Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 19
Send Topic Print
Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign (Read 67631 times)
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #165 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:00pm
 
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #166 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:06pm
 
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #167 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:18pm
 
This discussion is too one sided.

I was smoking, (heavily)  in the womb. At 9 I was smoking a pack a day. Everybody smoked. You went to see a Doctor, the waiting room was blue with smoke, the Dr.s room had a massive ashtray with a fresh pile every day. I know two suicides that wives have attributed to attempts to give up. Offering around your pack was as much social etiquette as shaking hands. When you've been addicted for over 50 years giving up is a big ask.

'Grumpy' doesn't cover it. Long time smokers are totally irrational. Normally placid people can explode with anger over nothing. Can become violent, probably homicidal, though somehow this isn't talked about, neither are the suicidal tendencies, the depression, the inability to think. Smokers who quit are not safe drivers. Every other drug these side effects are discussed, but not for smokers. Heroin addicts get more sympathy. As one comedian put it a few years back. "They shouldn't tell you that 'smoking is a health hazard'. They should tell you that giving up may make you think that the kettle and somebody elses breakfast are conspiring to bugger up your day.

Campaign against smoking by all means, I do myself, but have some empathy for long term addicts who were originally encouraged to smoke by every means possible. Governments even issued them as free rations to everybody in the army. Now pensioners they're charging them $20 a packet.
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #168 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:20pm
 
Grey wrote on Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:18pm:
This discussion is too one sided.


Just what are you driving at?

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #169 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:33pm
 
Foolosophy wrote on Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:20pm:
[quote author=retrac link=1302157225/165#167 date=1302434283]This discussion is too one sided.


I'm saying that you have an attitude that's unreasonable, hysterical, and has all the hallmarks of schoolyard bullying.
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #170 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:43pm
 
Grey wrote on Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:33pm:
Foolosophy wrote on Apr 10th, 2011 at 9:20pm:
[quote author=retrac link=1302157225/165#167 date=1302434283]This discussion is too one sided.


I'm saying that you have an attitude that's unreasonable, hysterical, and has all the hallmarks of schoolyard bullying.


What do you mean?

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #171 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 10:17pm
 
     This discussion is too one sided.

I was smoking, (heavily)  in the womb. At 9 I was smoking a pack a day. Everybody smoked. You went to see a Doctor, the waiting room was blue with smoke, the Dr.s room had a massive ashtray with a fresh pile every day. I know two suicides that wives have attributed to attempts to give up. Offering around your pack was as much social etiquette as shaking hands. When you've been addicted for over 50 years giving up is a big ask.

'Grumpy' doesn't cover it. Long time smokers are totally irrational. Normally placid people can explode with anger over nothing. Can become violent, probably homicidal, though somehow this isn't talked about, neither are the suicidal tendencies, the depression, the inability to think. Smokers who quit are not safe drivers. Every other drug these side effects are discussed, but not for smokers. Heroin addicts get more sympathy. As one comedian put it a few years back. "They shouldn't tell you that 'smoking is a health hazard'. They should tell you that giving up may make you think that the kettle and somebody elses breakfast are conspiring to bugger up your day.

Campaign against smoking by all means, I do myself, but have some empathy for long term addicts who were originally encouraged to smoke by every means possible. Governments even issued them as free rations to everybody in the army. Now pensioners they're charging them $20 a packet.

Provision should be made for long term addicts to get tobacco at a reasonable price. I would suggest for people of forty and over. These are the only people disadvantaged by the campaign against tobacco. Big tobacco simply moves its business and diversifies. Governments wean themselves off tobacco revenue. The long term addicts are the ones left paying for all the adjustments.
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 108877
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #172 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 10:26pm
 
Grey wrote on Apr 10th, 2011 at 10:17pm:
     This discussion is too one sided.

I was smoking, (heavily)  in the womb. At 9 I was smoking a pack a day. Everybody smoked. You went to see a Doctor, the waiting room was blue with smoke, the Dr.s room had a massive ashtray with a fresh pile every day. I know two suicides that wives have attributed to attempts to give up. Offering around your pack was as much social etiquette as shaking hands. When you've been addicted for over 50 years giving up is a big ask.

'Grumpy' doesn't cover it. Long time smokers are totally irrational. Normally placid people can explode with anger over nothing. Can become violent, probably homicidal, though somehow this isn't talked about, neither are the suicidal tendencies, the depression, the inability to think. Smokers who quit are not safe drivers. Every other drug these side effects are discussed, but not for smokers. Heroin addicts get more sympathy. As one comedian put it a few years back. "They shouldn't tell you that 'smoking is a health hazard'. They should tell you that giving up may make you think that the kettle and somebody elses breakfast are conspiring to bugger up your day.

Campaign against smoking by all means, I do myself, but have some empathy for long term addicts who were originally encouraged to smoke by every means possible. Governments even issued them as free rations to everybody in the army. Now pensioners they're charging them $20 a packet.

Provision should be made for long term addicts to get tobacco at a reasonable price. I would suggest for people of forty and over. These are the only people disadvantaged by the campaign against tobacco. Big tobacco simply moves its business and diversifies. Governments wean themselves off tobacco revenue. The long term addicts are the ones left paying for all the adjustments.



Interesting post.
I wonder how many people are alive today because when they were driving,
they had a cigarette, & the stimulant power of nicotine woke them up
& helped them to avoid an accident?
We'll never know the answer to that - but it just goes to show that the
arguments are not so simple.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #173 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 10:31pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Apr 10th, 2011 at 10:26pm:
Grey wrote on Apr 10th, 2011 at 10:17pm:
     This discussion is too one sided.

I was smoking, (heavily)  in the womb. At 9 I was smoking a pack a day. Everybody smoked. You went to see a Doctor, the waiting room was blue with smoke, the Dr.s room had a massive ashtray with a fresh pile every day. I know two suicides that wives have attributed to attempts to give up. Offering around your pack was as much social etiquette as shaking hands. When you've been addicted for over 50 years giving up is a big ask.

'Grumpy' doesn't cover it. Long time smokers are totally irrational. Normally placid people can explode with anger over nothing. Can become violent, probably homicidal, though somehow this isn't talked about, neither are the suicidal tendencies, the depression, the inability to think. Smokers who quit are not safe drivers. Every other drug these side effects are discussed, but not for smokers. Heroin addicts get more sympathy. As one comedian put it a few years back. "They shouldn't tell you that 'smoking is a health hazard'. They should tell you that giving up may make you think that the kettle and somebody elses breakfast are conspiring to bugger up your day.

Campaign against smoking by all means, I do myself, but have some empathy for long term addicts who were originally encouraged to smoke by every means possible. Governments even issued them as free rations to everybody in the army. Now pensioners they're charging them $20 a packet.

Provision should be made for long term addicts to get tobacco at a reasonable price. I would suggest for people of forty and over. These are the only people disadvantaged by the campaign against tobacco. Big tobacco simply moves its business and diversifies. Governments wean themselves off tobacco revenue. The long term addicts are the ones left paying for all the adjustments.



Interesting post.
I wonder how many people are alive today because when they were driving,
they had a cigarette, & the stimulant power of nicotine woke them up
& helped them to avoid an accident?


317
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Equitist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9632
NSW
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #174 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 10:40pm
 


I've heard that a high proportion of smokers have ADHD tendencies - and that they are simply self-medicating...

I genuinely wonder how many of them would benefit from a daily therapeutic dose of Ritalin or Dexamphetamine...


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081021185053.htm

Quote:
ADHD Appears To Increase Level Of Nicotine Dependence In Smokers

ScienceDaily (Oct. 23, 2008) — Young people with ADHD are not only at increased risk of starting to smoke cigarettes, they also tend to become more seriously addicted to tobacco and more vulnerable to environmental factors such as having friends or parents who smoke, according to a study from Massachusetts General Hospital reseachers.

The report in the Journal of Pediatrics also found that individuals with more ADHD-related symptoms, even those who don't have the full syndrome, are at greater risk of becoming dependent on nicotine than those with fewer symptoms.

"Knowing that ADHD increases the risk of more serious nicotine addiction stresses the importance of prevention efforts aimed at adolescents and their families," says Timothy Wilens, MD, director of the Substance Abuse Program in the MGH Pediatric Psychopharmacology Department, who led the study. "It also gives us clues about how the neurotransmitter systems involved in ADHD and tobacco use may be interacting."

Several studies have shown young people with ADHD are more like to smoke and to start smoking at an earlier age. The current investigation was designed to examine whether ADHD also increases the severity of nicotine dependence. Participants were taken from two long-term studies – one in boys and the other in girls – that analyzed a variety of factors in children and adolescents with ADHD compared with a matched control group. Participants completed a standardized questionnaire evaluating smoking history and levels of tobacco dependence in current smokers. Responses from 80 participants with ADHD and 86 controls, all ranging from age 15 to 25, were available for analysis.

While 69 percent of participants with ADHD had ever smoked and 41 percent were current smokers, only 44 percent of controls had ever smoked, with 17 currently smoking. Smokers with ADHD began using tobacco about a year and a half sooner than did control group members, and moderate or higher levels of nicotine dependence were reported by 21 percent of AHDH participants but less than 1 percent of controls.

The two larger studies in which participants enrolled had included assessments of psychiatric symptoms, including those associated with ADHD. For both participants with ADHD and the controls, the more ADHD-related symptoms such as prominent inattention, distraction, overactivity or impulsivity the smokers had, the more serious their dependence on nicotine. A similar increase in tobacco dependence was associated with living with a smoker or having a parent or friend who smoked in ADHD participants but not in controls, implying that the vulnerability to smoking bestowed by ADHD was amplified by environmental factors, Wilens explains.

The study's findings also suggests biological mechanisms that may underlie both ADHD and nicotine dependence. "We've already shown that nicotine-based medications can treat ADHD symptoms, and it's known that the children of mothers who smoked during pregnancy are at greater risk of ADHD," Wilens says. "It looks like interplay between the dopamine system, more substantially related to ADHD and addiction, and the cholinergic system related to smoking is probably important. Further investigations of the neurobiological aspects and potential issues of self-medication should help us better understand what is going on." Wilens is an associate professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.

Co-authors of the Journal of Pediatrics article are Michael Vitulano, Joel Adamson, Robert Sawtelle, Linsey Utzinger and Joseph Biederman, MD, of the MGH Pediatric Psychopharmacology Program; and Himanshu Upadhyaya, MD, Medical University of South Carolina. The study was supported in part by the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Wilens has received grant support for other studies from Abbott, Lilly, McNeil, Merck, National Institutes of Health (National Institute on Drug Abuse) and Shire; he is a speaker for McNeil, Novartis and Shire; and serves as a consultant for Abbott, McNeil, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck, NIDA, Novartis, and Shire.



Back to top
 

Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 108877
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #175 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 10:43pm
 
317



More like 10 million.  Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #176 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 11:00pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Apr 10th, 2011 at 10:43pm:
317



More like 10 million.  Wink


10 million sounds too rounded a figure

my made up 317 figure sounds far more genuine and authoritative

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prevailing
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7169
Stop Men
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #177 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 11:04pm
 
... Smiley
Back to top
 

I condemn Male Violence Against Women
The Government Supports Gynocide
There Is Something Dreadfully Wrong With Men
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #178 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 11:06pm
 
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Foolosophy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1171
Australia
Gender: female
Re: Nanny State Anti Smoking Campaign
Reply #179 - Apr 10th, 2011 at 11:08pm
 
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 19
Send Topic Print