Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

1  Member Run Boards / Games / Re: Waffle
 on: Today at 6:46am 
Started by Redmond Neck | Post by Captain Nemo  
#waffle1450 4/5

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩⭐🟩⭐🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩⭐🟩⭐🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

🔥 streak: 106
🌟 #wafflecenturion
wafflegame.net

2  General Discussion / America / Re: Vance: agent has “absolute immunity”
 on: Today at 6:38am 
Started by Armchair_Politician | Post by chimera  
Frank wrote Yesterday at 8:11pm:
chimera wrote Yesterday at 8:09pm:
'Federal employees are not shielded by immunity .



Great. Sue.

Minnesota is saying the FBI is hindering the state prosecution. Vance's words shows he is blocking it. Trump has give a verdict of 'innocent'.

(This was the reason for the 2nd Amendment gun-rights for militia : to fight against oppressive Feds. Venezuela is with them and the US Constitution).

3  General Discussion / Thinking Globally / Re: What is international law?
 on: Today at 6:23am 
Started by MattE | Post by thegreatdivide  
Frank wrote Yesterday at 8:36pm:
thegreatdivide wrote Yesterday at 6:18pm:
Frank wrote Yesterday at 1:38pm:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/international-law



International law is an independent system of law existing outside the legal orders of particular states. It differs from domestic legal systems in a number of respects. For example, although the United Nations (UN) General Assembly, which consists of representatives of some 190 countries, has the outward appearances of a legislature, it has no power to issue binding laws. Rather, its resolutions serve only as recommendations—except in specific cases and for certain purposes within the UN system, such as determining the UN budget, admitting new members of the UN, and, with the involvement of the Security Council, electing new judges to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Also, there is no system of courts with comprehensive jurisdiction in international law. The ICJ’s jurisdiction in contentious cases is founded upon the consent of the particular states involved. There is no international police force or comprehensive system of law enforcement, and there also is no supreme executive authority. The UN Security Council may authorize the use of force to compel states to comply with its decisions, but only in specific and limited circumstances; essentially, there must be a prior act of aggression or the threat of such an act. Moreover, any such enforcement action can be vetoed by any of the council’s five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Because there is no standing UN military, the forces involved must be assembled from member states on an ad hoc basis.


A repeat of the OP from MattE.

You mean you do not understand.




As usual you didn't point out what I don't understand. eg:

MattE

(First sentence)

"People talk about “international law” as if it’s some kind of global rulebook floating above countries, enforced by a neutral world government. It isn’t. International law does not exist on its own. It only exists because sovereign nation-states choose to sign treaties and then write those obligations into their own domestic law."

cf the Britannica quote:

(Opening lines)

International law is an independent system of law existing outside the legal orders of particular states. It differs from domestic legal systems in a number of respects etc

Please tell us why you thought it necessary to quote from the Britannica, and how it differs from the OP.





4  General Discussion / General Board / Union Members Celebrating Wins Of 2025
 on: Today at 6:02am 
Started by whiteknight | Post by whiteknight  
Celebrating wins of 2025   Smiley

United Workers Union.
January 1, 2026

2025 was another massive year for United Workers Union members
Looking back over the year, we’ve stood together and achieved some solid wins across all our industries. As members, we can be very proud of our determination, energy and collective spirit throughout another year of campaigning, taking action and negotiating for better workplaces.

Here’s what we’ve achieved together:  Smiley

Won over $11 million in wages and backpay for members
Finalised over 600 workplace agreements
Assisted 1000s of members in individual workplace matters
But as a union that covers over 45 industries, we’ve had a lot of action – and a lot of wins. Here’s a look back at some of the highlights from 2025.

Bargaining and industrial action
After months of members’ campaigning, negotiating and taking action, South Australian health support workers and disability support workers won a whopping pay rise that will see wages increase for most workers between 24% and 44% across the 3-year period, and real improvements to their conditions.

It’s the biggest public sector pay rise we know of… ever!

Other campaigns that saw members win pay increases and improved conditions include (but are definitely not limited to):

Ambulance Victoria support staff won a 20% increase over 4 years
Avalon Airport security guards, who were all employed on a casual basis, won pay rises equivalent to 16% in their first year, and permanent jobs
Laundry workers at Ensign in Perth secured a 10.5% pay and increase AND a paid day off for their birthdays
Members who make Doritos and Smith’s chips at PepsiCo in South Australia won a 13% increase bringing them in line with workers employed by the company in other states.
Congratulations to all members who stood together and took action! A special shout-out to anyone who took action for the first time – like workers at the RSPCA in South Australia and Crown and Star Casinos in Sydney!


Moments to celebrate  Smiley
In addition to winning improved pay and conditions through bargaining, there were a couple of moments that really stood out in 2025.

The first? We marked ten years of union power in farms across the country. Over the last decade, farm workers have been fighting exploitation, demanding respect and campaigning for visa justice while making sure we have food at our supermarkets and on our tables.

UWU farm members have:

Stood up to dodgy contractors
Exposed rampant and systemic wage theft
Fought for visa justice and protection, and more!
Secondly, school cleaners in NSW won direct employment! Starting with workers in the Hunter and Central Coast, school cleaners will return to being government employees. This life-changing win will see the workers who keep schools clean and safe for our children have better pay, conditions and job security. This was a long and hard-fought campaign. Hear from long-time union leader Kath Hadden about what this will mean for current and future school cleaners.

Hopefully this time next year we’ll be celebrating a similar policy in Victoria where members in school cleaning are still fighting for direct employment.

But wait, there’s more!  Smiley

Read on to hear about a few more notable wins and campaigns we can’t leave out.

50 Aged Care Providers (and counting) signed on to Labour Agreements
Members have worked tirelessly to petition their employers to sign up with UWU to offer pathways to permanent residency for migrant aged care workers.

Tasmanian Education Facility Attendants (EFAs) take action
EFAs in Tassie, along with other public sector unions, spoke out and took industrial action resulting in a 3% pay increase and better entitlements. Job security negotiations are ongoing and will be picked up next year, so watch this space.


Educators set the agenda
This year showed the impact early childhood educators have made by building collective power across the early education sector. We changed the rules, lifted standards, and made sure educators’ voices were heard by government.

Together we:

Won up to 18.5% in wage increases
Exposed staffing loopholes with misuse of “under-the roof” ratios and changed the national conversation
Put educators at the front of media coverage and policy discussion with the launch of the Safer Staffing Action Plan, the EarlyEd Quality Check, and a National Survey of 3000 educators.
Victorian School Cleaners held Serco to account
Giant cleaning contractor Serco was found to be breaching the minimum shift hours rule. UWU members identified this breach across multiple schools in Victoria.

Victorian school cleaners won back:

Serco had to back pay over $760,000 to cleaners – $87,000 of that went to 37 UWU members
Cleaners are now paid for a minimum 4-hour shift (as they should be!)
9,000 casino jobs saved
After Star revealed serious financial difficulties early in the year, thousands of workers were suddenly left wondering if they’d still have jobs. But with the help of their union, these jobs have been saved and members at Star in Brisbane and Sydney went on to win better agreements.

This and so much more – members should be proud

This is not a comprehensive summary of the year, there was far too much going on for us to include it all. For more details about the campaigns and wins of 2025, check out this article in our January newsletter.

All members should be incredibly proud of the work we’ve done together in 2025.

5  General Discussion / Technically Speaking / Used car prices
 on: Today at 12:57am 
Started by Sprintcyclist | Post by Sprintcyclist  
They seem very expensive.
Hopefully it is a hangover from the new car shortage during Covid and prices will reduce a LOT in the next year or so.

I was going to upgrade my car but one I like is over $20K. It does not represent good buying to me so I will wait

6  General Discussion / America / Re: ICE Agent just murdered a woman
 on: Today at 12:50am 
Started by Armchair_Politician | Post by FD  
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 7:27pm:
FD wrote Yesterday at 6:46pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 6:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 5:50pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 5:43pm:
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 5:39pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 5:32pm:
FD wrote Yesterday at 4:57pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 4:46pm:
FD wrote Yesterday at 4:45pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 4:31pm:
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 4:12pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 4:06pm:
FD wrote Yesterday at 3:55pm:
They don't identify as police, and they have no powers of police, you know that.


I know, and I said, that they are police, they are allowed to identify themselves as police, they are federal law enforcement officers, and they have the powers to stop, detain, arrest etc. Furthermore, they clearly and legally identified themselves as police before the woman tried to evade arrest and run them over.


We know what you said, but everything you said is incorrect.

They are Border Patrol Agents, not Police Officers.


Greg can you demonstrate for us that they are not allowed to identify themselves as police? Quickly, before you get hysterical again and call it a summary execution.


He's right, Greggery. You'd better calm down and repost our links for Freediver to read again.

We wouldn't want you to get all hysterical, have a meltdown and go into autobot. It wouldn't be right, dear.

Do you have any socks you can slip into?


Greg has not posted any links that support his claim that ICE agents are not allowed to identify themselves as police.


Aha. So you've gone from they ARE police officers to they are ALLOWED to identify as police to, oo-er, can you prove that they're not?


They are police offices, AND they are allowed to identify as police officers, AND they were clearly identified as police when they shot the stupid woman (who deserves a Darwin award for her idiocy), AND they have the power to stop, detain, arrest, etc, AND Greg has failed to prove otherwise.


The highlighted part is correct.

ICE agents Nazis have the power to stop, detain and arrest people they suspect of being in the US illegally.

The rest is incorrect.



OK, so one down.

Can you demonstrate to us that they are not allowed to identify as police?

Also I left one out that time: they are federal law enforcement officers.

Try not to get hysterical again and confuse it with WWII Greggy.


Yes, they most certainly are.

They aren't police officers though - they're Border Patrol Agents.

How do we know?  They said so.

https://www.usajobs.gov/job/853258100

Do a word search there for "police" and "shooting US-born citizens in the face" and let us know what you find.

Cheers.


2 down

Can you demonstrate to us that they are not allowed to identify as police?

Also when you literally say that everything I said is incorrect, do you really mean you need me to ask you one at a time so you don't get hysterical and start calling them Nazis?


Right, so we're not down from they ARE police to they are allowed to CALL THEMSELVES police to they are allowed to IDENTIFY with police.

Move along, leftards, nothing to see here.

Freediver's having a full-blown identity crisis.


I've never seen him so fixated on a word.



I know, right? He'll be forcing us to use his preferred pronouns next.

What do you think made Freediver finally come out as a cultist?

Do you think it was the fundamental legal principle at stake here?

The rights of ICE agents to dress up as traffic cops?

7  General Discussion / Chat / Assistance required
 on: Today at 12:05am 
Started by Sprintcyclist | Post by Sprintcyclist  

If anyone has experience with anything or knows anything about something please let me know.

8  General Discussion / State and Local / Re: More proof VIC Labor are incompetent
 on: Today at 12:00am 
Started by Armchair_Politician | Post by Daves2017  
“People also ask
How many people moved out of Victoria?
From March 2020 until September 2024, Victoria lost almost 55,000 people to net interstate migration. Many of those people moved to Queensland, including almost 10,000 in 2022-23.4 Nov 2025
https://www.news.com.au”



Victoria is an absolute  disaster .

Even the once iconic Melbourne Cup is now no longer the race that stops the nation.

Other states hardly know it’s on or could care less if they do!

9  General Discussion / Federal Politics / Re: Australia Must Oppose US Aggression In Venezuela
 on: Yesterday at 11:42pm 
Started by whiteknight | Post by Leroy  
From an actual Venezuelian from Franks link

Quote:
f a guy saves you from a bear attack, you don't stand over your bleeding shins and lectursplain to him about his crappy tweets from 2016.

You say "Thank you."

And I'm PROUD to THANK Donald smacking J. Trump for this.

But to you, modern liberal, rot of all societies, our "Thank You" is the real tragedy here, because it means the "Bad Man" got a nice gold star. Utter narrative buggerery that rains diarrhea on your carefully curated, elitist worldview.

So, while you're busy writing a 14-part thread about how our celebrations are "uninformed" or "dangerous for the global narrative," we are celebrating because we see a light at the end of a very long, very dark, very hungry tunnel.

We don't give a SINGLE FLYING bugger about being tweetshamed by some prick in a Brooklyn loft. We're worried about not dying in the bowels of El Helicoide. Google that, cońo e' tu madre.

So take your "nuance", put it inside a pineapple and shove the whole thing up your ass. We are allowed to be happy that our dictator is going to wear an orange jumpsuit, even if the guy helping us do it makes your therapist rich.

10  General Discussion / Federal Politics / Re: Australia Must Oppose US Aggression In Venezuela
 on: Yesterday at 11:23pm 
Started by whiteknight | Post by Daves2017  
Are you all excited about the bombing of Mexico that’s coming?