Karnal wrote on Jan 13
th, 2026 at 6:36pm:
Suck on this one, leftards.
Quote:In short:
A draft of Labor's new hate speech bill, seen by the ABC, creates a new federal offence making it illegal to publicly promote or incite racial hatred where the conduct would cause a reasonable person to feel intimidated, harassed or fear violence.
But it includes a narrow defence where the speech, writing or other form of public gesture is solely quoting religious texts for teaching or discussion.
What's next?
Parliament has been recalled to sit for two days next week to debate the wideranging bill, which also includes changes to gun laws proposed in the wake of the Bondi attack.
Quote:Maximum penalties of up to five years imprisonment apply, with higher sentences available where offences are aggravated.
This could include where a religious official or preacher is involved, or where children are targeted.
You should be okay, Brian. You're a doctor of divinity, no?
I don't think the old boy's going to be too happy.
Better use up your Paki Bastards before next week, dear boy. A five year sentence is a guaranteed deportation.
You'd better keep an eye on things, Freediver. We wouldn't want to see you do hard time, dear.
Freeeeedom, innit.
We can make a prediction that this new legislation’s first task will be the criminalisation of the cosplaying Victorian neo-Nazis who, whilst voicing disgusting ideas and idealising demonic historical figures, do not pose anywhere near the same level of risk as a global organised and well-funded jihadist movement.
From there, it is a minor inconvenience to falsely criminalise anyone who opposes mass migration.
How do we know?
Because government ministers and broadcasters already make this false conflation.
It is our duty as citizens to ask why the Prime Minister feels he can force through legislation before the Royal Commission has taken place.
What is the point of having an investigation into a terror event if you’re not going to wait for the findings before drafting new laws?
If the Coalition blindly supports this needlessly rushed and potentially dangerous legislation, they are fools.
Once again, our country is being gaslit into believing we are in an urgent existential crisis that necessitates rushed laws that have not being weighed in the court of public opinion. These mistakes were made during Covid to catastrophic effect and it will happen again.
Everyone wants to see terrorists brought to justice and our streets made safe.
The hard and uncompromising truth is that Islamic terror inside Australia is a failure of political leadership that goes back generations.
It was invited, cultivated, excused, ignored, and even validated by the activist and intellectual class as a valid struggle against colonialism.
It is not, in any way, a reaction to free speech, criticism, patriotism, or our Colonial history.
Over ten years ago, out-and-proud ISIS supporters marched straight through the centre of Sydney carrying signs that read, Behead the infidels!
Those people are still here. Living amongst us. Voting in our elections. Shopping with us. Working next to us. Hanging their flags in their bedrooms.
Any legislation put forward by the Prime Minister should be specific in its target: radical Islam.
If this government was serious about addressing the source of violence and terror, the wording of the bill and the way in which it has been publicly described, would have no trouble restricting itself to the ideological culprit of the Bondi incident.
Middle Eastern nations do this all the time. They have no problem discussing radical Islam as a security threat and they do not dress up their laws with vague references to hate.