Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 
Send Topic Print
Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily) (Read 46755 times)
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #225 - Aug 28th, 2008 at 2:25pm
 
You are being selective in what lands you believe should be returned to prior owners on the basis of your religious beliefs Abu.

All everyone else is trying to point out is that once a land is lost, it is rarely given back.

Two choices, declare war, or get over it.

When you lose the war, then you can inflict decades of misery and bloodshed on everyone in your region by refusing to accept the fact that you lost.

Or you could get over it.

Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #226 - Aug 28th, 2008 at 2:29pm
 
Quote:
I think you're a little confused, and probably should re-read the posts you're responding to. It belonged to the Christians 1400 years ago (that was Centurean2's point) and then us big bad mean Muslims took it off them.


Yes Abu - I am confused.  You said:

Quote:
The vast majority of Muslim land was not originally Christian. They were Zoroastrian, Hindu, Buddhist etc. The bulk of Muslim population is concentrated in Indian sub-Continent and Indonesia, and neither of these areas were Christian, Please go take a history lesson.

Also, even the lands which were Christian, they'd been Christian for less than 500 years, they've been Muslim for 1400 years now, and prior to being Christian, what were they? Which people did the Christians wipe off the map to make them Christian nations? At least we let the Christians remain, you wiped any trace of pre-existing religions out of existence


There appears to be some contradiction and I am far from being a history or religion expert - can you explain it for the simple minded please?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #227 - Aug 28th, 2008 at 7:24pm
 
Quote:
You are being selective in what lands you believe should be returned to prior owners on the basis of your religious beliefs Abu.


Actually that'd be you. When it comes to giving a land to a people 2000 years removed from it, no problem, come on in, sit down, it's all yours.

Yet the people who are still half there, and only 60 years under occupation... sorry eggs can't be unscrambled.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
jordan484
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #228 - Aug 28th, 2008 at 7:27pm
 
SO, we're back to the "me first", NO ME first", I had it BEFORE you", no you didn't, I had a zillion years ago!"...etc, etc, etc, etc, ad nauseum.
Back to top
 

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #229 - Aug 28th, 2008 at 7:30pm
 
mantra,

Quote:
There appears to be some contradiction and I am far from being a history or religion expert - can you explain it for the simple minded please?


You said:

Quote:
So even if the land belonged to the Muslims 1400 years ago - who did it belong to before then.


Which I took to mean that you were under the impression it belonged to the Muslims 1400 years ago, yet not now. Most of the lands (that were formerly Christian) now inhabited by Muslims became Muslims lands around 1400 years ago, and have been Muslim lands ever since. So 1400 years ago they belonged to the Christians, who briefly ruled them for about 400-500 years.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
jordan484
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #230 - Aug 28th, 2008 at 7:31pm
 
Briefly.....400-500 years! That made me laugh.

I know, I know, in the whole scheme of things it's not that long, but it still made me laugh.
Back to top
 

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #231 - Aug 28th, 2008 at 7:32pm
 
Quote:
SO, we're back to the "me first", NO ME first", I had it BEFORE you"


It's quite ironic you say this regarding this situation, because if you knew the history of the land, you'd know that's the Jews only claim to  it. "Our ancestors used to live there over 2000 years ago, so you should kick out the 98% majority who are there and give it to us".
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #232 - Aug 28th, 2008 at 7:35pm
 
Quote:
Briefly.....400-500 years! That made me laugh.


Well considering it's less than 1/3 of the time Muslims have lived/ruled there, and less than 1/2 the time Jews were there... yes it was quite brief.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
jordan484
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #233 - Aug 28th, 2008 at 7:59pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Aug 28th, 2008 at 7:32pm:
Quote:
SO, we're back to the "me first", NO ME first", I had it BEFORE you"


It's quite ironic you say this regarding this situation, because if you knew the history of the land, you'd know that's the Jews only claim to  it. "Our ancestors used to live there over 2000 years ago, so you should kick out the 98% majority who are there and give it to us".

Why ironic? I've never stated I think the Jews were right or wrong. All I've ever said is this tit for tat, who was there first bull will go on and on and on forever, and it's stupid.
Back to top
 

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins
 
IP Logged
 
jordan484
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Genuine Aussie

Posts: 1115
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #234 - Aug 28th, 2008 at 8:00pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Aug 28th, 2008 at 7:35pm:
Quote:
Briefly.....400-500 years! That made me laugh.


Well considering it's less than 1/3 of the time Muslims have lived/ruled there, and less than 1/2 the time Jews were there... yes it was quite brief.

Yes, that's why I clearly stated "in the whole scheme of things"....but thanks for bringing that to my attention........
Back to top
 

"We should always say that I may refrain from publishing a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed, but it's because I fear you. Don't for one moment think it's because I respect you." Richard Dawkins
 
IP Logged
 
Classic Liberal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 769
sydney
Gender: male
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #235 - Sep 17th, 2008 at 12:23pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Aug 28th, 2008 at 7:24pm:
Quote:
You are being selective in what lands you believe should be returned to prior owners on the basis of your religious beliefs Abu.


Actually that'd be you. When it comes to giving a land to a people 2000 years removed from it, no problem, come on in, sit down, it's all yours.

Yet the people who are still half there, and only 60 years under occupation... sorry eggs can't be unscrambled.



palestinians never ruled or had sovereignty in Palestine. Turks did but the turks conceded the land to britian. The english then let it go to whoever wanted it. Both Jews and Palestinians wanted it, they had a fight, Jews won, story over, go home.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Classic Liberal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 769
sydney
Gender: male
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #236 - Sep 17th, 2008 at 12:25pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Aug 26th, 2008 at 10:40am:
Quote:
If we all had to give back what we originally stole - even going back 2,000 years


This is exactly what the world made the Palestinians do, give their homes to the Jews who's ancestors had apparently lived there 2000 years ago. Seems it's become quite a legitimate activity for the international community to engage in.


oh and the alot of the land jews took off palestinians they bought and paid for form the palestinain land owners. The rest was empty due to palestinian evacuation in the war, you should expect that when you declare war and then lose.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Islamic invasion of Camden halted (temporarily)
Reply #237 - Sep 26th, 2008 at 1:34am
 
Quote:
palestinians never ruled or had sovereignty in Palestine. Turks did but the turks conceded the land to britian.


The Ottoman Caliphate was not a "Turkish" state, it was an Islamic state. Turks didn't rule Palestine, Muslims did. As was the case for the last 1200 or so years. The attempt to make it appear as though Muslim Arabs were just one of many competing peoples who lived there under some foreign Turkish occupation is just nonsensical. It demonstrates that you clearly don't have an understanding of the history of the region, nor of the dynamics that made up the Ottoman state.

Quote:
oh and the alot of the land jews took off palestinians they bought and paid for form the palestinain land owners.


More nonsensical claims.

"When the Zionist movement started its ethnic cleansing operations in Palestine, in early December 1947, the country had a 'mixed' population of Palestinians and Jews. The indigenous Palestinians made up the two-third majority, down from nintey per cent  at the start of the Mandate. One third were Jewish newcomers, i.e., Zionist setllers and refugees from war torn Europe, most of whom had arrived in Palestine since the 1920s. As of the late nineteenth century, the indigenous Palestinians had been seeking the right of self-determination, at first within a pan-Arab identity, but then, soon after the First World War, through the Mandate system that promised to lead the new nation-states it had created in the Middle East to independance and towards a future based on principles of democracy. But Britain's Mandate charter for Palestine also incorporated, wholesale, the 1917 Balfour Declaration and, with it, Britain's promise to the Zionist movement to secure a 'homeland' for the Jews in Palestine.

Despite Britain's pro-Zionist policies and the presence of a growing Jewish minority, Palestine was still very much an Arab country by the end of the Mandate. Almost all of the cultivated land in Palestine was held by the indigenous population - only 5.8% was in Jewish ownership in 1947 - which makes the use of the adjective 'mixed' somewhat misleading, to say the least."
(Ilan Pappe, The ethnic cleansing of Palestine, 2006).

What this means is that when the UN partition plan was drawn up, under which the Zionists were to receive almost 50% of the land, they owned only 5.8% of it. This meant that Palestinians were going to have to forfeit about 45% of their lands to a foreign people who were arriving en masse. The lies about massive Palestinian land sales to Jews were concoted after the Israeli militias had ethnically cleansed most of the Palestinians from their villages. The rest were reckoned to have just "got up and walked off, after being promised victory from their Arab brothers".

Quote:
The rest was empty due to palestinian evacuation in the war


Actually, I've just had the pleasure of spending the last two nights speaking to many senior Palestinians who all remember quite vividly the Nakbah (The great disaster). They were forced out of their villages and their homes at gunpoint, by militias, many of them prior to the war. In fact the war was largely a response to the brutal actions of Zionist militias against the civilian population, or so the Arab regimes claimed, most were in it for a land grab themselves, but it was still a reaction to the massacres and expulsions of civilians all over Palestine.

Quote:
you should expect that when you declare war and then lose.


From December 1947 till March 1948, over 2,000 Palestinians were killed and 4,000 wounded by attacks of Zionist militia and terrorist groups on Palestinians villages. In March 1948, Plan Dalet was put into action, this is part of the description of that plan:

Mounting operations against enemy population centers located inside or near our defensive system in order to prevent them from being used as bases by an active armed force. These operations can be divided into the following categories:

** Destruction of villages (setting fire to, blowing up, and planting mines in the debris), especially those population centers which are difficult to control continuously.

** Mounting search and control operations according to the following guidelines: encirclement of the village and conducting a search inside it. In the event of resistance, the armed force must be destroyed and the population must be expelled outside the borders of the state


Benny Morris, an Israeli historian commented about the aims of Paln Dalet:

The essence of the plan was the clearing of hostile and potentially hostile forces out of the interior of the territory of the prospective Jewish State, establishing territorial continuity between the major concentrations of Jewish population and securing the future State's borders before, and in anticipation of, the invasion [by Arab states]. The Haganah regarded almost all the villages as actively or potentially hostile[1]
    [Plan Dalet] constituted a strategic-doctrinal and carte blanche for expulsions [from villages that resisted or might threaten the Yishuv] by front, brigade, district and battalion commanders (who in each case argued military necessity) and it gave commanders, post facto, formal, persuasive cover for their actions.


Benny Morris also stated that: "the 700,000 Palestinians who fled their homes in 1947 left mostly due to Israeli military attacks"
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 
Send Topic Print