Australian Politics Forum - The Fall of House of Saudi

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1276
Gender: male

The Fall of House of Saudi
Oct 11^th, 2026 at 9:21am

The Houthi Movement (Ansar Allah)
plus
Majlis Ansarullah (Ahmadiyya Muslim Community)
=
Ansarullah (Arabic for "Helpers of Allah") primarily refers to two distinct groups with no organizational connection.

PLC = The Saudi-backed Yemeni forces (Presidential Leadership Council)

PLC control about 65% of Yemen. Crappy part, low population.
Ansarullah control the mountainous part : Sarawat Mountains.

Defeating the PLC will highly likely next collapse the house of Saudi. Saudi Arabia will revert to Arabia.

The end of Saudi = the end of
Wahhabism is the ultra-conservative, puritanical interpretation of Sunni Islam that serves as the official state religion of Saudi Arabia.

Wahhabism. Its global spread, heavily funded by Saudi oil wealth since the 1970s, has been widely linked to the rise of violent extremism and international terrorism.

The West supports the house of Saudi because Ansarullah are Houthi (Sunni). Aligned with Iran in spiritual belief. Such as Australia is aligned with Ukraine and supplies weapons. Not a proxy as governments claim.

Majlis Ansarullah Ahmadi Muslim men aged 40 and above. The organisation aims to promote a Godly, righteous society through the propagation of Islamic teachings, service to mankind, and the spiritual development of its members.

The majority of Islamic terror attacks on the West are/have been funded by the Saudi backed Wahhabism. Such as Al-Qada. 9/11 attack.

Australia, and most of of the West supports pro Wahhabism, House of Saudi.

If Yemen falls to Ansarullah, which is highly likely, the House of Saudi faces strategic collapse, economic crisis, and potential regime instability.

It's time for Australians to swap sides and back the Houthis+, and the collapse of the House of Saudi ?

Back to top

Racist and Apartheid Zionism is a settler-colonial and ethnonationalist ideology, that privileges one ethnic group at the expense of all others.

Ban it in Australia

IP Logged

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1276 Gender:	Re: The Fall of House of Saudi Reply #1 - Oct 11^th, 2026 at 4:40pm The 2002 Bali bombings were committed by Jemaah Islamiyah, an Islamist militant network with links to al-Qaeda. Saudi Arabia has funded Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) through various channels, although the group also maintains independent funding sources. 202 dies. 88 of them Australians.
Back to top	Racist and Apartheid Zionism is a settler-colonial and ethnonationalist ideology, that privileges one ethnic group at the expense of all others. Ban it in Australia IP Logged

UnSubRocky Gold Member Offline Crocodile Hunter: Origins Posts: 26541 Rockhampton Gender:	Re: The Fall of House of Saudi Reply #2 - Oct 12^th, 2026 at 2:55am Keep in mind that al-Qaeda is an American terrorist group.
Back to top	At this stage... IP Logged

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1276 Gender:	Re: The Fall of House of Saudi Reply #3 - Oct 12^th, 2026 at 3:19am UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 12^th, 2026 at 2:55am: Keep in mind that al-Qaeda is an American terrorist group. What is that opinion based on ?
Back to top	Racist and Apartheid Zionism is a settler-colonial and ethnonationalist ideology, that privileges one ethnic group at the expense of all others. Ban it in Australia IP Logged

UnSubRocky

Gold Member

Offline

Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 26541
Rockhampton
Gender: male

Re: The Fall of House of Saudi
Reply #4 - Oct 12^th, 2026 at 10:27pm

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew wrote on Oct 12^th, 2026 at 3:19am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 12^th, 2026 at 2:55am:

Keep in mind that al-Qaeda is an American terrorist group.

What is that opinion based on ?

Based upon the fact that the United States created the 9/11 attacks. G.W Bush (president of the United States at the time) claimed that the attacks were from a group called al-Qaeda.

Back to top

At this stage...

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20909
Gender: male

Re: The Fall of House of Saudi
Reply #5 - Oct 12^th, 2026 at 10:46pm

UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 12^th, 2026 at 10:27pm:

Based upon the fact that the United States created the 9/11 attacks. G.W Bush (president of the United States at the time) claimed that the attacks were from a group called al-Qaeda.

Osama took credit for 9/11 nothing to do with US or Bush.

Saudis have double the military budget of Israel yet nowhere near as effective.

Gulf Arabs are lazy they lack work ethic they hire foreigners to do all the work.

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

UnSubRocky

Gold Member

Offline

Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 26541
Rockhampton
Gender: male

Re: The Fall of House of Saudi
Reply #6 - Yesterday at 12:25am

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 12^th, 2026 at 10:46pm:

Osama took credit for 9/11 nothing to do with US or Bush.

Osama bin Laden worked for the United States. There was this thing called the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Some of the fighting by the Afghans were commanded by Osama bin Laden -- backed by the United States.

By 2011, the United States killed Osama bin Laden.

Back to top

At this stage...

IP Logged

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1276
Gender: male

Re: The Fall of House of Saudi
Reply #7 - Yesterday at 4:48am

ai :

Osama bin Laden was not directly armed, trained, or funded by the United States or the CIA. While he fought alongside the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviet Union in the 1980s, the U.S. government provided covert aid exclusively to indigenous Afghan resistance groups, not to foreign "Afghan Arab" volunteers like bin Laden.

CIA Denials and Evidence
The CIA has consistently stated that it "never employed, paid, or maintained any relationship whatsoever with bin Laden." Former CIA officials, including Milton Bearden (station chief in Pakistan, 1986–1989), confirmed that U.S. policy explicitly excluded support for Arab fighters, and declassified records show no direct contact between the agency and bin Laden. Independent analysts, such as Peter Bergen, describe the claim of CIA-backed bin Laden as a "folk myth" with no supporting evidence.

Indirect Cooperation
Bin Laden and other Arab volunteers did operate within the broader Afghan resistance ecosystem, which benefited from U.S.-supplied weapons distributed through Pakistani intelligence. Bin Laden himself acknowledged that American weapons reached mujahideen via Pakistan but denied any direct U.S. role in his operations, stating in a 1993 interview that "neither I nor my brothers saw evidence of American help." His primary funding came from his own family wealth and Saudi sources, not Washington.

Back to top

Racist and Apartheid Zionism is a settler-colonial and ethnonationalist ideology, that privileges one ethnic group at the expense of all others.

Ban it in Australia

IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 38125 Gender:	Re: The Fall of House of Saudi Reply #8 - Yesterday at 5:32am MBS is trying to modernise the place. Make it more like Dubai. The radicals don't like it. Fascinating that Saudi and the Dubai crowd now WILL NOT let their kids go to the UK and probably soon to Australia because they think the mosques in western countries nurture radical islam. Says a lot about us
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 122556
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The Fall of House of Saudi
Reply #9 - Yesterday at 6:44am

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew wrote Yesterday at 4:48am:

ai :

Osama bin Laden was not directly armed, trained, or funded by the United States or the CIA. While he fought alongside the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviet Union in the 1980s, the U.S. government provided covert aid exclusively to indigenous Afghan resistance groups, not to foreign "Afghan Arab" volunteers like bin Laden.

CIA Denials and Evidence
The CIA has consistently stated that it "never employed, paid, or maintained any relationship whatsoever with bin Laden." Former CIA officials, including Milton Bearden (station chief in Pakistan, 1986–1989), confirmed that U.S. policy explicitly excluded support for Arab fighters, and declassified records show no direct contact between the agency and bin Laden. Independent analysts, such as Peter Bergen, describe the claim of CIA-backed bin Laden as a "folk myth" with no supporting evidence.

Indirect Cooperation
Bin Laden and other Arab volunteers did operate within the broader Afghan resistance ecosystem, which benefited from U.S.-supplied weapons distributed through Pakistani intelligence. Bin Laden himself acknowledged that American weapons reached mujahideen via Pakistan but denied any direct U.S. role in his operations, stating in a 1993 interview that "neither I nor my brothers saw evidence of American help." His primary funding came from his own family wealth and Saudi sources, not Washington.

Nonsense - Osama Bin laden was the US's best friend -
they even supplied him with Stinger missiles.

The CIA created a monster that later turned on them -
the same happened with Saddam.

Back to top

IP Logged

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1276
Gender: male

Re: The Fall of House of Saudi
Reply #10 - Yesterday at 7:21am

aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 5:32am:

MBS is trying to modernise the place.
Make it more like Dubai.

The radicals don't like it.

Fascinating that Saudi and the Dubai crowd now WILL NOT let their kids go to the UK and probably soon to Australia because they think the mosques in western countries nurture radical islam.

Says a lot about us

Around 8 years ago the Saudis when massive on debt to fund vanity projects. The sort of thing omega men do. That's not modernising, that's falling into a debt trap.

Now exports, mostly oil, have collapsed, the Saudis have three choices. 1. Live within their means meaning a massive collapse in living standards. 2. De-peg their riyal currency with the usd, upsetting their debtors. Or 3. Do what Japan has/will do, Liquidate their US debt they hold and raise debt rates in the US.

Trump failed to protect S.A against Iran and now Ansarullah, so retribution seems fair.

And speaking of radical Muslims ... Saudi's Wahhabism is the biggest driver of terror around the world and funds Australian Muslim institutes, mosques, and clerics.

If they are not sending their children, it's because they want other children to do their dirty work of suicide bombers etc.

Back to top

Racist and Apartheid Zionism is a settler-colonial and ethnonationalist ideology, that privileges one ethnic group at the expense of all others.

Ban it in Australia

IP Logged

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1276
Gender: male

Re: The Fall of House of Saudi
Reply #11 - Yesterday at 7:24am

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 6:44am:

Hung Uncut Black Muslim Jew wrote Yesterday at 4:48am:

ai :

Osama bin Laden was not directly armed, trained, or funded by the United States or the CIA. While he fought alongside the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviet Union in the 1980s, the U.S. government provided covert aid exclusively to indigenous Afghan resistance groups, not to foreign "Afghan Arab" volunteers like bin Laden.

CIA Denials and Evidence
The CIA has consistently stated that it "never employed, paid, or maintained any relationship whatsoever with bin Laden." Former CIA officials, including Milton Bearden (station chief in Pakistan, 1986–1989), confirmed that U.S. policy explicitly excluded support for Arab fighters, and declassified records show no direct contact between the agency and bin Laden. Independent analysts, such as Peter Bergen, describe the claim of CIA-backed bin Laden as a "folk myth" with no supporting evidence.

Indirect Cooperation
Bin Laden and other Arab volunteers did operate within the broader Afghan resistance ecosystem, which benefited from U.S.-supplied weapons distributed through Pakistani intelligence. Bin Laden himself acknowledged that American weapons reached mujahideen via Pakistan but denied any direct U.S. role in his operations, stating in a 1993 interview that "neither I nor my brothers saw evidence of American help." His primary funding came from his own family wealth and Saudi sources, not Washington.

Nonsense - Osama Bin laden was the US's best friend -
they even supplied him with Stinger missiles.

The CIA created a monster that later turned on them -
the same happened with Saddam.

Again searching ai :

This statement is factually incorrect. While Osama bin Laden and the United States had overlapping interests in fighting the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s, the U.S. government did not supply Stinger missiles directly to bin Laden.

Indirect Aid Only: The U.S. funded and armed the Afghan mujahideen through Operation Cyclone, but all distribution was handled by Pakistan’s ISI. The U.S. maintained no direct contact with bin Laden or his Arab volunteers.

Weapon Diversion: Although the U.S. supplied hundreds of FIM-92 Stinger missiles to the mujahideen, they were intended for Afghan resistance fighters. Some of these weapons likely fell into the hands of Arab volunteers, including bin Laden, but this was not a deliberate U.S. policy.

Bobby, do you have evidence to prove this wrong?

Back to top

Racist and Apartheid Zionism is a settler-colonial and ethnonationalist ideology, that privileges one ethnic group at the expense of all others.

Ban it in Australia

IP Logged

UnSubRocky

Gold Member

Offline

Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 26541
Rockhampton
Gender: male

Re: The Fall of House of Saudi
Reply #12 - Yesterday at 6:12pm

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 6:44am:

Nonsense - Osama Bin laden was the US's best friend -
they even supplied him with Stinger missiles.

The CIA created a monster that later turned on them -
the same happened with Saddam.

Are you sure about that claim OBL turned on the USA? It seems that Osama bin Laden had basically nothing to do with the attacks. There were accusations that Osama's translations were not accurate. And if there were some admissions of guilt, it was perhaps done through duress.

Telephone conversations were recorded of the hijackers claiming to be talking in code about 9/11. For all I care, the counterterrorism organisations in the United States were being very complacent. Otherwise, the counterterrorism units may well be seen as having stood down to allow the 19 to do what they were going to do. I have heard various stories of evidence that the United States government had prior knowledge of the attacks dating back to the year 1982. And the more direct concerns that date around the mid to late 1990s.

I would not be surprised if the United States and Saudi Arabia came to some kind of deal to sacrifice American lives, so that the dullards in the USA would be willing to sacrifice American lives (soldiers) in Iraq to get a better deal with the oil. Lower Iraqi wages. Higher oil prices. Bigger profits for the oil tycoons.

Back to top

At this stage...

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 122556
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The Fall of House of Saudi
Reply #13 - Yesterday at 7:46pm

UnSubRocky wrote Yesterday at 6:12pm:

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 6:44am:

Nonsense - Osama Bin laden was the US's best friend -
they even supplied him with Stinger missiles.

The CIA created a monster that later turned on them -
the same happened with Saddam.

Are you sure about that claim OBL turned on the USA? It seems that Osama bin Laden had basically nothing to do with the attacks. There were accusations that Osama's translations were not accurate. And if there were some admissions of guilt, it was perhaps done through duress.

Telephone conversations were recorded of the hijackers claiming to be talking in code about 9/11. For all I care, the counterterrorism organisations in the United States were being very complacent. Otherwise, the counterterrorism units may well be seen as having stood down to allow the 19 to do what they were going to do. I have heard various stories of evidence that the United States government had prior knowledge of the attacks dating back to the year 1982. And the more direct concerns that date around the mid to late 1990s.

I would not be surprised if the United States and Saudi Arabia came to some kind of deal to sacrifice American lives, so that the dullards in the USA would be willing to sacrifice American lives (soldiers) in Iraq to get a better deal with the oil. Lower Iraqi wages. Higher oil prices. Bigger profits for the oil tycoons.

Google AI:

The Reality of U.S. Aid in Afghanistan

Topic Historical Facts

The U.S. Program
Through the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Operation Cyclone,
the U.S. funneled billions of dollars in weapons and aid to fighters in Afghanistan between 1979 and 1989.

Who Received Aid?

The CIA did not hand out weapons directly.
All U.S. money and arms—including roughly 2,300 Stinger missiles—
were handed over to Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).
The ISI chose which indigenous Afghan mujahideen factions received the gear.

Back to top

IP Logged

Grappler Racist Filth Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 90875 Proud Old White Australian Man Gender:	Re: The Fall of House of Saudi Reply #14 - Today at 12:40am Osama bin Laden was a great name for a boogey man... the face that could be applied to the whole deal to get the campaign going..
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged