Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
The Loony Left (Read 1878 times)
DILLIGAF
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1259
The greens are red
Gender: male
The Loony Left
Aug 13th, 2007 at 11:45pm
 
Funny that, how the police who are protecting these protestors are being verbally attacked by the protectees. Why the police just didnt walk away, i'll never understand.
These people make me sick, Nobody is going to listen to you if you preach violence and intolerance of the police and white people in general.

Watch this.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=hq8WX1Qg1PU


1780
Back to top
 

Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&&
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55130
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #1 - Jun 29th, 2025 at 3:47am
 
They're even more crazed, violent and bitter these days.
Especially now that they're losing it in so many ways.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55960
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #2 - Oct 22nd, 2025 at 2:56pm
 
Left-wing violence is a myth
Supposedly “violent” acts by the oppressed are, by definition, forms of self-defence


Woke World.  8 October, 2025.  By Titania "Teapot" McGrath



History is replete with violent figures on the right. One thinks immediately of aristocratic demagogue Oswald Mosley, Latinx soldier Augusto Pinochet and free speech activist Adolf Hitler.

But recently, the conservative media has been trying to claim that the left also has a problem with political violence. This is the most extreme form of gaslighting because the very concept of violence is inextricably tethered to systemic power structures. So, when someone on the left calls for those on the right to be attacked or celebrates when they are killed, it just proves that they are progressive and compassionate.

We on the left represent the oppressed, and all supposedly “violent” acts by the oppressed are, by definition, forms of self-defence. If a bigot indulges in hate speech — for instance, by suggesting that there are only two sexes or that women with testicles should be excluded from sororities, convents and harems — this amounts to a form of verbal genocide that must be resisted.

What some call ‘left-wing violence’ is properly understood as a praxis of redemptive kinetics

The accusation of “violence” in such cases serves as a discursive weapon to delegitimise the emancipatory actions through which subaltern bodies interrupt tyranny. In other words, to accuse a left-wing activist of “violence” is, in itself, a form of violence.

Let’s put this simply. To speak of “violence” in the context of liberatory struggle is to reinscribe the epistemic grammar of control, for “violence” when enacted by the subjugated is in fact the rupture of the normative order that itself is constituted by colonial expropriation, racial capitalism and the cisheteropatriarchal disciplining of bodies.

Marginalised communities, positioned within the necropolitical horizon of systemic disposability, cannot “do” violence; they can only enact counter-hegemonic gestures of refusal. To loot, to riot, to punch, to kill is not to transgress an ethical limit but to expose the fiction that the oppressor’s supremacy is incontestable.

What some call “left-wing violence”, therefore, is more properly understood as a praxis of redemptive kinetics: a loving counter-force that reorientates the subject away from domination and towards the nexus of justice.

And if you don’t agree, that just proves that you’re a Nazi who deserves to be punched.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55130
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #3 - Oct 22nd, 2025 at 3:14pm
 
Leftism is a political failure. More so than Communism.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6063
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #4 - Oct 22nd, 2025 at 6:42pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 22nd, 2025 at 2:56pm:
Left-wing violence is a myth
Supposedly “violent” acts by the oppressed are, by definition, forms of self-defence


Woke World.  8 October, 2025.  By Titania "Teapot" McGrath



History is replete with violent figures on the right. One thinks immediately of aristocratic demagogue Oswald Mosley, Latinx soldier Augusto Pinochet and free speech activist Adolf Hitler.

But recently, the conservative media has been trying to claim that the left also has a problem with political violence. This is the most extreme form of gaslighting because the very concept of violence is inextricably tethered to systemic power structures. So, when someone on the left calls for those on the right to be attacked or celebrates when they are killed, it just proves that they are progressive and compassionate.

We on the left represent the oppressed, and all supposedly “violent” acts by the oppressed are, by definition, forms of self-defence. If a bigot indulges in hate speech — for instance, by suggesting that there are only two sexes or that women with testicles should be excluded from sororities, convents and harems — this amounts to a form of verbal genocide that must be resisted.

What some call ‘left-wing violence’ is properly understood as a praxis of redemptive kinetics

The accusation of “violence” in such cases serves as a discursive weapon to delegitimise the emancipatory actions through which subaltern bodies interrupt tyranny. In other words, to accuse a left-wing activist of “violence” is, in itself, a form of violence.

Let’s put this simply. To speak of “violence” in the context of liberatory struggle is to reinscribe the epistemic grammar of control, for “violence” when enacted by the subjugated is in fact the rupture of the normative order that itself is constituted by colonial expropriation, racial capitalism and the cisheteropatriarchal disciplining of bodies.

Marginalised communities, positioned within the necropolitical horizon of systemic disposability, cannot “do” violence; they can only enact counter-hegemonic gestures of refusal. To loot, to riot, to punch, to kill is not to transgress an ethical limit but to expose the fiction that the oppressor’s supremacy is incontestable.

What some call “left-wing violence”, therefore, is more properly understood as a praxis of redemptive kinetics: a loving counter-force that reorientates the subject away from domination and towards the nexus of justice.

And if you don’t agree, that just proves that you’re a Nazi who deserves to be punched.


A bizzare word salad that attempts to justify leftist violence....these people are incredibly deluded and as more people get fed up with their antics they will resort to even grater violence...which they will attempt to justify. 
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55960
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #5 - Oct 22nd, 2025 at 6:46pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Oct 22nd, 2025 at 6:42pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 22nd, 2025 at 2:56pm:
Left-wing violence is a myth
Supposedly “violent” acts by the oppressed are, by definition, forms of self-defence


Woke World.  8 October, 2025.  By Titania "Teapot" McGrath



History is replete with violent figures on the right. One thinks immediately of aristocratic demagogue Oswald Mosley, Latinx soldier Augusto Pinochet and free speech activist Adolf Hitler.

But recently, the conservative media has been trying to claim that the left also has a problem with political violence. This is the most extreme form of gaslighting because the very concept of violence is inextricably tethered to systemic power structures. So, when someone on the left calls for those on the right to be attacked or celebrates when they are killed, it just proves that they are progressive and compassionate.

We on the left represent the oppressed, and all supposedly “violent” acts by the oppressed are, by definition, forms of self-defence. If a bigot indulges in hate speech — for instance, by suggesting that there are only two sexes or that women with testicles should be excluded from sororities, convents and harems — this amounts to a form of verbal genocide that must be resisted.

What some call ‘left-wing violence’ is properly understood as a praxis of redemptive kinetics

The accusation of “violence” in such cases serves as a discursive weapon to delegitimise the emancipatory actions through which subaltern bodies interrupt tyranny. In other words, to accuse a left-wing activist of “violence” is, in itself, a form of violence.

Let’s put this simply. To speak of “violence” in the context of liberatory struggle is to reinscribe the epistemic grammar of control, for “violence” when enacted by the subjugated is in fact the rupture of the normative order that itself is constituted by colonial expropriation, racial capitalism and the cisheteropatriarchal disciplining of bodies.

Marginalised communities, positioned within the necropolitical horizon of systemic disposability, cannot “do” violence; they can only enact counter-hegemonic gestures of refusal. To loot, to riot, to punch, to kill is not to transgress an ethical limit but to expose the fiction that the oppressor’s supremacy is incontestable.

What some call “left-wing violence”, therefore, is more properly understood as a praxis of redemptive kinetics: a loving counter-force that reorientates the subject away from domination and towards the nexus of justice.

And if you don’t agree, that just proves that you’re a Nazi who deserves to be punched.


A bizzare word salad that attempts to justify leftist violence....these people are incredibly deluded and as more people get fed up with their antics they will resort to even grater violence...which they will attempt to justify. 

It is satire but it captures the "minds' and sentiments of Sad Teapot, Armchair, duckwit, gweggy, karnal and  Bbwiyawn et al.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 23rd, 2025 at 7:47am by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 61096
Here
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #6 - Oct 22nd, 2025 at 8:25pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Oct 22nd, 2025 at 6:42pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 22nd, 2025 at 2:56pm:
Left-wing violence is a myth
Supposedly “violent” acts by the oppressed are, by definition, forms of self-defence


Woke World.  8 October, 2025.  By Titania "Teapot" McGrath



History is replete with violent figures on the right. One thinks immediately of aristocratic demagogue Oswald Mosley, Latinx soldier Augusto Pinochet and free speech activist Adolf Hitler.

But recently, the conservative media has been trying to claim that the left also has a problem with political violence. This is the most extreme form of gaslighting because the very concept of violence is inextricably tethered to systemic power structures. So, when someone on the left calls for those on the right to be attacked or celebrates when they are killed, it just proves that they are progressive and compassionate.

We on the left represent the oppressed, and all supposedly “violent” acts by the oppressed are, by definition, forms of self-defence. If a bigot indulges in hate speech — for instance, by suggesting that there are only two sexes or that women with testicles should be excluded from sororities, convents and harems — this amounts to a form of verbal genocide that must be resisted.

What some call ‘left-wing violence’ is properly understood as a praxis of redemptive kinetics

The accusation of “violence” in such cases serves as a discursive weapon to delegitimise the emancipatory actions through which subaltern bodies interrupt tyranny. In other words, to accuse a left-wing activist of “violence” is, in itself, a form of violence.

Let’s put this simply. To speak of “violence” in the context of liberatory struggle is to reinscribe the epistemic grammar of control, for “violence” when enacted by the subjugated is in fact the rupture of the normative order that itself is constituted by colonial expropriation, racial capitalism and the cisheteropatriarchal disciplining of bodies.

Marginalised communities, positioned within the necropolitical horizon of systemic disposability, cannot “do” violence; they can only enact counter-hegemonic gestures of refusal. To loot, to riot, to punch, to kill is not to transgress an ethical limit but to expose the fiction that the oppressor’s supremacy is incontestable.

What some call “left-wing violence”, therefore, is more properly understood as a praxis of redemptive kinetics: a loving counter-force that reorientates the subject away from domination and towards the nexus of justice.

And if you don’t agree, that just proves that you’re a Nazi who deserves to be punched.


A bizzare word salad that attempts to justify leftist violence....these people are incredibly deluded and as more people get fed up with their antics they will resort to even grater violence...which they will attempt to justify. 


And yet the vast majority of violence is still from the right.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 37220
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #7 - Oct 22nd, 2025 at 9:41pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Oct 22nd, 2025 at 8:25pm:
Belgarion wrote on Oct 22nd, 2025 at 6:42pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 22nd, 2025 at 2:56pm:
Left-wing violence is a myth
Supposedly “violent” acts by the oppressed are, by definition, forms of self-defence


Woke World.  8 October, 2025.  By Titania "Teapot" McGrath



History is replete with violent figures on the right. One thinks immediately of aristocratic demagogue Oswald Mosley, Latinx soldier Augusto Pinochet and free speech activist Adolf Hitler.

But recently, the conservative media has been trying to claim that the left also has a problem with political violence. This is the most extreme form of gaslighting because the very concept of violence is inextricably tethered to systemic power structures. So, when someone on the left calls for those on the right to be attacked or celebrates when they are killed, it just proves that they are progressive and compassionate.

We on the left represent the oppressed, and all supposedly “violent” acts by the oppressed are, by definition, forms of self-defence. If a bigot indulges in hate speech — for instance, by suggesting that there are only two sexes or that women with testicles should be excluded from sororities, convents and harems — this amounts to a form of verbal genocide that must be resisted.

What some call ‘left-wing violence’ is properly understood as a praxis of redemptive kinetics

The accusation of “violence” in such cases serves as a discursive weapon to delegitimise the emancipatory actions through which subaltern bodies interrupt tyranny. In other words, to accuse a left-wing activist of “violence” is, in itself, a form of violence.

Let’s put this simply. To speak of “violence” in the context of liberatory struggle is to reinscribe the epistemic grammar of control, for “violence” when enacted by the subjugated is in fact the rupture of the normative order that itself is constituted by colonial expropriation, racial capitalism and the cisheteropatriarchal disciplining of bodies.

Marginalised communities, positioned within the necropolitical horizon of systemic disposability, cannot “do” violence; they can only enact counter-hegemonic gestures of refusal. To loot, to riot, to punch, to kill is not to transgress an ethical limit but to expose the fiction that the oppressor’s supremacy is incontestable.

What some call “left-wing violence”, therefore, is more properly understood as a praxis of redemptive kinetics: a loving counter-force that reorientates the subject away from domination and towards the nexus of justice.

And if you don’t agree, that just proves that you’re a Nazi who deserves to be punched.


A bizzare word salad that attempts to justify leftist violence....these people are incredibly deluded and as more people get fed up with their antics they will resort to even grater violence...which they will attempt to justify. 


And yet the vast majority of violence is still from the right.



Probably.

Violence is part of anger and anger is a higher mode of functioning then

Apathy, nihilism, hopelessness , victimhood, learned helplessness, infantalisation.

The left are stuck deep in the hell realms, vibing with , say , the gazans.
Why?
Because that eternal victim , always crying and wailing like an infant strikes a chord.

A gazan who gets angry, violent and joins Hamas , is actually in a better state to ascend.
He is taking action, achieving a degree of agency, trying to be at the cause, not the effect.

This violence hopefully will bring him to his senses but it is a useful phase to kick start the climb to success.

He can eventually see the error of his ways.

One thing is for sure,

Staying in leftie hell and being a permanent parasite, a taker, an infant, a victim is getting you nowhere.

I almost see the freedom fighter/ terrorist as a superior being to THAT.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55130
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #8 - Oct 22nd, 2025 at 10:58pm
 
The majority of violence is not from the Right beyond self defence.
The majority of violence is coming from the Left, let alone those that the Left let into countries to run riot and terrorise.
The entire narrative of the Left is now an act of violence, like a liar/crook backed into a corner.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 89655
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #9 - Oct 23rd, 2025 at 1:34am
 
The tides have changed on all the woke madnesses.... every site apart from this one - a backwater (sorry, freed) which holds a few of the demented die-hards - the true neo-conservatives holding on to their ideas of 'city hall' and its right to impose - desperately digging that last ditch on every 'issue' they created and pushed for so long - is holding sway of more and more of those who disagree and reject entirely... yea - e'en unto 'feminism' - all the madness against which I have stood alone and railed against for so long.

It is so good - after forty years of endless and heartless battle and a great deal of personal loss in my retirement - to see my views coming to fruition...

Nobody paid me hundreds of thousands pa plus excellent super to oppose the madness...... but I did it out of principle... and now The People are raging forth to retake the high ground from the imbeciles and lunatics of the combined left and right of politics.

Melbadishu needs water cannon - I recommend pink dye to identity the malfeasants - would make that Cheeser burning the Australian flag while wearing Australian shorts and living on Australian dollars stand out, ay? Useless prick.

We dealt here, over endless years of deprivation and of loss and abuse, not with principalities of men or of women..... but with principalities of good and of evil.... of right and of wrong.... and finally Right has been upheld... and is shining a bright light forward to the future of the Civilised Tribes of the West...Let Right Prevail Though The Heavens Fall!

PHARKEM!
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 23rd, 2025 at 1:39am by Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55960
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #10 - Oct 23rd, 2025 at 7:49am
 
Jasin wrote on Oct 22nd, 2025 at 10:58pm:
The majority of violence is not from the Right beyond self defence.
The majority of violence is coming from the Left, let alone those that the Left let into countries to run riot and terrorise.
The entire narrative of the Left is now an act of violence, like a liar/crook backed into a corner.

Indeed.

The lefty violence and vandalism is re-labelled as 'mostly peaceful' in the grand tradition of the Lefty violation of language and thought.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55130
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #11 - Oct 23rd, 2025 at 9:14am
 
The Left is the narrative of the Media culture and hence why THE MEDIA supports the Left's actions and agendas with what they think is sublime bias, but to everyone outside of the Media sphere, is blatant obvious bias.
This Media 'support' just fuels more violence from a Left that believes, like a religion, that it is morally superior.
(Yeah, Gollum thought of himself as much too)
But their violence and support of violence like terrorists, illegals and masked Protesters - betray their own self proclamations of morally peaceful, benevolent, etc.

Never has there been such a great political lie and falsehood as this. Not even Communism has attained such pure insane denial.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55960
Gender: male
Re: The Loony Left
Reply #12 - Jan 13th, 2026 at 9:52am
 
Berlin’s horrendous four-day blackout, which plunged over 45,000 households in the city’s south-west into darkness, is finally over. Beginning last Saturday and lasting for four nights, the blackouts left homes, shops and care facilities without light, heating and communications access – just as a particularly nasty cold spell sent temperatures plummeting to minus-10 degrees Celsius. The far-left ‘Volcano Group’ (Vulkangruppe) has claimed responsibility for the blackout, which it reportedly achieved by setting fire to electricity cables connected to Berlin’s largest gas power plant.


....
Beyond ideology, the blackout exposed something darker: the deep incompetence of a state that barely functions in a crisis. As Bild noted bitterly, war-torn Ukraine is able to repair damaged electricity grids within 24 hours. Yet it took nearly a week for Berlin to get its act together.

Until that point, it was sheer chaos. Residents were told to move to hotels and streets went pitch black when the sun fell. Only a few vintage gas lamps illuminated the streets. Some households managed to keep warm with diesel generators, but most were left helpless. After electricity returned, at least one woman – an 83-year-old – was found dead in her flat.


A retired firefighter summed it up perfectly in the Berliner Zeitung: for years, officials at every level of government have been more concerned with non-issues such as gender-neutral language and the width of cycle paths, than the legitimate needs of the public. Add to that the enormous resources spent policing ‘hate speech’, and the result is a state distracted from, and unable to perform, its core duties.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print