greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:


greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2025 at 7:29pm:


You expect me to justify a position you have decided I support. Sorry to disappoint you, so how about answering why do you think this woman is a white supremacist?

Belgarion wrote on Aug 26^th, 2025 at 7:00pm:


I'm asking you a simple question:

Do you think that some white supremacists are decent people?

Why is this so hard to answer?

mothra wrote on Aug 26^th, 2025 at 9:37am:


All they have to do is wait for the page to flip and they can ignore it forever.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 26^th, 2025 at 7:07pm:



What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?

Of course not. You, like everyone else, including Africans, recognise that white ajority countries are better (superior, in Latinate English). That is why the traffic is one way, from brown/balck countries to white countries.
Once you compare - and comparisons are inevitable in every aspect of life, not just in this regard - you establish a rank order of  better and worse, superior and inferior, preferable and less desirable/undesirble and so on. 
Why there are superior and inferior countries (or anything else) is a different although related issue. That there IS a difference and therefore a rank order, is obvious and undeniable.

There is, of course, such rank order even among white majority as well as black majority countries, Finland being obviously preferable to Belorus next door, or Namibia being superior to the DRC.

You are just playing silly buggers about the word 'supremacist'.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 27^th, 2025 at 10:19am:


I am not accepting your definition sight unseen, since you have not provided it. Give us an explanation of what you mean by it like I provided my take and meaning of it. Don't ignore it, it is an important clarification. Do you accept my definition/understanding of it?

Yes or no?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 27^th, 2025 at 10:50am:



On my definition yes, on your definition no.

It is much more about culture and assimilation than merely race. I think Thomas Sowell or Jacinta Price, for example, are ininitely preferable to you, even though they are black/ish and you are white. But Slovenia is preferable (without you in it especially) to the darker Democratic Republic of Congo or the blonderBelarus.


You are just playing silly bugger games as usual.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 27^th, 2025 at 12:49pm:

What?! You don't think that white majority countries are better than, say, black majority countries?  Do you think that African and European countries are indistinguishable?

Of course not. You, like everyone else, including Africans, recognise that white majority countries are better (superior, in Latinate English). That is why the traffic is one way, from brown/balck countries to white countries.
Once you compare - and comparisons are inevitable in every aspect of life, not just in this regard - you establish a rank order of  better and worse, superior and inferior, preferable and less desirable/undesirable and so on.
Why there are superior and inferior countries (or anything else) is a different although related issue. That there IS a difference and therefore a rank order, is obvious and undeniable.

There is, of course, such rank order even among white majority as well as black majority countries, Finland being obviously preferable to Belorus next door, or Namibia being superior to the DRC.

You too are just playing silly buggers about the word 'supremacist, teapot.