Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
Drugs are good for you (Read 9546 times)
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #15 - Jul 14th, 2008 at 4:05pm
 
I keep thinking of a film based in England where a middle aged English Widow starts growing a marijuana crop  in order to save the house. Her gardener was Scottish if I remember rightly. There was one hilarious scene where the local ladies decide to try this new 'tea' and end up in a giggling fit.

'Saving Grace' I think it was called. It was a good movie.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Acid Monkey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Goth Father

Posts: 1064
EU
Gender: male
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #16 - Jul 14th, 2008 at 4:17pm
 
Yes, not to be cofused with "Saving Grace" the TV series.





Margaret : [high on weed] May I help you?

Diana : [also high on weed] Would you like some Cornflakes? They're heavenly.

Quentin : No thank you I've already eaten.

Margaret : Would you like a chocolate ice cycle?

Quentin : I'm looking for Lilac House. I'm trying to contact Grace Trevethyn.

Diana : I love Grace. I really, really love her. She has wonderful hair... soft and silky like a lovely Angora rabbit.

Quentin : Right. Where do I find her?

Diana : In a lovely, lovely house. I love her.

Quentin : And how do I find the lovely, lovely house?

Diana : Up the uppity uppity hill.


** edit **

I forgot to paste the link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYGnmVAD2fQ&NR=1

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 14th, 2008 at 5:43pm by Acid Monkey »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53277
At my desk.
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #17 - Jul 14th, 2008 at 4:22pm
 
Is that the one where her greenhouse lights up the night sky?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Acid Monkey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Goth Father

Posts: 1064
EU
Gender: male
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #18 - Jul 14th, 2008 at 5:36pm
 
Yeah, that's the one.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53277
At my desk.
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #19 - Jul 14th, 2008 at 5:38pm
 
never seen it  Wink
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pommy Bastard
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 105
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #20 - Jul 21st, 2008 at 5:44pm
 
muso wrote on Jul 14th, 2008 at 1:38pm:
They probably didn't harm as many people as drink drivers do. They certainly don't cost society as much as smokers do. Their main harm was in supporting the drug trade.



They only "supported" the drug trade as there was no other way to obtain this little bit of fun enhancer though, surely?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pommy Bastard
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 105
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #21 - Jul 21st, 2008 at 5:46pm
 
muso wrote on Jul 14th, 2008 at 4:05pm:
I keep thinking of a film based in England where a middle aged English Widow starts growing a marijuana crop  in order to save the house. Her gardener was Scottish if I remember rightly. There was one hilarious scene where the local ladies decide to try this new 'tea' and end up in a giggling fit.

'Saving Grace' I think it was called. It was a good movie.


The spin off TV series, which I enjoy, is "Doc Martin", though it has little to do with the movie.

I used to live not far from where it was filmed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #22 - Jul 22nd, 2008 at 9:52am
 
Pommy Bastard wrote on Jul 21st, 2008 at 5:44pm:
muso wrote on Jul 14th, 2008 at 1:38pm:
They probably didn't harm as many people as drink drivers do. They certainly don't cost society as much as smokers do. Their main harm was in supporting the drug trade.



They only "supported" the drug trade as there was no other way to obtain this little bit of fun enhancer though, surely?


There is. It's called imagination. Ecstacy (MDMA) causes huge peaks in the  seratonin levels and has implications for the melatonin cycle in the brain.  It's just not natural to play chemistry with the brain like that.

What goes around comes around.

Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Acid Monkey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Goth Father

Posts: 1064
EU
Gender: male
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #23 - Jul 22nd, 2008 at 10:50am
 
muso wrote on Jul 22nd, 2008 at 9:52am:
Pommy Bastard wrote on Jul 21st, 2008 at 5:44pm:
muso wrote on Jul 14th, 2008 at 1:38pm:
They probably didn't harm as many people as drink drivers do. They certainly don't cost society as much as smokers do. Their main harm was in supporting the drug trade.



They only "supported" the drug trade as there was no other way to obtain this little bit of fun enhancer though, surely?


There is. It's called imagination. Ecstacy (MDMA) causes huge peaks in the  seratonin levels and has implications for the melatonin cycle in the brain.  It's just not natural to play chemistry with the brain like that.

What goes around comes around.



You have the same level of "high" by watching a funny movie or having sex. The measured increase in the level of serotonin is the same or comparable. The serotonin production is natural and the depletion back to normal levels is gradual.

Of course, it's not as "fun" as the "enhancements" but the impact of rapid depletion (comedown) and long term sustained depletion are more pronounced. The serotonin is below the normal level during comedowns. The lag and drag effect one feels (days) afterwards is where the body produces and bring the level back up to normal. Of course, MDMA use week in and week out will evetually slow and stop the serotonin production.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41911
Gender: male
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #24 - Jul 22nd, 2008 at 11:10am
 
i agree with you there acid

though drugs are not as harmful as the legal punishment, life is more fulfilling overall without them.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Pommy Bastard
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 105
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #25 - Jul 22nd, 2008 at 2:09pm
 
muso wrote on Jul 22nd, 2008 at 9:52am:
There is. It's called imagination.


Imagination does not have the same effect as "E", if it did the "E" trade would die. Also "E"  has a supressant effect on the ability to ejaculate, while giving the user a hightened tactile senory experience.

Nowhere close I'm afraid.

Quote:
Ecstacy (MDMA) causes huge peaks in the  seratonin levels and has implications for the melatonin cycle in the brain.  It's just not natural to play chemistry with the brain like that.

What goes around comes around.




Taking any medicine can have similar effects. Prozac for example, or Clozapine, should we ban their use too? Alcohol has many effects within the brain and body, a fair case can be made for it having more dire physical and mental effects than "E", should we hand it over to the bootleggers to regulate quality and supply/profit?


Quote:
You have the same level of "high" by watching a funny movie or having sex.


Utterly wrong. I take it you are not speaking from experience here.

Quote:
The measured increase in the level of serotonin is the same or comparable. The serotonin production is natural and the depletion back to normal levels is gradual.


And would be more easily measured and allowed for in a legal safely produced product, or in the illegal ones available now?

Quote:
Of course, it's not as "fun" as the "enhancements" but the impact of rapid depletion (comedown) and long term sustained depletion are more pronounced. The serotonin is below the normal level during comedowns. The lag and drag effect one feels (days) afterwards is where the body produces and bring the level back up to normal. Of course, MDMA use week in and week out will evetually slow and stop the serotonin production.


No gain without pain, I agree. But there again, this skirts the issue.

What harm is there in "E" use that makes it so illegal?

Here you go;

Quote:
Scientists want new drug rankings  

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6474053.stm

The drug classification system in the UK is not "fit for purpose" and should be scrapped, scientists have said. They have drawn up an alternative system which they argue more accurately reflects the harm that drugs do.

The new ranking system places alcohol and tobacco in the upper half of the league table, ahead of cannabis and several Class A drugs such as ecstasy.

The study, published in The Lancet, has been welcomed by a team reviewing drug research for the government. The Academy of Medical Sciences group plans to put its recommendations to ministers in the autumn.

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42718000/gif/_42718419_drugs_graph2_416.gi...



Makes you think eh?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53277
At my desk.
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #26 - Jul 22nd, 2008 at 2:13pm
 
...

Interesting graph. Is it based on total harm done to society, or potential ahrm to users?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Acid Monkey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Goth Father

Posts: 1064
EU
Gender: male
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #27 - Jul 22nd, 2008 at 2:52pm
 
Pommy Bastard wrote on Jul 22nd, 2008 at 2:09pm:
Taking any medicine can have similar effects. Prozac for example, or Clozapine, should we ban their use too? Alcohol has many effects within the brain and body, a fair case can be made for it having more dire physical and mental effects than "E", should we hand it over to the bootleggers to regulate quality and supply/profit?


However, those medication you have cited are controlled and pescribed by a medical practisioner. I'm guessing that is not what you are wanting for the distribution of E.

Pommy Bastard wrote on Jul 22nd, 2008 at 2:09pm:
Utterly wrong. I take it you are not speaking from experience here.


Which do you mean? Watching a funny movie, having sex or taking an E?  Wink Nevertheless, I'll put my hand up for all three and many more (I'm not totally innocent LOL).

Utterly wrong?
Fact: There are tests and studies done in the Netherlands that shows the measured level at the time of laughter when watching a funny movie is comparable to the serotonin level brought on by an E with 25mg MDMA; and at the point of orgasm the natural serotonin level is comparable to 100mg MDMA pill. There figures are from memory but I think they're fairly right.


Pommy Bastard wrote on Jul 22nd, 2008 at 2:09pm:
What harm is there in "E" use that makes it so illegal?



Um, maybe its the fact that it is a psychotropic drug and that they alter mood, mind and emotion.

I'll concede that Schedule A (UK) or Schedule I (US) is a little extreme and that it could be pegged back to either Schedule C or III. It's the same for marijuana. However, that still won't make it freely available to the party people.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Acid Monkey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Goth Father

Posts: 1064
EU
Gender: male
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #28 - Jul 22nd, 2008 at 2:55pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 22nd, 2008 at 2:13pm:
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42718000/gif/_42718419_drugs_graph2_416.gi...

Interesting graph. Is it based on total harm done to society, or potential ahrm to users?


What does the score reflect?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pommy Bastard
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 105
Re: Drugs are good for you
Reply #29 - Jul 22nd, 2008 at 4:08pm
 
Thanks for the replies.

Some thoughts.

Quote:
However, those medication you have cited are controlled and pescribed by a medical practisioner. I'm guessing that is not what you are wanting for the distribution of E.


Available under license from a reputable pharmacy should suffice.

Quote:
Fact: There are tests and studies done in the Netherlands that shows the measured level at the time of laughter when watching a funny movie is comparable to the serotonin level brought on by an E with 25mg MDMA; and at the point of orgasm the natural serotonin level is comparable to 100mg MDMA pill. There figures are from memory but I think they're fairly right


And that laughter/orgasm lasts seconds, whereas the "high" from an "E" (or more than one) lasts for 8 + hours, so they are not comaparable. Unless you claim the abillity to piss yourself laughing, or come, for 8+ hours? (If so, I'm very jelous!!)

Quote:
Um, maybe its the fact that it is a psychotropic drug and that they alter mood, mind and emotion.

I'll concede that Schedule A (UK) or Schedule I (US) is a little extreme and that it could be pegged back to either Schedule C or III. It's the same for marijuana. However, that still won't make it freely available to the party people.


I wouldn't disagree with that, although I'd prefer it to go further.

The graph " assesses drugs on the harm they do to the individual, to society and whether or not they induce dependence. "
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print