Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 5
Send Topic Print
Anti-wacism laws (Read 1032 times)
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100476
Anti-wacism laws
Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:36pm
 
Suck on this one, leftards.

Quote:
In short:
A draft of Labor's new hate speech bill, seen by the ABC, creates a new federal offence making it illegal to publicly promote or incite racial hatred where the conduct would cause a reasonable person to feel intimidated, harassed or fear violence.

But it includes a narrow defence where the speech, writing or other form of public gesture is solely quoting religious texts for teaching or discussion.

What's next?
Parliament has been recalled to sit for two days next week to debate the wideranging bill, which also includes changes to gun laws proposed in the wake of the Bondi attack.


Quote:
Maximum penalties of up to five years imprisonment apply, with higher sentences available where offences are aggravated.

This could include where a religious official or preacher is involved, or where children are targeted.


You should be okay, Brian. You're a doctor of divinity, no?

I don't think the old boy's going to be too happy.

Better use up your Paki Bastards before next week, dear boy. A five year sentence is a guaranteed deportation.

You'd better keep an eye on things, Freediver. We wouldn't want to see you do hard time, dear.

Freeeeedom, innit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 116257
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #1 - Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:41pm
 

Political party disbanded:
the end of the White Australia Party:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-13/neo-nazi-group-national-socialist-network...


This is what happened in Nazi Germany -
Hitler made certain political parties illegal and
then needed a concentration camp - Dachau -
to house all the prisoners.
China followed a similar plan after
the Tiananmen square massacre.
We are in dangerous times -
our democracy is failing.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100476
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #2 - Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:53pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:41pm:
Political party disbanded:
the end of the White Australia Party:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-13/neo-nazi-group-national-socialist-network...


This is what happened in Nazi Germany -
Hitler made certain political parties illegal and
then needed a concentration camp - Dachau -
to house all the prisoners.
China followed a similar plan after
the Tiananmen square massacre.
We are in dangerous times -
our democracy is failing.


That's okay, Bobby. They've all joined the Sustainability Party instead.

Freeeeedom, innit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 116257
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #3 - Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:57pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:53pm:
[quote author=bobbythebat1 link=1768293380/1#1 date=1768293668]


That's okay, Bobby. They've all joined the Sustainability Party instead.

Freeeeedom, innit.



They only wanted to reduce the sky high immigration levels.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 116257
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #4 - Jan 13th, 2026 at 9:24pm
 


John Curtin was Australia's 14th Prime Minister from
October 1941 to July 1945 - Labor Party.

Prime Minister John Curtin, while an international socialist opposing racial hatred, publicly defended Australia's "White Australia policy" during World War II, stating Australia, established by British people, would remain a white nation, fearing foreign aggression, though he later showed concern about its impact on allies like the Chinese, hinting at potential evolution. Curtin navigated tensions between his anti-racist ideals and national policy, recognizing the policy as a deeply ingrained national standard, but also acknowledging the need for goodwill with non-white nations, setting the stage for its eventual dismantling after his time.
Curtin's Stance During WWII
Public Defense: In December 1941, facing the threat from Japan, Curtin declared Australia would keep its "White Australia" standard, asserting it was a matter for Australians, not forced by invaders.
Racial Identity: He articulated a vision of Australia as a "white island in a vast coloured ocean," emphasizing its British heritage and racial distinctiveness for survival, a common sentiment of the era.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100476
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #5 - Jan 13th, 2026 at 9:59pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:57pm:
Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:53pm:
[quote author=bobbythebat1 link=1768293380/1#1 date=1768293668]


That's okay, Bobby. They've all joined the Sustainability Party instead.

Freeeeedom, innit.



They only wanted to reduce the sky high immigration levels.    Roll Eyes


WE DON'T WANT THEM HERE !!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 116257
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #6 - Jan 13th, 2026 at 10:09pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2026 at 9:59pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:57pm:
Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:53pm:
[quote author=bobbythebat1 link=1768293380/1#1 date=1768293668]


That's okay, Bobby. They've all joined the Sustainability Party instead.

Freeeeedom, innit.



They only wanted to reduce the sky high immigration levels.    Roll Eyes


WE DON'T WANT THEM HERE !!!



And John Curtin - Labor party - agrees with you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 89642
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #7 - Jan 13th, 2026 at 10:51pm
 
"But it includes a narrow defence where the speech, writing or other form of public gesture is solely quoting religious texts for teaching or discussion. "

Wait a minute..... that's clear 'wriggle room' for the rabid Musso preacher ... UNLESS the courts find strictly that it must be a direct quote and no ad lib ...

God said - go forth and multiply - he didn't say go forth and multiply your enemy dead ... but one man's ham sandwich is another man's halal poison, no?  The Quranites say that their verses of violence only apply when defending self etc .... but when you are as paranoid as any feminist it's an everyday thing to feel 'under attack' for being a pack of arseholes... and tus leap to 'defence' - it is the nature of the calling (being an arsehole). 

So you must resolve who is the aggressor and who the defender - and our 'governments' are not helping by discussing the mythical 'Islamophobia' in isolation, even putting out tomes of 'report', without discussing the very real impacts of Islamic Addiction and Islamic Derangement Syndrome.

Without a balanced review of all these things, there is zero possibility of any real resolution to the very real problems of Islamic Addiction in the West, andall that will happen is that those beset by Islamic Derangement Syndrome will be encouraged by lack of action to control their group's verbal excesses (Islamic Assertiveness), while further encouragement will be given to those by seeing others dragged before the courts.

Clearly this approach by government is not good enough... and ALL hate speech must be outlawed.

This bloke is a Suri....

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 13th, 2026 at 10:58pm by Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 89642
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #8 - Jan 13th, 2026 at 11:45pm
 
Would this be hate speech?
Back to top
 

Faruq_Me__.jpg (23 KB | 3 )
Faruq_Me__.jpg

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55879
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #9 - Jan 14th, 2026 at 6:33am
 
Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:36pm:
Suck on this one, leftards.

Quote:
In short:
A draft of Labor's new hate speech bill, seen by the ABC, creates a new federal offence making it illegal to publicly promote or incite racial hatred where the conduct would cause a reasonable person to feel intimidated, harassed or fear violence.

But it includes a narrow defence where the speech, writing or other form of public gesture is solely quoting religious texts for teaching or discussion.

What's next?
Parliament has been recalled to sit for two days next week to debate the wideranging bill, which also includes changes to gun laws proposed in the wake of the Bondi attack.


Quote:
Maximum penalties of up to five years imprisonment apply, with higher sentences available where offences are aggravated.

This could include where a religious official or preacher is involved, or where children are targeted.


You should be okay, Brian. You're a doctor of divinity, no?

I don't think the old boy's going to be too happy.

Better use up your Paki Bastards before next week, dear boy. A five year sentence is a guaranteed deportation.

You'd better keep an eye on things, Freediver. We wouldn't want to see you do hard time, dear.

Freeeeedom, innit.

Do you feel intimidated, harassed and fear violence, son of Lahore?

Is it the 'paki' or the 'bastad' that does the work?


Would 'illegitimate Pakistani national' be better, worse or the same?





Alboweasel, like all political weasels, commisars and propagandists, wants to control speech.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 116257
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #10 - Jan 14th, 2026 at 6:39am
 
Frank wrote on Jan 14th, 2026 at 6:33am:
Alboweasel, like all political weasels, commisars and propagandists, wants to control speech.




Albo would put -
John Curtin Australia's 14th Prime Minister from
October 1941 to July 1945 - Labor Party,

in jail for 15 years for having a White Australia policy.

You can't make this sh!t up.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55879
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #11 - Jan 14th, 2026 at 7:12am
 
Karnal wrote on Jan 13th, 2026 at 6:36pm:
Suck on this one, leftards.

Quote:
In short:
A draft of Labor's new hate speech bill, seen by the ABC, creates a new federal offence making it illegal to publicly promote or incite racial hatred where the conduct would cause a reasonable person to feel intimidated, harassed or fear violence.

But it includes a narrow defence where the speech, writing or other form of public gesture is solely quoting religious texts for teaching or discussion.

What's next?
Parliament has been recalled to sit for two days next week to debate the wideranging bill, which also includes changes to gun laws proposed in the wake of the Bondi attack.


Quote:
Maximum penalties of up to five years imprisonment apply, with higher sentences available where offences are aggravated.

This could include where a religious official or preacher is involved, or where children are targeted.


You should be okay, Brian. You're a doctor of divinity, no?

I don't think the old boy's going to be too happy.

Better use up your Paki Bastards before next week, dear boy. A five year sentence is a guaranteed deportation.

You'd better keep an eye on things, Freediver. We wouldn't want to see you do hard time, dear.

Freeeeedom, innit.



We can make a prediction that this new legislation’s first task will be the criminalisation of the cosplaying Victorian neo-Nazis who, whilst voicing disgusting ideas and idealising demonic historical figures, do not pose anywhere near the same level of risk as a global organised and well-funded jihadist movement.

From there, it is a minor inconvenience to falsely criminalise anyone who opposes mass migration.
How do we know?
Because government ministers and broadcasters already make this false conflation.



It is our duty as citizens to ask why the Prime Minister feels he can force through legislation before the Royal Commission has taken place.

What is the point of having an investigation into a terror event if you’re not going to wait for the findings before drafting new laws?

If the Coalition blindly supports this needlessly rushed and potentially dangerous legislation, they are fools.

Once again, our country is being gaslit into believing we are in an urgent existential crisis that necessitates rushed laws that have not being weighed in the court of public opinion. These mistakes were made during Covid to catastrophic effect and it will happen again.

Everyone wants to see terrorists brought to justice and our streets made safe.

The hard and uncompromising truth is that Islamic terror inside Australia is a failure of political leadership that goes back generations.

It was invited, cultivated, excused, ignored, and even validated by the activist and intellectual class as a valid struggle against colonialism.

It is not, in any way, a reaction to free speech, criticism, patriotism, or our Colonial history.



Over ten years ago, out-and-proud ISIS supporters marched straight through the centre of Sydney carrying signs that read, Behead the infidels!

Those people are still here. Living amongst us. Voting in our elections. Shopping with us. Working next to us. Hanging their flags in their bedrooms.

Any legislation put forward by the Prime Minister should be specific in its target: radical Islam.

If this government was serious about addressing the source of violence and terror, the wording of the bill and the way in which it has been publicly described, would have no trouble restricting itself to the ideological culprit of the Bondi incident.

Middle Eastern nations do this all the time. They have no problem discussing radical Islam as a security threat and they do not dress up their laws with vague references to hate.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 14th, 2026 at 7:29am by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55879
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #12 - Jan 14th, 2026 at 7:32am
 
If the Prime Minister and his government are not forced to keep this legislation focused on radical Islam, it will be weaponised against criticism of Islam.

Already, we are in very grave danger of no longer being able to defend our culture with words. This is meant to be our inheritance of the Enlightenment.

We know this, because the de facto blasphemy laws of Islamophobia have been floating around the conversation here and abroad.

If we wish to remain the free nation of Australia, we cannot allow our anger and distress over Bondi to empower this government to branch into a tyrannical era.

This is about Islamic terror, Mr Prime Minister.





Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55879
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #13 - Jan 14th, 2026 at 7:47am
 
Frank wrote on Jan 14th, 2026 at 6:33am:
Alboweasel, like all political weasels, commisars and propagandists, wants to control speech.


I am reading Richard Fidler's book on the history of Prague and he mention's Vaclav Havel's open letter to the General Secretary of the communist party in the 1970s.



“If every day someone takes order in silence from an incompetent superior, if every day he solemnly performs ritual acts which he privately finds ridiculous, if he unhesitatingly gives answers to questionnaires which are contrary to his real opinions and is prepared to deny himself in public, if he sees no difficulty in feigning sympathy or even affection where, in fact, he feels only indifference or aversion, it still does not mean that he has entirely lost the use of one of the basic human senses; the sense of dignity.

“On the contrary: even if they never speak of it, people have a very acute appreciation of the price they have paid for outward peace and quiet: the permanent humiliation of their human dignity. The less direct resistance they put up to it––comforting themselves by driving it from their mind and deceiving themselves with the thought that it is of no account, or else simply gritting their teeth––the deeper the experience etches itself into their emotional memory. The man who resists humiliation can quickly forget it, but the man who can long tolerate it must long remember it. In actual fact, then, nothing remains forgotten. All the fear one has endured, the dissimulation one has been forced into, all the painful and degrading buffoonery and, worst of all perhaps, the feeling of having displayed one’s cowardice––all this settles and accumulates somewhere n the bottom of our social consciousness, quietly fermenting.

“Clearly, this is no healthy situation. Left untreated, the abscesses suppurate; the pus cannot escape from the body and the malady spreads throughout the organism. The natural human emotion . . . is gradually deformed into a sick cramp, into a toxic substance not unlike the carbon monoxide produced from incomplete combustion.

No wonder, then, that when the crust cracks and the lava of life rolls out, there appear not only well-considered attempts to rectify old wrongs, not only searchings for truth and for reforms matching life’s needs, but also symptoms of bilious hatred, vengeful wrath, and a feverish desire for immediate compensation for all the the degradation endured.”
https://havelcenter.org/2015/05/04/letter-to-dr-husak/



The Second Amendment in America is the essence of free speech absolutism.

Free speech absolutists believe that in order for a nation to be considered autonomous, the people should be able to express themselves freely about matters related to self-governance without any limitations being placed on speech by governments or the state.



That's what Albaweasel and parliament should enable, not more 'hate speech' laws and thought control.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55879
Gender: male
Re: Anti-wacism laws
Reply #14 - Jan 14th, 2026 at 7:55am
 
The proposed laws are undemocratic, unconstitutional and so vague that they could easily be used to unjustly silence legitimate criticism of government policy.

I can not support these laws.

We do not need new laws like this to defeat the radical Islamist extremism that have killed Australians. [highlight]We already have laws against inciting violence. They should be enforced.

https://x.com/mattjcan/status/2011047022963642447

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 5
Send Topic Print