Australian Politics Forum - The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56169
Gender: male

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #150 - Sep 23^rd, 2025 at 3:22pm

mothra wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2025 at 4:33am:

Frank wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2025 at 3:14am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2025 at 11:32pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2025 at 10:10pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2025 at 7:32pm:

10 pages of fixated radicalized lefties spewing online hate, the kind of hate which indoctrinated Charlies killer.

Videos of Kirk hate speech = 0

Just because you ignore what has been posted doesn't mean it's 0.

This is the problem with someone as hateful and bigoted as you being the arbitor of what hate speech is.

I think Gordon meant nobody posted the context, Sad, but that's okay.

Gordon agrees with pretty much all of it anyway. The need to stop the Great Replacement to save Whitey, the need to let Israel destroy Gaza to take out the Muselman, the need to let a few moms die in childbirth to prevent abortions, the need to accept a few mass shootings to protect guns.

Apparently Charlie was talking about mass shootings when he was shot. He actually stuck his next out - bam. The alleged killer said he'd had enough, he just couldn't take the hate anymore.

So he took it out on Charlie.

Look, it's fair to say Charlie died doing what he loved, sticking it to the leftards. The big fella certainly said as much. His team are now trying to work out how to do the mass arrests. Apparently Pam's been given two weeks.

Charlie's wife seems to be doing okay. She's taken over as the CEO of Turning Point, doing fundraisers and getting the message out there. Life goes on.

Erika said she'd found it in her heart to forgive the killer. That's nice, the big fella said, but he begs to differ. There needs to be a reckoning. Burn baby burn.

In times like these, I feel we all need to remember our shared humanity, no? Life is so short. As Charlie's untimely death shows, we need to make every minute count.

As DL said, we'll need to wait and see what happens.

And when it does, I'm sure Gordon will be back to celebrating hate speech again. Just give him some time to be virtuous, okay?

He's earned that much, no?

A deeply dishonest misrepresentation.
The quote about garbage people misrepresenting things applies to you in spades, wee son of Lahore.

If it's dishonest i can't see where. Could you point it out for us?

Gordon agrees with pretty much all of it anyway. The need to stop the Great Replacement to save Whitey, the need to let Israel destroy Gaza to take out the Muselman, the need to let a few moms die in childbirth to prevent abortions, the need to accept a few mass shootings to protect guns.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100476

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #151 - Sep 23^rd, 2025 at 3:35pm

Frank wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2025 at 3:14am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2025 at 11:32pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2025 at 10:10pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2025 at 7:32pm:

10 pages of fixated radicalized lefties spewing online hate, the kind of hate which indoctrinated Charlies killer.

Videos of Kirk hate speech = 0

Just because you ignore what has been posted doesn't mean it's 0.

This is the problem with someone as hateful and bigoted as you being the arbitor of what hate speech is.

I think Gordon meant nobody posted the context, Sad, but that's okay.

Gordon agrees with pretty much all of it anyway. The need to stop the Great Replacement to save Whitey, the need to let Israel destroy Gaza to take out the Muselman, the need to let a few moms die in childbirth to prevent abortions, the need to accept a few mass shootings to protect guns.

Apparently Charlie was talking about mass shootings when he was shot. He actually stuck his next out - bam. The alleged killer said he'd had enough, he just couldn't take the hate anymore.

So he took it out on Charlie.

Look, it's fair to say Charlie died doing what he loved, sticking it to the leftards. The big fella certainly said as much. His team are now trying to work out how to do the mass arrests. Apparently Pam's been given two weeks.

Charlie's wife seems to be doing okay. She's taken over as the CEO of Turning Point, doing fundraisers and getting the message out there. Life goes on.

Erika said she'd found it in her heart to forgive the killer. That's nice, the big fella said, but he begs to differ. There needs to be a reckoning. Burn baby burn.

In times like these, I feel we all need to remember our shared humanity, no? Life is so short. As Charlie's untimely death shows, we need to make every minute count.

As DL said, we'll need to wait and see what happens.

And when it does, I'm sure Gordon will be back to celebrating hate speech again. Just give him some time to be virtuous, okay?

He's earned that much, no?

A deeply dishonest misrepresentation.
The quote about garbage people misrepresenting things applies to you in spades, wee son of Lahore.

Hate speech alert, leftards. Try to keep the kiddies away, mkay?

Back to top

IP Logged

Sir Eoin O Fada

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3373
New England, NSW
Gender: male

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #152 - Sep 24^th, 2025 at 10:56am

Frank wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2025 at 3:22pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2025 at 4:33am:

Frank wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2025 at 3:14am:

Karnal wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2025 at 11:32pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2025 at 10:10pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2025 at 7:32pm:

10 pages of fixated radicalized lefties spewing online hate, the kind of hate which indoctrinated Charlies killer.

Videos of Kirk hate speech = 0

Just because you ignore what has been posted doesn't mean it's 0.

This is the problem with someone as hateful and bigoted as you being the arbitor of what hate speech is.

I think Gordon meant nobody posted the context, Sad, but that's okay.

Gordon agrees with pretty much all of it anyway. The need to stop the Great Replacement to save Whitey, the need to let Israel destroy Gaza to take out the Muselman, the need to let a few moms die in childbirth to prevent abortions, the need to accept a few mass shootings to protect guns.

Apparently Charlie was talking about mass shootings when he was shot. He actually stuck his next out - bam. The alleged killer said he'd had enough, he just couldn't take the hate anymore.

So he took it out on Charlie.

Look, it's fair to say Charlie died doing what he loved, sticking it to the leftards. The big fella certainly said as much. His team are now trying to work out how to do the mass arrests. Apparently Pam's been given two weeks.

Charlie's wife seems to be doing okay. She's taken over as the CEO of Turning Point, doing fundraisers and getting the message out there. Life goes on.

Erika said she'd found it in her heart to forgive the killer. That's nice, the big fella said, but he begs to differ. There needs to be a reckoning. Burn baby burn.

In times like these, I feel we all need to remember our shared humanity, no? Life is so short. As Charlie's untimely death shows, we need to make every minute count.

As DL said, we'll need to wait and see what happens.

And when it does, I'm sure Gordon will be back to celebrating hate speech again. Just give him some time to be virtuous, okay?

He's earned that much, no?

A deeply dishonest misrepresentation.
The quote about garbage people misrepresenting things applies to you in spades, wee son of Lahore.

If it's dishonest i can't see where. Could you point it out for us?

Gordon agrees with pretty much all of it anyway. The need to stop the Great Replacement to save Whitey, the need to let Israel destroy Gaza to take out the Muselman, the need to let a few moms die in childbirth to prevent abortions, the need to accept a few mass shootings to protect guns.

You forgot the need to accept thousands of road deaths and many more thousands of injuries to protect car ownership.

Back to top

Self defence is a right.

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #153 - Sep 24^th, 2025 at 11:04am

Frank wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2025 at 3:22pm:

Gordon agrees with pretty much all of it anyway. The need to stop the Great Replacement to save Whitey, the need to let Israel destroy Gaza to take out the Muselman, the need to let a few moms die in childbirth to prevent abortions, the need to accept a few mass shootings to protect guns.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56169
Gender: male

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #154 - Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:06pm

Frank wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2025 at 3:14am:

A deeply dishonest misrepresentation.
The quote about garbage people misrepresenting things applies to you in spades, wee son of Lahore.

Speaking of wee sons of Lahore....

Harvard University has reportedly hired a drag queen named LaWhore Vagistan as a visiting professor, who will teach a course in the coming spring semester.

Kareem Khubchandani, perhaps better known by his stage name, LaWhore Vagistan, will teach a course on the TV show RuPaul’s Drag Race, beginning in early 2026, according to a July message sent from Harvard to the college community, obtained by the New York Post.

The university further revealed that Khubchandani, a visiting professor from Tufts University — where he taught theater, dance, and performance studies — will teach in the Studies of Gender and Sexuality program thanks to the Harvard Gender and Sexuality Caucus.

Moreover, the drag queen is reportedly expected to teach his course under the “LaWhore” persona.

“My name is LaWhore Vagistan, my preferred pronouns are ‘she’ or ‘aunty.’ I chose ‘LaWhore’ because my family traces its origins to Pakistan: Lahore is an important city in Pakistan, and well, I’m a bit of a whore,” Khubchandani explained in a 2015 interview with his own drag alter ego, published by Johns Hopkins University Press.

“And Vagistan, because I see the subcontinent as one, big, beautiful Vag … istan,” the drag queen added.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:35pm by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19825 Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #155 - Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:27pm " thanks to the Harvard Gender and Sexuality Caucus Circus" Fixed it. .
Back to top	IP Logged

ProudKangaroo Gold Member Offline The Sandstorm is coming 🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵 Posts: 21748 Meeanjin (Brisbane)	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #156 - Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:45pm And?
Back to top	IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 56169 Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #157 - Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 6:39pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:45pm: And? Grotesque and sinister stupidity appears unremarkable and normal to numpties like you, silly little "intellectual" teapot.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

ProudKangaroo Gold Member Offline The Sandstorm is coming 🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵 Posts: 21748 Meeanjin (Brisbane)	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #158 - Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 9:50pm Frank wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 6:39pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:45pm: And? Grotesque and sinister stupidity appears unremarkable and normal to numpties like you, silly little "intellectual" teapot. If you can't articulate your point, that's on you, dummy.
Back to top	IP Logged

Setanta Gold Member Offline \/ Peace man! Posts: 17216 Northern NSW Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #159 - Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 9:57pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:45pm: And? The articulation of your point has won me over. Maybe.. What was your point again?
Back to top	IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #160 - Oct 4^th, 2025 at 7:49am

Setanta wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 9:57pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:45pm:

And?

The articulation of your point has won me over. Maybe.. What was your point again? Undecided

He posted a Breitbart article without any reference to the source or an opinion given.

What exactly is his point meant to be here?

Is he suggesting the government should dictate what courses Harvard can or can't teach?

Is he trying to undermine the reputation of Harvard itself?

Or is it just another lazy attempt to pass off a copy/paste job as if it's his own insight, when in reality it's nothing more than parroting whatever source has told him what and how to think this week?

Honestly, is it too much to expect actual discussion on a discussion forum?

Or are the far-right extremists on here a heavily protected species now?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56169
Gender: male

Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge
Reply #161 - Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:08pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 7:49am:

Setanta wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 9:57pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:45pm:

And?

The articulation of your point has won me over. Maybe.. What was your point again? Undecided

He posted a Breitbart article without any reference to the source or an opinion given.

What exactly is his point meant to be here?

Is he suggesting the government should dictate what courses Harvard can or can't teach?

Is he trying to undermine the reputation of Harvard itself?

Or is it just another lazy attempt to pass off a copy/paste job as if it's his own insight, when in reality it's nothing more than parroting whatever source has told him what and how to think this week?

Honestly, is it too much to expect actual discussion on a discussion forum?

Or are the far-right extremists on here a heavily protected species now?

You have no difficulty identifying it as a Breitbart article, "intellectual" little teapot.

And the article contained no opinions, only publicly available info first published by thd New York Post, as is acknowledged in the text.

Your knuckles must be well and truly shot with all your emotional hand-wringing over the years. Sad.

My post was picking up on the son of Lahore. You know, the karnal connection. Tsk, tsk Roll Eyes

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo Gold Member Offline The Sandstorm is coming 🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵 Posts: 21748 Meeanjin (Brisbane)	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #162 - Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:53pm To what end, what's the point of your post?
Back to top	IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 56169 Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #163 - Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:56pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 4^th, 2025 at 4:53pm: To what end, what's the point of your post? Gawd, you ARE thick and slow. A true 'intellectual'. Quote: Speaking of wee sons of Lahore...
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 61138 Here Gender:	Re: The Charlie Kirk hate video challenge Reply #164 - Oct 4^th, 2025 at 10:06pm Setanta wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 9:57pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2025 at 4:45pm: And? The articulation of your point has won me over. Maybe.. What was your point again? OR ?
Back to top	IP Logged