thegreatdivide wrote on Oct 8
th, 2022 at 10:07am:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 7
th, 2022 at 6:00pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Oct 7
th, 2022 at 3:29pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 6
th, 2022 at 5:58pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 6
th, 2022 at 12:58pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 6
th, 2022 at 9:13am:
Well - if there is agreement that there should be a national memorial that gives a fair rendition of both sides of these minor conflicts, I'm happy to go with that - but clearly this does not belong in the War Memorial.
That was the AWM under Brendan Nelson, acting on intructions from PM John Howard. It was an unpopular view and one protested a great deal.
The new director Matt Anderson has lately adopted a different view. The point is, it was a war, it occurred on Australian soil and it largely concerned Australians and deserved to be commemorated, which is, afterall, the job of the AWM.
mothra attempted to say the strategic aim was 'ethnic cleansing/clearing the land' in the Greater Sydney Basin, but she fell short when it came to the ability of remaining tribes to claim Goat Island and not a few other places.
See how your blind partisanship cancels your ability for rational analysis...there were violent clashes West of the Great Dividing Range also.
As for the black claim to Goat Island in c.2016, that was
2 centuries after the ethnic cleansing in the Sydney area.
I refuse to answer the rest of your post when you begin with such partisan nonsense as above.
GIGO, as is regularly the case with you.
So you totally confuse the violent clashes with some form of ethnic cleansing.[/]
No..violent racial clashes with fatalities were the result of the frontier wars following the Oz-wide land grab (beginning in 1788) by white settlers during "terra nullius" period
"The High Court's Mabo judgment in 1992 overturned the terra nullius fiction. In the same judgment, however, the High Court accepted the British assertion of sovereignty in 1788, and held that from that time there was only one sovereign power and one system of law in Australia."
Trouble is blacks don't accept it, and whites are cheering them on.....
Quote:Clearly you know nothing - since in order to claim Goat Island the tribe(s) that did so must have continuous connection.... therefore they were NOT 'ethnically cleansed'. You and mothra are both totally wrong.
No-one is denying there were black survivors to the frontier wars.
Quote:Are you now saying that those who took over Goat Island are NOT the 'traditional owners',
Afdter Mabo, a court of law apparently confirmed traditional ownership by the black claimants.
Quote:but are just a bunch of scrags that wandered in and thought it was a good thing to get hold of and a government just gave it to these scrag ends?? Jeez - you'd better go public with your knowledge of all this.
Examined and refuted above.
Quote:YOU are the one not being rational - like more than a few others here - you are impervious to facts and rational conclusions.
Refuted above.
Mad woman's underwear, divide - you can't have 'ethnic cleansing' and 'cleared off the land' and still have some living there. Just accept that some of you are wrong and stop twisting like a snake. They were NOT ethnic cleansed or cleared off the land... some died in open conflict with settlers etc, those that didn't take up the spear were not, so it was no 'genocide'.
Either these people are the direct descendants of the original Sydney Harbour Cheeses or that primest land has been handed over to the wrong people for political purposes.
Notice all the savage White demonstrations in the streets about that and the threats to burn the whole joint down, all those Whiteys carrying on about being Warriors of the Australian Resistance etc.... notice how angry people are over this abuse of office and outright theft of National Park land to give to a pack of fraudsters.....
Rioting in the streets they are.
Honestly, some of you are so stupid it's not even funny.
Now to read the article Frank put up there...