muso wrote on Jul 22
nd, 2008 at 9:52am:
There is. It's called imagination.
Imagination does not have the same effect as "E", if it did the "E" trade would die. Also "E" has a supressant effect on the ability to ejaculate, while giving the user a hightened tactile senory experience.
Nowhere close I'm afraid.
Quote:Ecstacy (MDMA) causes huge peaks in the seratonin levels and has implications for the melatonin cycle in the brain. It's just not natural to play chemistry with the brain like that.
What goes around comes around.
Taking any medicine can have similar effects. Prozac for example, or Clozapine, should we ban their use too? Alcohol has many effects within the brain and body, a fair case can be made for it having more dire physical and mental effects than "E", should we hand it over to the bootleggers to regulate quality and supply/profit?
Quote:You have the same level of "high" by watching a funny movie or having sex.
Utterly wrong. I take it you are not speaking from experience here.
Quote:The measured increase in the level of serotonin is the same or comparable. The serotonin production is natural and the depletion back to normal levels is gradual.
And would be more easily measured and allowed for in a legal safely produced product, or in the illegal ones available now?
Quote:Of course, it's not as "fun" as the "enhancements" but the impact of rapid depletion (comedown) and long term sustained depletion are more pronounced. The serotonin is below the normal level during comedowns. The lag and drag effect one feels (days) afterwards is where the body produces and bring the level back up to normal. Of course, MDMA use week in and week out will evetually slow and stop the serotonin production.
No gain without pain, I agree. But there again, this skirts the issue.
What harm is there in "E" use that makes it so illegal?
Here you go;
Quote:Scientists want new drug rankings
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6474053.stm
The drug classification system in the UK is not "fit for purpose" and should be scrapped, scientists have said. They have drawn up an alternative system which they argue more accurately reflects the harm that drugs do.
The new ranking system places alcohol and tobacco in the upper half of the league table, ahead of cannabis and several Class A drugs such as ecstasy.
The study, published in The Lancet, has been welcomed by a team reviewing drug research for the government. The Academy of Medical Sciences group plans to put its recommendations to ministers in the autumn.
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42718000/gif/_42718419_drugs_graph2_416.gi... Makes you think eh?