Setanta wrote on Oct 14
th, 2026 at 6:08pm:
If you still can't work it out after this, you are beyond senile.
Quote: Thanks, Setanta. Cheers, big ears.
Looks like we have a problem. The threshold for criminal immigration fraud requires proof of intent, beyond a reasonable doubt. More:
Quote:To win these cases, the government generally must prove several separate elements with a high burden of proof. First, it must show that the person made a false statement or concealed information before naturalization. Second, that the misrepresentation was intentional and not accidental. Third, the hidden information must have been “material,” meaning important to the government’s decision-making process. Finally, the government must establish that the misrepresentation actually contributed to the grant of citizenship.
https://evergreenattorneys.com/legal-world/denaturalization-can-my-u-s-citizensh...Now, we know that Ilhan's father applied for her citizenship. After all, Ilhan was raided to find evidence of his application - as if she could possibly possess evidence of a parent's 26 year old citizenship application. So there's
that.But then there's this. Ilhan obtained citizenship in 2000. The statute of limitations for criminal immigration fraud is
ten years.
So, any criminal charges would be automatically thrown out of court. Immigration cases are nearly always pressed in the
civil courts, with a lower burden of proof and no statute of limitations.
Now, while DHS may have legally obtained a search warrant, they can't possibly prove willful intent or criminal fraud. Nor can they criminally indict Ilhan under the statute of limitations.
Whatever "evidence" ICE whisked away in their photo-friendly boxes, it did not include saved copies of her father's citizenship application. That's a prima facie given.
I put it to you that those evidence boxes were empty.
You?