, Justice Minister Mohammed Ali al-Mardi asked where the evidence was.
"We always seem to get sweeping generalizations, without naming the injured, without naming the offenders," he told reporters."
"...Sudan's government denies arming and unleashing the janjaweed, and bristles at the charges of rape, saying its conservative Islamic society would never tolerate it..."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/27/AR2007052700634_...





Further,
A very good, but disturbing article, exploring the issue of rape as a weapon, in conflicts......

May 14th, 2008 9:29 am
What Is Justice for A Rape Victim?
http://pajamasmedia.com/phyllischesler/2008/05/14/what-is-justice-for-a-rape-vic...

Quote:


I would be looking for statistics about the religious convictions of convicted rapists, at the time they committed the offense.

Quote:


You cannot unrelease information.

Quote:


I doubt they are reporting it, but I also doubt they are actively suppressing it.

Quote:


Not always.

I wonder if the Islamic policy of forcing people off their land and taking the women as sex slaves was an effective military tactic, in that it made people hesitant to want to take on the caliphate. Rape and pillage is one thing, but that takes it to a whole new level.

That first one looks interesting, as it appears that muslim organisations are conceding there is a problem.

The second one does not appear to provide any evidence. The last two are the same one as in the opening post of this thread.

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.116/pub_detail.asp

tallowood wrote on Nov 26^th, 2008 at 6:58pm:



tallowood,

Thank you for your contribution....


".....The Muslim population in Denmark, constituting a mere 4% of the total, refuses to integrate, consumes 40% of the welfare, and constitutes a majority of the country's convicted rapists. The Danes now acknowledge that their core values of personal liberty, free speech, equality for women and tolerance of other ethnic groups are incompatible with Islam as they know it."



But of course those 'muslim' rapists were....
.....muslim 'impersonators'.

Not real muslims.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 26^th, 2008 at 7:06pm:



And so Holger awakens.

The danes indeed are showing the way.

But it will be england again that will show that the wind has changed. Australia did it first, then Denmark (dontcha love 'em!). But the tide will turn when England follows suit. And then they will all do it, as always.

I find it odd that you 2 (g&FD) were unaware of the problems in Europe since the increase in Muslim migration over the last 3 decades there.

It was widely reported and even made the media here.

As for criminality...  why do we have dedicated Asian and ME crime squads...  hint; because there is a bloody problem.

freediver wrote on Nov 26^th, 2008 at 10:39pm:


The article was originally published in the New York Post as "Something Rotten in Denmark" on August 27, 2002. The Minister of Justice in Denmark reported that 76.5% of the rapes in Copenhagen were committed by non-native Danes, and over 3/4 of non-native Danes are Muslim.
Official police records do not record religion but you may look up and analyse data about how many rapes were committed by immigrants then do the same for native Danes, then compare. You also may look up number of immigrants and number of immigrants from Muslim countries.

http://www.statbank.dk is where Danish statistics come from, similar to ABS.

Sometimes so do I.
But good to have someone here to be the devils advocate.
To question claims, ask for proof etc etc etc.

freediver wrote on Nov 27^th, 2008 at 10:59am:









It doesn't really matter.

This struggle against ISLAM,
....we cannot win it.

Hmmmm....

Men, in a fight against SATAN, and his wiles.

I know who my money is on [winning]!



Look at the Western governments.

They feed on PR and polls, not TRUTH.

Look at how the Western governments of Europe are 'tackling' the problems posed by muslim communities.

Muslim communities complain, and the European governments capitulate.

Our leaders are deceived, by muslim apologists, because the muslim apologists understand that liars want to believe the sweet lies that muslim apologists will tell them.

It is all too easy.









'.....Just like in muslim countries.'


June 24, 2006
To allow Islamists to direct the post-7/7 debate was a disaster
Michael Gove
THE BRITISH State has come under severe criticism following the Forest Gate raid for its intelligence failures in the fight against terrorism. But the biggest failure of all in the battle against Islamist extremism has gone practically unnoticed.
...Proof of the British State’s institutional weakness came directly in the aftermath of the 7/7 bombings. At the Prime Minister’s behest the Home Office established a series of working groups to tackle the threat of Islamic extremism. A variety of individuals were appointed whose past statements or current affiliations made them very curious conscripts in the struggle against extremism.
Among those appointed was Ahmad Thomson, a convert to Islam who has argued in the past that....Muslims are obliged to want to live in an Islamic state.
...Given the presence of these and others with a similar perspective on the Home Office’s working groups, the conclusions were not that surprising. In so far as extremism was acknowledged as a danger it was attributed to the foreign policy of Blair and Bush. And in so far as remedial action was required, it seemed, again and again, to consist of more public money going to exclusively Islamic bodies that would be empowered to provide more Islamic solutions, in accordance with appropriate Islamic principles.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8802-2240635,00.html



The day is coming when British Muslims form a state within a state
February 19, 2006
....Dr Sookhdeo's family emigrated to England when he was 10. In his early twenties, when he was at university, he converted to Christianity.
....."The Government, and Tony Blair, the Prime Minister, are fundamentally deluded about the nature of Islam," he insists. "Tony Blair unintentionally revealed his ignorance when he said, in an effort to conciliate Muslims, that he had 'read through the Koran twice' and that he kept it by his bedside.
.....The Prime Minister's ignorance of Islam, Dr Sookhdeo contends, is of a piece with his unsuccessful attempts to conciliate it. And it does indeed seem as if the Government's policy towards radical Islam is based on the hope that if it makes concessions to its leaders, they will reciprocate and relations between fundamentalist Muslims and Tony Blair's Government will then turn into something resembling an ecumenical prayer meeting.
....."The whole approach towards Muslim militants was based on appeasement. 7/7 proved that that approach does not work - yet it is still being followed.
http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3645


++++++++


Jeremiah 17:5
Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.

Revelation 12:9
And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

Revelation 12:12
Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.

freediver wrote on Nov 27^th, 2008 at 10:59am:


I agree that result of statistical analyses of the data provided are somewhat ambiguous. It is possible though with very low probability that out of 100% of total immigrants 25% who came from non Muslim countries are engaged in raping while Muslim immigrants have low libido.

Nevertheless to attribute the faults in data collection to "fearmongers" is wrong. The real cause of ambiguity is due to police reports not having religion attribute, which is in turn due to misguided and overblown policy of politcorrectness. I think that people who want unambiguous truth about correlation of events with religion and/or ethnicity should demand proper data collection procedures instead of political filtering.

Since relevant data collection is politically suppressed  equating  the correlation with causation is natural trend. To refute it would be simple matter of authorisation by concerned ethnic leaders to collect relevant data and also have a "WHY?" questioner form to be filled by offenders.
Do you think that Muslim leaders would agree to that if they have nothing to hide?

freediver wrote on Nov 27^th, 2008 at 3:04pm:


Yes it would assuming that preached morality of "raw meat" has nothing to do with rape.

freediver wrote on Nov 27^th, 2008 at 3:38pm:


Since ethnic leaders took upon themselves to be ethic leaders.

freediver wrote on Nov 27^th, 2008 at 4:02pm:


Right. Why then did some democratic governments listen to these  charlatans?

freediver wrote on Nov 27^th, 2008 at 4:08pm:


That's why I called them charlatans. Don't you think that religion and politics should be kept separate? But is it the case with Islam?

So till politicians stop fear the truth the closest to reality confirmed by available data we have is the statement:
"The Minister of Justice in Denmark reported that 76.5% of the rapes in Copenhagen were committed by non-native Danes, and over 3/4 of non-native Danes are Muslim."

freediver wrote on Nov 27^th, 2008 at 9:42pm:


No. It is you who have to employ different methods if you don't like  those I have suggested. Till then the truth closest to reality confirmed by available data we have is the statement:
"The Minister of Justice in Denmark reported that 76.5% of the rapes in Copenhagen were committed by non-native Danes, and over 3/4 of non-native Danes are Muslim."

freediver wrote on Nov 27^th, 2008 at 10:03pm:


You mean you don't have a clue what is really going on I use available data to make a high probability conclusion, which is:

Quote:

freediver wrote on Nov 27^th, 2008 at 4:02pm:



FD,

Religious leaders within muslim communities, claim that they are 'properly guided', by Allah, to lead muslims.

So these leaders DO have, said mandate.



The Koran commands muslims to obey the clerics only.

Don't be disobedient to ISLAM, and the clerics....


"O ye who believe! Obey Allah and His Messenger, and turn not away from him when ye hear (him speak).
Nor be like those who say, "We hear," but listen not:
For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are the deaf and the dumb,- those who understand not."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/008.qmt.html#008.020


ALWAYS BELIEVE THE CLERICS, ALWAYS BE OBEDIENT TO 'ALLAH' [i.e. the clerics].

"O ye who believe! Obey Allah, and obey the messenger," [i.e. obey the clerics]
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/004.qmt.html#047.033


BELIEVE NO ONE,
.....UNLESS HE IS A MUSLIM.

"And believe no one unless he follows your religion.......True guidance is the Guidance of Allah:....He knoweth all things."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/003.qmt.html#003.73



Even secular press mirror this opinion...

'Turn the world to Islam'
March 11, 2007
The faithful are told to obey only Sharia law.
....One book, Man-Made Laws Vs. Shari'ah, urges Muslims not to "accept anything from their governments and rulers except sharia", stating any other system is heresy.
http://www.news.com.au/sundayheraldsun/story/0,21985,21359122-2862,00.html

freediver wrote on Nov 28^th, 2008 at 10:03am:


I repeat that it isn't me but you who can't get close to the reality.

As for myself I use available data to make a high probability conclusion, which is:


the truth closest to reality confirmed by available data we have is the statement:
"The Minister of Justice in Denmark reported that 76.5% of the rapes in Copenhagen were committed by non-native Danes, and over 3/4 of non-native Danes are Muslim."

That is GOOD ENOUGH because: "Remember, the politics is all about risk management, not proof.

It is irrational to demand proof in the face of risk. " (c) - freediver

freediver wrote on Nov 28^th, 2008 at 10:56am:


I have provided the reasonable standard of evidence more so then you did in environment topic. So if it isn't good enough for you here then your posts about environment risks are useless.

Which one it is?

freediver wrote on Nov 28^th, 2008 at 11:06am:


I am right, you are wrong.

freediver wrote on Nov 26^th, 2008 at 11:55am:


http://fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/08/rape-nothing-to-do-with-islam.html

Rape: Nothing to do with Islam?

I got some comments, among others from Norwegian blogger Bjørn Stærk, to my posts about the Norwegian government covering up the number of rapes committed by immigrants. The Swedish government is probably even worse, but Sweden is in many ways collapsing. Although he agreed that the statistics should be published, he questioned whether these rapes have anything to do with Islam. It is true that mass rapes of "the enemy's women", in part to humiliate the enemy's men, is not unique to Islam. It has been done at times of war by the Vikings, the Mongols, the Germans and the Russians during WW2, and all the way up to the Balkans in the 1990s. That's also my point. The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations are so extremely high that it is difficult to view them only as random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. This happens in most Western European countries, as well as in other infidels countries such as India. In Bradford, England, Channel 4 pulled a documentary about Pakistani and other Muslim men sexually abusing white English girls, some as young as 11. Writer Theodore Dalrymple thinks that "thanks to their cultural inheritance, (Muslim) abuse of women is systematic rather than unsystematic as it is with the whites and blacks." In France, grotesque reports about systematic gang rapes of French or "too Western" Muslim girls keep coming in. At the same time, European jails are getting filled up with Muslims imprisoned for robberies and all kinds of violent crimes, and Muslims bomb European civilians. You can see the mainstream media are struggling to make sense of all of this. That's because they can't, or don't want to, see the obvious: This is exactly how an invading army would behave. Rape, pillage and bomb.

I disagree that this has nothing to do with Islam. Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his slave girls/concubines. This is perfectly allowed, both in the sunna and in the Koran. If you postulate that many of the Muslims in Europe view themselves as a conquering army and that European women are simply war booty, it all makes perfect sense and is in full accordance with Islamic law. And Muslims do follow their medieval religious laws, even today:

Robert Spencer on rape and jihad

What does rape, then, have to do with these religious conflicts? Unfortunately, everything. The Islamic legal manual ‘Umdat al-Salik, which carries the endorsement of Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, stipulates: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” Why? So that they are free to become the concubines of their captors. The Qur’an permits Muslim men to have intercourse with their wives and their slave girls: “Forbidden to you are ... married women, except those whom you own as slaves” (Sura 4:23-24).

After one successful battle, Muhammad tells his men, “Go and take any slave girl.” He took one for himself also. After the notorious massacre of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe, he did it again. According to his earliest biographer, Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad “went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for [the men of Banu Qurayza] and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches.” After killing “600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900,” the Prophet of Islam took one of the widows he had just made, Rayhana bint Amr, as another concubine.

Emerging victorious in another battle, according to a generally accepted Islamic tradition, Muhammad’s men present him with an ethical question: “We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl [coitus interruptus] with them.” Muhammad told them: “It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.’” When Muhammad says “it is better that you should not do it,” he’s referring to coitus interruptus, not to raping their captives. He takes that for granted.

Here's what Vice Director of Jihad Watch, Hugh Fitzgerald, whom I rate in league with Ali Sina and Ibn Warraq as among the best commentators of Islam in this age, has to say about the issue (scroll down):

'For her to be absolved from guilt, a raped woman must have shown good conduct'

For non-Muslim women, they are in every respect -- the way they walk, the way they talk, those bedroom eyes we all know so well -- simply asking for it, and Muslim men have every right to do what they wish.

It is not understood that Western women are not so much regarded by most Muslims as individuals, but as "their women," the women who "belong" to hostile Infidels. They are booty, to be taken, just as the land of the Infidels someday will drop, it is believed, into Muslim hands -- by demographic conquest rather than military conquest. It has worked in many parts of Africa; and if Muslims fail to reproduce even faster than they do, there is always the expedient of killing the remaining Infidels.

Article continues at link.

abu said,

"......few honour killing threads have arisen here, because it's been conclusively proven it's got nothing to do with Islam."

"Christian beheads son at Jesus' request"
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1237096596/23#23


Rubbish.

These young muslim women [honour killing victims] are being brutalised and murdered because the are resisting the patriarchal control over their lives, which ISLAM sanctifies and demands.

These young muslim women are being murdered, because their families can justify the murder, on the basis that these young women have become apostates.

Which is demonstrated, by their rejection of the authority of ISLAM over their lives.





+++++++++







"Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has been established. Whoever leaves one of them BECOMES AN UNBELIEVER and HIS BLOOD MAY LEGALLY BE SPILLED. [The acts are:] Testifying that there is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of Ramadan."...."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/fiqhussunnah/fus3_50.html#3.110

Paraphrasing the meaning...
"Whoever.....becomes an unbeliever.....his blood may legally be spilled."








APOSTASY IN ISLAM
"Apostasy in Islam is commonly defined as the rejection of Islam in word or deed by a person who has been a Muslim.
The FOUR MAJOR SUNNI AND THE ONE MAJOR SHIA MADH'HAB (SCHOOLS OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE) AGREE that a sane adult male apostate must be executed......"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam









ISLAM's highest authority, Allah, in the Koran, instructs muslims not to allow their muslim daughters to engage with Kuffar society, in 'multicultural' tolerance [marriage to unbelievers].....

Koran...

".....Nor marry (your girls) to unbelievers until they believe: A man slave who believes is better than an unbeliever, even though he allures you. Unbelievers do (but) beckon you to the Fire. But Allah beckons by His Grace to the Garden (of bliss) and forgiveness, and makes His Signs clear to mankind: That they may celebrate His praise."

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.221




ISLAM is responsible for honour killings, ISLAM 'sanctifies' the murder's.