lee wrote Today at 2:26pm:

Isn’t that the point of a trial?

The defence can raise objections where necessary,

The Mullahs of Iran, have the opinion [it seems] that they can, and that they ought to have the right to,
impose death, on whoever they will.

And they have the opinion that in doing so,
that no one can, nor has any right to,
impose any cost upon them.


Same for Hezbollah.

Same for the HAMAS.

Same for the Houtis.


INSANE, irrational.


But some people, sane people.....do posit a different opinion.

And imo, the damage to Iran, if it comes, is not down to Donald J Trump, or down to anyone else.

And if any damage and destruction comes upon Iran, and upon its people, and upon its Mullahs,
that damage and destruction coming upon Iran,
is the 'gift' solely of the Mullahs.




Pi ssing  into  the  wind.


'A hard rain is going to fall.'


The Mullahs have a learning to learn.....
and reality is a teacher.

MeisterEckhart wrote Today at 1:17pm:



How can you empanel a jury, when the facts of the case are in doubt?

What about windmills?

Will we still get the windmills?

We need  a fleet of sailboats to transport our goods and trade

Complement our 18th century power plans perfectly!!

Leroy wrote Today at 2:01pm:

Reputable news orgs stand by their ethics in protecting their sources…

All Patel has done is alert the entire world about the issue.

Given his time on Rogan where he expressed his surprise that he’d been offered the job, indicates that even he didn’t think he was qualified for worthy of it…

Leroy wrote Today at 2:01pm:


Incorrect. The US legal system enshrines Reporter's privilege.

Furthermore, 49 states and the District of Columbia have enacted statutes called shield laws protecting journalists' anonymous sources.[3] Wyoming is the only state without a shield law, though the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press says this is likely because state courts rarely subpoena news organizations.[4]

Ever get the feeling you've been farmed?

lee wrote Yesterday at 7:38pm:


Gone - back to where they came from.

Well worth watching this in full…

The Alantic will have to identify their sources, Patel will find out who made these anonymous stories. It's not about winning the case but identifying who made these stories and sold them onto the Alantic.

There will be some nervous people knowing they are about to be named.

greggerypeccary wrote Today at 12:26pm:


It's rather shocking. Check out the look of absolute bewilderment in his eyes. It's as if he's told the buffet's closed or he needs to wait for another golf party to play through.

Imagine if any other prez tried to justify letters and numbers typed onto a photo being a tattoo - not just once, but repeatedly, doubling down in multiple Truth Social posts and FAKE NEWS rants.

The defence from the apologists at the time was their grandparents don't understand Photoshop either, so who cares?

This, remember, is a prez who takes briefings from Bibi in the Situation Room - who has private meetings with Vlad in the Beast - who dismisses reports from his own Director of National Intelligence, preferring to "trust his own gut".

Biden never fell for foreign counter-intelligence. His one great error was stuttering during a presidential debate. That one saw the Dems berated for two years for hushing up a national emergency by the likes of Piers Morgan et al, but do you know?

They're now claiming DL has the exact same level of cognitive decline, despite the fact that Sleepy never called for genocide, never started a war, never did anything but return manufacturing to America, created record wage and jobs growth, and restored the US from its worst-ever recession to an economic miracle, the likes of which we literally, have never seen before.

WITCH HUNT !!!