Grey wrote on Aug 6
th, 2011 at 7:30pm:
A 'bill of rights' that's within the parameters of Law is not so bad; this is the case in Britain. But one that is set and marbalised into a constitution is no good.
the arguement For a BOR is to prevent what you are advocating - that in the end you will go cap in hand top the ruling goverment of the day asking for "more please".
On the other hand, human rights; enshrined in a legally binding constitutional document that dictates the framework for ALL other laws to live upto ensures governmnents may come and go - but our rights could never be taken away from us unless we ALL agreed to it through a legally held ballot.
The established acquiescence this government continues to operate under - gained through the duopoly of established environmental circumstances ie the colonies initially operated under royal decree and, the duplicitous lies that are peddled by those who pronounce there is nothing wrong with the system. Both delusions are strategically maintained by the cultural elite and is duly leveraged by the lack of certainty in most Aussies of what their national and human birth-right really is.
If all Australians truly understood that the concept of "a fair go" can be explicitly defined by a set of rules that ensure goverments can not legislate away those birth-rights, then I believe there would be a profound shift toward a declaration of independence and the institution of a republic protected by a people who have been granted unassialable rights with the guaranteed protection of those rights from all enemies - within or out - who try to interfere with those rights and freedoms.
And inside of all I have said is not one reference to a gun or army or violence.... so please don't anyone come the raw prawn china.
And that is essentially the ONLY thing a Bill of Rights achieves. Which is the inverse and diametrical opposite of what is promised by our current system. While many use the throw away line - nothing wrong so blah blah blah.......... - I see that presently I am expected to defend this land and it's rulers for a guarantee of nothing other than a chance to mosey through life and if any of my assumed rights are impinged upon by local, state or federal governments then there is SFA that I can do to change the laws of the land except through pursuing the matter throught the courts.
What do I mean by that? Simply this - as there is no explicit rights outlined in our constitution except for those entitlements granted non-human legal entities called by most of us humans "corporations", to launch a civil court case and have a determination preventing laws that breach your implicitly alluded to rights in our "constitution", you would first need to have a court explicitly first hand down a finding that you indeed have those rights you want to refer to in your case against a malicious local state or federal goverment.
At present your only right in this this society is to eat crap at the behest of others. And don't you complain to loudly about it either because if you do - you could be dragged of to a tiny little room and detained without legal representation for some days. And if you felt the need to tell someone your detention without the federal government approval - you could find your self detained for up to 25 years for contempt of court...... oh and by the way if you ever find yourself in this position because of some sort of error (like the ones that happen when you pinged for a speeding ticket or redlight camera - and you know you weren't guity) then make sure you let all the family members that know you're being detained they should tell your lawyer/boss/newspaper editor/politcal party/union, because they will end up in jail as well.
No I'm not talking about Sudan or Somalia or even Pakistan, I'm refering to our own native government. Still feel like sumpin aint broke???
A fair go can never be truly offered or indeed sought under a system that is framed by racism and and antiquated class system.
Don't be afraid of the freedom- embrace your destiny without the shackles of a superstitious system that depends on us in believing that some how a few dozen families - THROUGH BIRTHRIGHT - are inexplicably better than all other humans in the world.
What sort of childish simpleton swollows this retched camel dung proposition?
I'll tell you who - those who have extracted privilige from this form of coercive, barbarous, blood-thirsty, divisive methodology born through the purist form racist ideology this side of the birth of JC. The irony is most if not all of the zealots who advocate this sort of tryanny are supposed "believers" of various different faiths that only inspire a sense of unease in each other.
To simply defer to another set of country's codes framed over the last two millenia by a ruling class riddled with indelibly engraved ruling class notions is to ask for trouble.
Others imply if there's nothing wrong then don't fix it... to blithely suggest through inference there is nothing wrong with our present system is to ignore the surroundings in which we live.....
EOR