ALP or NLP...
...the 'position' of the Prime Minister will always SERVE the United States of America.
Just like the Governor-General serves the United Kingdom.

And let's face it. These days, the UK serves the USA anyway. 



So what then, is it of Australian 'Politics'...
...that serves Australia?

Is it 'the People'?
What 'people'?
Where are these ...People?
A paltry population of Monarchists and Pro-Americans
who want a 'President' as a Head of State.

Yes - tell me.
Where are these 'People' who will take ...the Power in the name of a Re-PUBLIC?



Go on Australia.
Step out of that door from under the roof of the UK
and discover that the door of the USA will close upon you as well.
Where will you be then?
What 'Politics' will you have to show for yourselves?

Do you honestly think that making a Republic is just a matter of changing words on pieces of ...paper?

The CONSEQUENCES of a Republic is something you should all consider carefully. Very carefully.

So before you become Anti-Monarchist and seek a Republic, because you are Pro-American for a President as a Head of State.
Like a rebellious teenage who storms out of home from his Parent's rules, only to seek refuge at his Uncle's - as if that is the answer.

Consider this.
Maybe, just maybe - the future of Australia IS NOT...
...Politics.

If you become a Republic.
YOU WILL ALL LOSE EVERYTHING!

...but you will all at least gain your 'Freedom' finally.

Political 'poverty' and Freedom?
Or a nice cushy nation with benefits ...but in chains still?

You renounce the Monarchy (UK) and the American representative ...the Unions, will take the money ...like Thieves.

The UK may have treated you 'Convicts' harshly in 'the Past'.
But that was then.
This is now.
And that 'chain' that shackles you to the UK, may 'now' be the only saving grace you have.

...when the (Yankee) Unionism comes to 'take the money' for their 'President as a Head of - the States'.


Best of luck...
...in the Lucky Country.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28^th, 2015 at 10:02am:



The PM has authority in the party which elected him/her - the PM does NOT possess, and never can possess, dictatorial or arbitrary and unconstrained power over the people.

Personally I fail to see why a lackey of a party should be paid handsomely to be the head of that party in the parliament - same as I fail to see why we need handsomely paid 'ministers' when there is an established public service that does the job for them... if they will listen...

In this nation, however, there is little conceptualisation of the reality of government or official status - and we continue to labour under the delusion that 'city hall' has rights, when all it has is power given by US.

When that power is abused to exercise control rather than service to the people - it is despotism.

"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak, and that it is doing God's service when it is violating all His laws."

- John Adams.

Jasin wrote on Aug 4^th, 2017 at 4:56pm:



Australia: "Yeah, Nah".