Yadda wrote on Sep 30^th, 2026 at 5:36pm:


Correct.

Islam and Muslims must be resisted.
We MUST be suspicious of Islam and all its promoters and resist them.


At the Oxford Union Debating club the 'simply educated' want to prevent Laurence Fox from pulling a Mohammed picture from an envelope.





Of course the buggers want to Islamise the West. Of course they want to impose Islam on everyone.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2026 at 10:54am:


Were there signs up in the shop saying "All customers MUST line up in gender-divided queues"?

Were staff members monitoring the lines and enforcing the rule?

What did the store manager have to say about it?

The branch manager, said "We didn't tell anyone where to stand. They formed the queues themselves."

Ah.

Aquarius wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2026 at 1:01pm:


So, they weren't forced at all - they just did it themselves.

Glad we sorted that out.

Muslims ARE imposing sharia everywhere they have the numbers. There are sharia-patrolled parts of Western cities, there are no-go zones, muslims segregate men and women in mosques, supermarkets, schools, muslim taxi drivers refuse guide dogs, anyone carrying alcohol, etc, etc.
They are very far from assimilation, in fact Muslims do not want to assimilate. They want everyone else to assimilate to Islam. An assimilating Muslim is zn apostate, ie an EX Muslim.
This is why there should be no Muslim immigration: assimilation is against their core beliefs. We should not accommodate thrir diferences because their core, non-negotiable beliefs are absolutely, stubbornly contrary to core Western principles. There is no moderate Islam. There is only biding their time until they can enforce sharia in whatever sphere they have the numbers.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2026 at 2:41pm:


Nothing's sorted at all ... except in your tiny miniscule mind.   

Those women would definitely NOT join the male queue.  Now why is that?  Well it's because they know their place!  And as their place is only worth half of a male's, I bet that male queue moves twice as fast!   

In a written statement to the UK Parliament in 2016, for example, Baroness Caroline Cox outlined four key concerns involving the operations of Sharia councils in the UK. Baroness Cox first pointed to the unequal access to divorce offered under Sharia, with Muslim men able to access divorce unconditionally while women require their husband’s consent or must petition a religious authority. Baroness Cox also raised concern over Sharia councils applying Islamic law beyond their legal remit, including “addressing cases of grievous bodily harm which should come to the police and the formal legal system.” Thirdly, Baroness Cox highlighted how some Sharia councils falsely refer to themselves as “courts” with apparent legal authority. Finally, Baroness Cox expressed her concern over Muslim women being coerced by family and friends to agree to go before a “Sharia court,” council, or arbitration tribunal rather than UK courts, due in part to their lack of awareness of alternative avenues for dispute resolution.



Alarmingly, it is estimated that more than 60% of Muslim women are in marriages sealed by a Nikah ceremony but unregistered under UK law, making these women vulnerable and highly dependent on Sharia councils, perhaps as a means of legitimizing polygamous marriage.




Muslim women are obviously, evidently oppressed by their men in the name of Islsm and sharia but frightbat Metho, simpcyclist, despicable creep et al are either silent or 'look over there' when the issue comes up. Why? Because they are lying hypocrits. They are 'simply educated' about this, as abouf everything else.