Quote:These false, disparaging, defamatory, and inflammatory statements are extremely salacious and have been widely disseminated throughout various digital mediums," Brito wrote. "Indeed, the video has since been re-published by various media outlets, journalists, and political commentators with millions of social media followers that have disseminated the false and defamatory statements therein to tens of millions of people worldwide.
So?
Quote:Consequently, you have caused Mrs. Trump to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm.
Consequentially? No. Being introduced by Epstein is not salacious at all. It can hardly cause Mrs Trump any financial or reputational harm.
Not when the counter-narrative is she was shipped over to the US as a high-class hooker mail-order bride. The big fella chose her in a catalogue. The big fella leaned on local politicians to get her the Einstein visa.
Hunter's version is much more G rated, but alas, not libelous.
The Trumps are newsworthy public figures and the US has a first amendment. Hunter doesn't have any media deals requiring federal approval, so he's hardly likely to settle.
Besides, if it ends up in court, the world will find out about the stench emanating from Melania's pussy. There will be a national debate over whether it smells more like pickled herrings or dried tuna left out in the sun for a week.
I don't think Melania wants that, dear.
You?