Australian Politics Forum

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › Recent Posts

General Discussion / Thinking Globally / Re: Cultural Marxism is everywhere.
on: Today at 9:40pm

Started by Bobby. | Post by Dnarever

Quote:

Cultural Marxism is here there and everywhere.

General Discussion / America / Re: Trump will bypass the Deep State:
on: Today at 9:39pm

Started by Bobby. | Post by Karnal

Frank wrote Today at 7:15pm:

Karnal wrote Today at 6:19pm:

Frank wrote Today at 5:06pm:

Karnal wrote Today at 4:00pm:

Leroy wrote Today at 3:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Today at 2:25pm:

Frank wrote Today at 10:18am:

Quote:

The Department of Justice and FBI are also in desperate need of reform. Violent crime has plagued American cities under President Biden.

More bullshit from Frank Roll Eyes

The Department of Justice (DOJ) this week released the final nationwide crime statistics under the Biden administration as the president prepares to leave office.

Following an uptick in violent crime in 2021 during the pandemic, it began to trend down significantly in 2023, "including double-digit drops in homicide rates across many major cities," according to the DOJ.

In 2024, violent crime continued to go down, according to preliminary DOJ data from 85 major cities.

That included a 17.5% decrease in murder rates. There was also a 7.1% decrease in rape, 3.6% decrease in aggravated assault and 7.8% decline in robbery over the first three quarters of the year.

Between 2021 and 2022, violent crime decreased by 1.7%, which became a 3% decrease between 2022 and 2023, and through the second quarter of 2023 to 2024 it went down by 10.3%.

In the same time spans, the murder rate went down by 6.1% starting from 2021 to 2022, by 11.6% in 2023 and finally by 22.7% in 2024.

Its cool you did not know.

Quote:

FBI says crime has plummeted to start 2024 - but is missing a big part of the data

However, data informing the FBI’s figures is supplied voluntarily by law enforcement agencies across the US, and do not include major metropolitan areas including Los Angeles and New York, where crime is historically high. The LAPD and NYPD are the two largest police forces in the nation, but they are not included in the FBI data, which could have changed the data if it had been included.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/fbi-crime-statistics-2024-b2561552.html

Thanks for pointing that out, Leroy. Then you'll be pleased to know:

Los Angeles is witnessing a noteworthy decline in violent crime in 2024, with homicides plummeting by 24% from 269 in the previous year to 2023 and a comforting reduction in rapes and robberies by 17% and 12% respectively. This trend paints a cautiously optimistic picture of the city’s battle against violence.

As of 2022, New York City has a murder rate of 6.3 per 100,000. This makes the Big Apple one of the safer large cities in the country. Overall, crime rates continue to go down in New York City. New data released in late 2023 shows an overall decrease in crime — a drop of 4.1% compared to the prior year.

But of course. LA and New York have experienced significant gentrification and rise in living standards. They're the poshest cities in the country.

There is, however, a rise in other kinds of crime:

Quote:

The new police data does show an increase in hate crimes over the same time period. Targeted groups, which include Black, Jewish, immigrant, Muslim, and LGBT residents, saw an increase in hate crime incidents of 33%.

DRAIN THE SWAMP !!!

Yeah, right.
What would state attorneys general know, compared to newspaper reading pakis and Yugo content farmers, right?

Nuffin'.

Oh, ya. And what would the data know, compared to fossilized cadavers who no-speaka-da-English?

What does the data show, paki?

Other than that Trump is RE-elected?

That's a question. What does the data show about the 2020 election, when violent crime was through the roof?

Oh, I remember now. You won't say.

General Discussion / Thinking Globally / Re: Socialism
on: Today at 9:37pm

Started by Frank | Post by Dnarever

In general there is likely about 10,000 White nationalists for every socialist.

General Discussion / America / Re: DEI burns LA to the ground
on: Today at 9:35pm

Started by Gordon | Post by Bobby.

Massive fire destruction:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9kcXaMM3LZY

General Discussion / America / Re: DEI burns LA to the ground
on: Today at 9:33pm

Started by Gordon | Post by Karnal

lee wrote Today at 9:16pm:

Karnal wrote Today at 8:20pm:

You've heard about them in the same News Ltd media you say you can't get in WA.

You mean the West Australian? I have never said I don't get it. The same as Channel 7.

You seem very confused. But that is your normal state. Grin

Karnal wrote Today at 8:20pm:

No "eviro type" has said any such thing. None of it.

Really? So enviro types don't repeat what their selected scientists say? You are too stupid for words. Wink

Karnal wrote Today at 8:20pm:

You've been farmed. Would you like to be irrigated too?

Not with one of your famous golden showers. Grin

No, no enviro types at all. You've probably spent the last half hour furiously trying to find one.

Same as your Winter bushfires, same as your DEI unions, same as your global cooling, same as every debunked claim you've made in this thread alone.

Note how I said "enviro types" to allow for limpwristed disclaimers and endless quote bombs.

Cunning, no?

General Discussion / Federal Politics / Re: Dutton To Reintroduce Cashless Welfare Card
on: Today at 9:31pm

Started by whiteknight | Post by Captain Nemo

The cashless welfare card system was actually working in Alice Springs.

Kids had better food and clothing and there was a reduction in alcohol related family violence.

It will be excellent to reintroduce it. Cool

Member Run Boards / Islam / Re: Far Right Terrorism
on: Today at 9:30pm

Started by Brian Ross | Post by Grappler Truth Teller Feller

.... pales into insignificance compared to worldwide Islamist terrorism against all and sundry ...

General Discussion / America / Re: Women in combat
on: Today at 9:22pm

Started by Leroy | Post by Karnal

greggerypeccary wrote Today at 9:06pm:

Karnal wrote Today at 9:02pm:

Frank wrote Today at 7:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote Today at 2:09pm:

Frank wrote Today at 10:45am:

Completing a course and going into ACTUAL combat are two different things.

Any linky to American, Australian, British, French, Canadian lady soldiers shooting at the enemy on the ground and being shot at in return - ie IN COMBAT.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/8547/9nh7DN.png

NLF woman in combat

A Brief History Of Women In Combat

There are numerous examples of women in combat ranging from the Vikings, through to the NLF in Vietnam and Eritrea to the Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You ARE a moron.

I highlighted why.

How the hell are YOU moderating Defence, having ZERO ****ing idea about anything to do with defence, the military or geopolitics.

You are an idiot out of your depth in every discussion. You have no idea, no words, no articulation. You are a moron with no redeeming features.

A complete kvvnt.

Says the old boy who slavishly supports Pete Hegseth for Defence Secretary.

YOU.

I'm guessing he's a Tulsi fan too.

"Donald Trump’s pick for director of national intelligence couldn’t clearly say what the director of national intelligence actually does, according to a new report in the Wall Street Journal.

"Meeting with Senate Republicans ahead of her confirmation hearings, Tulsi Gabbard, the former Democratic representative turned MAGA loyalist, failed to articulate what the job she’d been nominated for entails. She also didn’t know the difference between key surveillance powers, according to the report."

But of course! One in all in, innit.

The old boy's in deep. He 's most obedient. He offered to shave his own head for the lobotomy, poor thing.

This won't hurt a bit, they said. To this day, the old boy doesn't feel a thing at all.

He just convulses around, frothing at the mouth. Quite harmless, really.

A "cautionary tale", as SM likes to say.

General Discussion / America / Re: DEI burns LA to the ground
on: Today at 9:16pm

Started by Gordon | Post by lee

Karnal wrote Today at 8:20pm:

You've heard about them in the same News Ltd media you say you can't get in WA.

You mean the West Australian? I have never said I don't get it. The same as Channel 7.

You seem very confused. But that is your normal state. Grin

Karnal wrote Today at 8:20pm:

No "eviro type" has said any such thing. None of it.

Really? So enviro types don't repeat what their selected scientists say? You are too stupid for words. Wink

Karnal wrote Today at 8:20pm:

You've been farmed. Would you like to be irrigated too?

Not with one of your famous golden showers. Grin

General Discussion / America / Re: Can one man
on: Today at 9:13pm

Started by Leroy | Post by Karnal

Frank wrote Today at 7:33pm:

SadKangaroo wrote Today at 1:32pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 14^th, 2025 at 8:59pm:

be an industry.

There seems to be quite a lot of people that work in the Trump industry, there must be hundreds of people that rely solely on Donald Trump for employment. Hundreds of utubers, legacy media pundits, public speakers, Comedians, reporters, talk show hosts, cameramen and many more.

Can anyone remember a single day in the last ten years where Trump has not dominated the news cycle. Everyone talks about him, there is even a disease named after his detractors. Books by the hundreds, Trump must be the most written about person to have ever lived. He is being engraved into history.

The only ones who truly rely on Trump are the grifters.

Comedians, speakers, journalists, whether new media or legacy outlets, have a vast array of material to work with. Sure, Trump’s antics make for low-hanging fruitm he’s a deliberate lightning rod, designed to provoke and grab attention. But the notion that all critique or commentary revolves around him is absurd. He’s convenient, not essential.

The grifters, however, need him desperately. These purveyors of misinformation and outright falsehoods thrive on the outrage economy. Their livelihoods depend on stoking division, spreading lies, and milking engagement metrics to push ads, merch, and affiliate schemes. Without Trump’s constant trolling to fuel their fire, they’d be left floundering.

Nobody cares who they are or what they have to say, unless they're talking about Trump.

Trump himself is the ultimate outrage generator. From the outset, he recognised the power of trolling as a pathway to free publicity. His strategy is transparent: provoke, divide, repeat. This is the bedrock of his popularity and why certain types are drawn to him. Among them are those whose lives are consumed by what many argue is the real Trump Derangement Syndrome.

A blind, fanatical devotion that sees any criticism of him as a personal attack. For some, this manifests in extreme ways, including acts of violence or even domestic terrorism under the guise of defending their idol.

So while Trump may simplify certain jobs, be it comedy, commentary, or criticism, the only people truly dependent on him are the grifters who exploit his base and further radicalise its most unstable elements.

Your attempt to frame this as some kind of badge of honour for Trump reeks of the unhealthy obsession you’re projecting onto others. That relentless need to reframe everything he does as a success? It’s not just misguided, it’s a glaring symptom of your own case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Moronic nonsense.

Trump is a response. You morons ignore that.

And if you are probed on WHY Trump has emerged, you all go yeah but not no but mongs.

WHY has Trump - Meloni, Orban, Wilders, Le Pen, AfD etc, etc - come to the fore?

Please explain.

Good show, dear boy. Why has your One Nation prophetess come to the fore?

We could go all honest and explain the role of Vlad in election meddling and the propagation of fake news, but why bother with that?

Truth is so 2016, no?

No, you're here to sell such fake news. It's just what you're here for.

If we didn't have you, dear chap, we'd have to make you up.

Always absolutely never ever.

Top of this page