Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Should Australia become a republic?



« Created by: DILLIGAF on: Mar 6th, 2007 at 10:11pm »

Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 ... 38
Send Topic Print
Should Australia become a republic? (Read 51998 times)
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #390 - Aug 6th, 2011 at 8:35pm
 
I still get a laugh out of the interview when John Howard decided he'd try and prove he was the 'man of steel' by telling us and the world that (in the event of an Obama election win)

"If I were running al Qaeda in Iraq, I would put a circle around March 2008, and pray, as many times as possible, for a victory not only for Obama, but also for the Democrats"

To which Obama replied

"We have close to 140,000 troops on the ground now and my understanding is that Mr. Howard has deployed 1,400. So, if he's ginned up to fight the good fight in Iraq, I would suggest he call up another 20,000 Australians and send them up to Iraq."

No more was heard from the man of..stee errr.. putty... He fell back into line, like the good representative of the vassal state we are.

Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #391 - Aug 6th, 2011 at 9:04pm
 
australia is a colony

bounded within the magne carte

it is said

namaste
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Frances
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3577
In a Castle in the Hills
Gender: female
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #392 - Aug 7th, 2011 at 3:02am
 
it_is_the_light wrote on Aug 6th, 2011 at 9:04pm:
australia is a colony

bounded within the magne carte

it is said

namaste


What on  earth are you raving on about?
Back to top
 

Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece.
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #393 - Aug 7th, 2011 at 6:29am
 
Frances wrote on Aug 7th, 2011 at 3:02am:
it_is_the_light wrote on Aug 6th, 2011 at 9:04pm:
australia is a colony

bounded within the magne carte

it is said

namaste


What on  earth are you raving on about?


Grin When you find out you can let me know... on second thoughts...
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
Dooley
Senior Member
****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 345
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #394 - Aug 21st, 2011 at 10:45pm
 
Grey wrote on Aug 6th, 2011 at 7:30pm:
A 'bill of rights' that's within the parameters of Law is not so bad; this is the case in Britain. But one that is set and marbalised into a constitution is no good.


the arguement For a BOR is to prevent what you are advocating - that in the end you will go cap in hand top the ruling goverment of the day asking for "more please".

On the other hand, human rights; enshrined in a legally binding constitutional document that dictates the framework for ALL other laws to live upto ensures governmnents may come and go - but our rights could never be taken away from us unless we ALL agreed to it through a legally held ballot.

The established acquiescence this government continues to operate under - gained through the duopoly of established environmental circumstances ie the colonies initially operated under royal decree and, the duplicitous lies that are peddled by those who pronounce there is nothing wrong with the system. Both delusions are strategically maintained by the cultural elite and is duly leveraged by the lack of certainty in most Aussies of what their national and human birth-right really is.

If all Australians truly understood that the concept of "a fair go" can be explicitly defined by a set of rules that ensure goverments can not legislate away those birth-rights, then I believe there would be a profound shift toward a declaration of independence and the institution of a republic protected by a people who have been granted unassialable rights with the guaranteed protection of those rights from all enemies - within or out - who try to interfere with those rights and freedoms.

And inside of all I have said is not one reference to a gun or army or violence.... so please don't anyone come the raw prawn china.

And that is essentially the ONLY thing a Bill of Rights achieves. Which is the inverse and diametrical opposite of what is promised by our current system. While many use the throw away line - nothing wrong so blah blah blah.......... -  I see that presently I am expected to defend this land and it's rulers for a guarantee of nothing other than a chance to mosey through life and if any of my assumed rights are impinged upon by local, state or federal governments then there is SFA that I can do to change the laws of the land except through pursuing the matter throught the courts.

What do I mean by that? Simply this - as there is no explicit rights outlined in our constitution except for those entitlements granted non-human legal entities called by most of us humans "corporations", to launch a civil court case and have a determination preventing laws that breach your implicitly alluded to rights in our "constitution", you would first need to have a court explicitly first hand down a finding that you indeed have those rights you want to refer to in your case against a malicious local state or federal goverment.

At present your only right in this this society is to eat crap at the behest of others. And don't you complain to loudly about it either because if you do - you could be dragged of to a tiny little room and detained without legal representation for some days. And if you felt the need to tell someone your detention without the federal government approval - you could find your self detained for up to 25 years for contempt of court...... oh and by the way if you ever find yourself in this position because of some sort of error (like the ones that happen when you pinged for a speeding ticket or redlight camera - and you know you weren't guity) then make sure you let all the family members that know you're being detained they should tell your lawyer/boss/newspaper editor/politcal party/union, because they will end up in jail as well.

No I'm not talking about Sudan or Somalia or even Pakistan, I'm refering to our own native government. Still feel like sumpin aint broke???

A fair go can never be truly offered or indeed sought under a system that is framed by racism and and antiquated class system.

Don't be afraid of the freedom- embrace your destiny without the shackles of a superstitious system that depends on us in believing that some how a few dozen families  - THROUGH BIRTHRIGHT - are inexplicably better than all other humans in the world.

What sort of childish simpleton swollows this retched camel dung proposition?
I'll tell you who - those who have extracted privilige from this form of coercive, barbarous, blood-thirsty, divisive methodology born through the purist form racist ideology this side of the birth of JC. The irony is most if not all of the zealots who advocate this sort of tryanny are supposed "believers" of various different faiths that only inspire a sense of unease in each other.

To simply defer to another set of country's codes framed over the last two millenia by a ruling class riddled with indelibly engraved ruling class notions is to ask for trouble.

Others imply if there's nothing wrong then don't fix it... to blithely suggest through inference there is nothing wrong with our present system is to ignore the surroundings in which we live.....


EOR Cool
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PigStyPete
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 126
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #395 - Feb 19th, 2012 at 4:19pm
 
The main reason for the Monarchy are the "LAWS UNDER THE CROWN" . The laws under the Crown should stop Gillard types from throwing thei p*ssiey sh*t around too much .The seperation of Powers (hopefully) etc .  If there was a Constituion the copy of America I would vote for it .
Back to top
 

AH IZZ A BANJO PLAYIN, PIG FRICKIN HILLBILLY ,well , maybe not so much of the banjo playin . COMMIES ARE NAZI WARPIG VULTURES----------- ------------have a nice day comrades------
 
IP Logged
 
red baron
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #396 - Feb 20th, 2012 at 12:45pm
 
enviro....do you have sex with one of those blow up dolls you bought off the net?

Also Labour is spelled Labor.

And Partys are spelled Parties.

Did you just crawl out of the swamp?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dooley
Senior Member
****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 345
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #397 - Feb 21st, 2012 at 9:08pm
 
republic is formed to support present non-existent Bill of Rights will result in formalised State of Capitalism as present Constititution is chiefly a document that outlines the states and fed method of delivering fair and just business model as the underpinning values that allow maximum "freedom" for the state consumer slave.

Neeeeeed BILL OF RIGHTS enshrined in constitution before Republic. Only then will the idea of a republic mean something for humans. Humans first - then allow by law (which can be changed at the whim of government) privileges for business to operate. Presently corporations and companies have more explict rights in the Constitution than humans.

Really couldn't give a fig if we have a republic or not though. As long as we had a BOR then even a benevolent dictator that upheld the BOR embedded in the Constitution would be better than what we have at the moment.......
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
It_is_the_Darkness
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4000
in a ReTardis
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #398 - Feb 21st, 2012 at 9:29pm
 
Australia WILL become a Republic.
Especially not long after the current Queen passes on.
The States will be disengaged to provide for Provincials.
The offices of Govenor-General and Prime Minister will be disolved to be replaced by a Chairperson who presides over all the Provincials who now have greater power than the current Federal level.

Things will be vastly different.
For one thing - the slate will be cleaned afresh and 'everyone' will be treated 'equally'!
No special preferences for British or Aboriginals.

50% is Australia wants to become a Republic.
50% is the World wants Australia to beome a Republic.

...and it ain't like the Republics you have everywhere else. Wink
Back to top
 

SUCKING ON MY TITTIES, LIKE I KNOW YOU WANT TO.
 
IP Logged
 
Mnemonic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1530
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #399 - Feb 21st, 2012 at 10:46pm
 
I don't think we should become a republic. They say if the system isn't broken, don't fix it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
It_is_the_Darkness
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4000
in a ReTardis
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #400 - Feb 22nd, 2012 at 6:48am
 
Australia didn't CHANGE for 40,000 years and look what happened to their 'perfect' world. Roll Eyes

We must always keep changing ...with the world that keeps turning.

"If it ain't broke don't fix it?" Huh
Its a common saying now to the Republic issue.
"Hey mate, I'm broke - do you have some change for me."
...its all about compassion for your battling mates and I'm not talking about the drunk ones, etc.
Back to top
 

SUCKING ON MY TITTIES, LIKE I KNOW YOU WANT TO.
 
IP Logged
 
Liberty
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3
Gender: female
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #401 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 1:29pm
 
Well Australia did not blow its chance as the last referendum for a republic, was set up to actually stop this.
Australia as most other governments and countries are , are no more then a corporation filed with a business identity in the UN.
So when you see COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA on any thing you know this is the the scam of the lying politicians who in fact have committed treason against their country.
So Australia is run by a Federal corporation along with every state.
That is why you see the courts being run under admiralty law,with statues as its base, instead of common law.
Australia is just another arm of the globalists cartel with the Queen of England being one head of them.
So be careful what you go into contract with.
In fact everything that is being done is totally illegal and corrupt.
So the only way to reclaim your liberty and freedom is to declare your sovereignty. Australia has never been a sovereign nation.
Most people are totally unaware of the truth, that is why they need to begin action in these areas to reclaim their god given rights, which they have never fully had here. Nor most countries have never had - it is a mere illusion. No real democracy and no real choice.
Wake up do your research and begin to reclaim your birth rights starting on your local level.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
red baron
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #402 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 3:02pm
 
Give it a bit more time and a few thousand more boats and we'll be able to decide whether we want to become the Isamlic Republic of Australia.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
falah
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3162
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #403 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 3:11pm
 
...


...


Quote:
Asylum-seekers arrive by plane, not boat


    More asylum-seekers arrive by plane
    4768 plane arrivals applied for visas in 2008
    28 per cent of 'plane people' are Sri Lankan


EVERY day, at least 13 asylum-seekers enter Australia through airports, representing 30 times the number of boat people that are supposedly "flooding" across our maritime borders.

A total of 4768 "plane people" - more than 96 per cent of applicants for refugee status - arrived by aircraft in 2008 on legitimate tourist, business and other visas compared with 161 who arrived by boat during the same period, the Sunday Telegraph reports.

And plane people are much less likely than boat people to be genuine refugees, with only about 40-60 per cent granted protection visas, compared with 85-90 per cent of boat people who are found to be genuine refugees...

But whereas boat people are detained on Christmas Island while their claims are processed, plane people live in the community and they are allowed to work under policy changes introduced by the Rudd government.

Experts say few Australians understand that the boat people represent just a small fraction of our refugee intake - and these asylum-seekers are unfairly vilified by "expedient" politicians.

Exact plane-people figures for 2009 are not yet available, but an Immigration Department spokesman said the figure was likely to have increased at a similar rate to that of boat arrivals, which grew from 161 to 1799 since last year, in response to increased pressures within the region, including the end of civil war in Sri Lanka, which has seen many ethnic Tamils fleeing persecution.

An analysis by The Sunday Telegraph of immigration records shows that Sri Lankans represented more than 28 per cent of "plane people" who successfully applied for protection visas in 2007-08, followed by Chinese (26 per cent)...

http://www.news.com.au/national/asylum-seekers-arrive-by-plane-not-boat/story-e6...
Back to top
 

Nothing is worthy of worship except God Almighty - our Creator!
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: Should Australia become a republic?
Reply #404 - Apr 29th, 2012 at 3:21pm
 
Experts say few Australians understand that the boat people represent just a small fraction of our refugee intake - and these asylum-seekers are unfairly vilified by "expedient" politicians.

Hey! Abbott, Jones and Hadley only have one line, don't take it away from them.

They represent a tiny minority. What did someone say? At the current rate, it would take ten years to fill up the MCG.
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 ... 38
Send Topic Print