freediver wrote on May 20
th, 2008 at 11:05am:
I am not saying we should put the economiy first. Nelson's idea is bad from both an economic and environmental perspective. That's why it is so broadly condemned as cheap populism. There is no independent social reason supporting his proposal. It doesn't make sense, whatever way you look at it. It is a largely economic issue. Putting society first does not mean destroying the economy for the sake of it. Your argument might make sense if you could point to some conflicting needs, but you can't. It's not like cheap fuel is some kind of fundamental human right.
You do say you prefer an economy before a society. You said this.
Quote:the Russians live in a society but not an economy. We have a decent economy and I will vote to keep it that way.
It's those damned Russkies who have a society but you choose an economy, you will vote to keep our economy over their society.
And no one said that cheap fuel was a fundamental right or even any kind of right. What I said was that while the government has monster surpluses they can afford to take less from the people. And in taking less they can lower the cost of one of the most expensive single items in a weekly budget - fuel for the Tarago. It's a two for one deal and there are no losers with this piece of brilliance.
Now Kevvy doesn't really want to lower the cost of the fuel as he promised - he just wants to watch it go up. And to make life just that little bit tougher he will even increase the purchase price of your Tarago.
That's Liebor and your economy at work.
I voted for a society. I voted Liberal.