Karnal wrote on Jun 26^th, 2025 at 2:56am:


A previous incarnation? You mean I lost a sock?

Yes. You know squat and can't find it.

Leroy wrote on Jun 25^th, 2025 at 12:25pm:


Back at them:




Federal agents were reportedly gathering for an immigration raid outside a press conference with California Gov. Gavin Newsom in Downtown Los Angeles.  Newsom had been scheduled to speak at the Japanese American National Museum in Little Tokyo at the time of the raid, per KTLA5.

Just outside in the Little Tokyo area, however, about 100 federal agents gathered, presumably for another immigration raid.  The Los Angeles Police Department warned of traffic impacts in the area as a result.

Newsom’s press office announced the intended raid on social media:

“BORDER PATROL HAS SHOWED UP AT OUR BIG BEAUTIFUL PRESS CONFERENCE! WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED!” it said.

Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told reporters that “there’s no way this was a coincidence,” asserting that the agents were there to embarrass Newsom.

“They decided they were going to come and thumb their nose in front of the governor’s face,” she said. “Why would you do that? That is unbelievably disrespectful, it’s a provocative act. They’re talking about disorder in Los Angeles, and they are the source of the disorder in Los Angeles right now.”

Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin disputed those assertions, saying that “CBP patrols all areas of Los Angeles every day with over 40 teams on the ground to make LA safe.”

“Our law enforcement operations are about enforcing the law—not about Gavin Newsom,” she added.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/14/democrats-fume-over-federal-agents...


Pwovoca'ive, innit? 

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 15^th, 2025 at 10:42am:

They don‘t want to be doxxed.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 15^th, 2025 at 11:07am:

Are those ICE officers, you unbeliavably dishonest, stupid, repulsive creep?  Er... no. You are just being your disgusting, moronic, lying self, unflushable.

(apologies if I left out anything, turd. May I call you turd?)

Frank wrote on Aug 15^th, 2025 at 11:10am:


Someone is triggered...

Perhaps you should be thanking Greggy for helping you face your unresolved psychological wounds and insecurities from childhood or adulthood.

Your anger or discomfort, in that view, is a mirror of your own issues, not an indicator of the other person's objective wrongness.

If Frank won't thank you for the free therapy with all the emotional triggering going on, I will on his behalf, thanks Greggy.

Scoot will be disappointed about what you think of this Trump therapy...

Frank wrote on Aug 15^th, 2025 at 1:54pm:


You can't hold both positions unless you're a hypocrite, bound by your slavish devotion to Trump to cling to those competing views simply to avoid the risk of criticising him.

Either Scoot is right, and Trump is supposedly doing a great service to the people he "triggers", helping them confront their unresolved psychological wounds and deep-seated insecurities from childhood or adulthood, and by that same logic, when Greggy triggered you, he was performing the same "service" for you, forcing you to face your own psychological baggage.

Or, Trump is not helping those he triggers, they're simply calling him out for his behaviour, and likewise, your outrage over Greggy isn't him nobly "helping" you, it's just you taking offence at something he's done, in this case posting an image.

So which is it?

You can't selectively apply both positions just to shield Trump from criticism, unless you're ready to openly admit and embrace your blind, uncontrollable devotion to him.

So, Frank, which is it?

Will you actually answer, or should I just brace for yet another barrage of insults, deflections, and selective quoting?