Australian Politics Forum

Sophia

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10097

Re: Manosphere
Reply #105 - Sep 25^th, 2026 at 10:24am

Gnads wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 10:18am:

Muriel wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 2:05am:

Men in the Manosphere are eaten up by bitterness, spouting self-righteous nonsense. That, my friend, is a guaranteed road to eternal singledom.

I think their are more of that character in the Femosphere.

Honestly. This manosphere/femospere stuff is silly.
People are people! All different nations, upbringing etc.
Mostly people are okay and then those that aren’t. They are the ones that make me sometimes say “I hate (some) people!”

Back to top

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 42365
Gender: male

Re: Manosphere
Reply #106 - Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4
But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 61005
Gender: male

Re: Manosphere
Reply #107 - Sep 25^th, 2026 at 3:19pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4
But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

Federal Court Ruling: The court found that Giggle and Sally Grover, a real woman, directly discriminated against a man who calls himself Roxanne Tickle based on his self-declared gender identity under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984.
Damages: The court ordered Giggle and Grover to pay to the man calling himself Roxanne Tickle A$20,000 in compensation.
Final Appeal: The High Court of Australia refused special leave to challenge the ruling, ending the legal appeals.

So the law says that women's spaces must allow men if the men claim to be ladies.
What a *ucking madness.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Sophia Gold Member Offline Posts: 10097	Re: Manosphere Reply #108 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 12:48am Oh man! This is hilarious! Women are sooo mean after all https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSbN11JDQ/
Back to top	IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 58272 Gender:	Re: Manosphere Reply #109 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 1:42am Australian Sport is Beta Male: Redneck Rugby League Gay Aussie Rules Wanker Cricketers & Yobbo Rugby Union ...as for Soccer? Well they're like our Foreign Legion
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Grappler Racist Filth

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 90870
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male

Re: Manosphere
Reply #110 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 8:55am

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4

But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

You understand false equivalence? And the figures are BS based on feminist promoted hysteria....

Your own figures show it is Not All Men. Stop being hysterical.

Now a good start would be putting all those real cases into groups by ethnicity etc - so as to start to get at the whole truth... and BTW - all this assault on men is half the problem at least.... tone it down a little and stop being hysterical and most of it will go away.

Jeez - TOG hasn't had to throw a knife at me or anything since she suddenly arrived at the conclusion - quote - "Oh, it's too hard to go to my sister's without all my gear - I've got everything here!"

Your see the PROBLEM isn't me - it's HER!

OOPS.... dat ole Wharte Woman O-ppression dere, bro.. while ever dey gits to play Oppressed dey gits away wit ever'thang ... but at some tahm, reality has to intrude...

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36810
Gender: female

Re: Manosphere
Reply #111 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:34am

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4
But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

A couple of years ago, there was a hypothetical passed around the interweb regarding whether or not a woman would feel safer left alone in the woods with a bear or a man. The results were alarming, with a majority of women opting for the bear.

In the hypothetical was included the disclaimer tha this question made cerrtain kinds of men absolutely furious. Rather than being reflective, hey has a rather volatile reaction.

As is evidenced here, where i floated the question to Ozpol:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1714208994

I was warned but still i was gobsmacked.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 61005
Gender: male

Re: Manosphere
Reply #112 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:53am

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:34am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4
But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

A couple of years ago, there was a hypothetical passed around the interweb regarding whether or not a woman would feel safer left alone in the woods with a bear or a man. The results were alarming, with a majority of women opting for the bear.

In the hypothetical was included the disclaimer tha this question made cerrtain kinds of men absolutely furious. Rather than being reflective, hey has a rather volatile reaction.

As is evidenced here, where i floated the question to Ozpol:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1714208994

I was warned but still i was gobsmacked.

Overall, 54% of Britons say they would rather be stuck in a forest with a man they didn’t know, compared to 24% who say a bear. But among women, the bear preference rises to 31% (compared to 42% who would still rather a man), while for men it falls to 15%.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Muriel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 752
Gender: female

Re: Manosphere
Reply #113 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:59am

Frank wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:53am:

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:34am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4
But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

A couple of years ago, there was a hypothetical passed around the interweb regarding whether or not a woman would feel safer left alone in the woods with a bear or a man. The results were alarming, with a majority of women opting for the bear.

In the hypothetical was included the disclaimer tha this question made cerrtain kinds of men absolutely furious. Rather than being reflective, hey has a rather volatile reaction.

As is evidenced here, where i floated the question to Ozpol:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1714208994

I was warned but still i was gobsmacked.

Overall, 54% of Britons say they would rather be stuck in a forest with a man they didn’t know, compared to 24% who say a bear. But among women, the bear preference rises to 31% (compared to 42% who would still rather a man), while for men it falls to 15%.

There are no wild bears roaming the countryside in the United Kingdom.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 61005
Gender: male

Re: Manosphere
Reply #114 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:02am

Muriel wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:59am:

Frank wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:53am:

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:34am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4
But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

A couple of years ago, there was a hypothetical passed around the interweb regarding whether or not a woman would feel safer left alone in the woods with a bear or a man. The results were alarming, with a majority of women opting for the bear.

In the hypothetical was included the disclaimer tha this question made cerrtain kinds of men absolutely furious. Rather than being reflective, hey has a rather volatile reaction.

As is evidenced here, where i floated the question to Ozpol:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1714208994

I was warned but still i was gobsmacked.

Overall, 54% of Britons say they would rather be stuck in a forest with a man they didn’t know, compared to 24% who say a bear. But among women, the bear preference rises to 31% (compared to 42% who would still rather a man), while for men it falls to 15%.

There are no wild bears roaming the countryside in the United Kingdom.

Thank you, moron. As you were.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36810
Gender: female

Re: Manosphere
Reply #115 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:05am

Frank wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:53am:

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:34am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4
But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

A couple of years ago, there was a hypothetical passed around the interweb regarding whether or not a woman would feel safer left alone in the woods with a bear or a man. The results were alarming, with a majority of women opting for the bear.

In the hypothetical was included the disclaimer tha this question made cerrtain kinds of men absolutely furious. Rather than being reflective, hey has a rather volatile reaction.

As is evidenced here, where i floated the question to Ozpol:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1714208994

I was warned but still i was gobsmacked.

Overall, 54% of Britons say they would rather be stuck in a forest with a man they didn’t know, compared to 24% who say a bear. But among women, the bear preference rises to 31% (compared to 42% who would still rather a man), while for men it falls to 15%.

Wanna cite your source? I mean, just for runs and giggles. If what even you've reported doesn't alarm you, nothing will.

But go on ... source.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 61005
Gender: male

Re: Manosphere
Reply #116 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:14am

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:05am:

Frank wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:53am:

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:34am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4
But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

A couple of years ago, there was a hypothetical passed around the interweb regarding whether or not a woman would feel safer left alone in the woods with a bear or a man. The results were alarming, with a majority of women opting for the bear.

In the hypothetical was included the disclaimer tha this question made cerrtain kinds of men absolutely furious. Rather than being reflective, hey has a rather volatile reaction.

As is evidenced here, where i floated the question to Ozpol:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1714208994

I was warned but still i was gobsmacked.

Overall, 54% of Britons say they would rather be stuck in a forest with a man they didn’t know, compared to 24% who say a bear. But among women, the bear preference rises to 31% (compared to 42% who would still rather a man), while for men it falls to 15%.

Wanna cite your source? I mean, just for runs and giggles. If what even you've reported doesn't alarm you, nothing will.

But go on ... source.

YouGov

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36810
Gender: female

Re: Manosphere
Reply #117 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:18am

Frank wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:14am:

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:05am:

Frank wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:53am:

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:34am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4
But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

A couple of years ago, there was a hypothetical passed around the interweb regarding whether or not a woman would feel safer left alone in the woods with a bear or a man. The results were alarming, with a majority of women opting for the bear.

In the hypothetical was included the disclaimer tha this question made cerrtain kinds of men absolutely furious. Rather than being reflective, hey has a rather volatile reaction.

As is evidenced here, where i floated the question to Ozpol:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1714208994

I was warned but still i was gobsmacked.

Overall, 54% of Britons say they would rather be stuck in a forest with a man they didn’t know, compared to 24% who say a bear. But among women, the bear preference rises to 31% (compared to 42% who would still rather a man), while for men it falls to 15%.

Wanna cite your source? I mean, just for runs and giggles. If what even you've reported doesn't alarm you, nothing will.

But go on ... source.

YouGov

Ah. Shame is it?

Surely we're beyond that now. You couldn't be any more reprehensible.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 61005
Gender: male

Re: Manosphere
Reply #118 - Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:46am

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:18am:

Frank wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:14am:

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 10:05am:

Frank wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:53am:

mothra wrote on Sep 26^th, 2026 at 9:34am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 25^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Odds of an Australian woman being killed by a shark - 1 in 27 million
Odds of an Australian woman being killed by an act of terrorism - 1 in 8 million.
Odds of an Australian woman dying in a bushfire - 1 in 12 million
Odds of an Australian girl being sexually abused by a man by age 15 - 1 in 3
Odds of an Australian women being physically beaten by her male partner or sexually abused - 1 in 4
But no one considers women unreasonable when they say they fear terrorism, sharks or bushfires
But when a woman is concerned for her safety around men she’s attacked & met with “Not All Men”

A couple of years ago, there was a hypothetical passed around the interweb regarding whether or not a woman would feel safer left alone in the woods with a bear or a man. The results were alarming, with a majority of women opting for the bear.

In the hypothetical was included the disclaimer tha this question made cerrtain kinds of men absolutely furious. Rather than being reflective, hey has a rather volatile reaction.

As is evidenced here, where i floated the question to Ozpol:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1714208994

I was warned but still i was gobsmacked.

Overall, 54% of Britons say they would rather be stuck in a forest with a man they didn’t know, compared to 24% who say a bear. But among women, the bear preference rises to 31% (compared to 42% who would still rather a man), while for men it falls to 15%.

Wanna cite your source? I mean, just for runs and giggles. If what even you've reported doesn't alarm you, nothing will.

But go on ... source.

YouGov

Ah. Shame is it?

Surely we're beyond that now. You couldn't be any more reprehensible.

Huh?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 61005 Gender:	Re: Manosphere Reply #119 - Sep 27^th, 2026 at 1:59pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 24^th, 2026 at 9:43am: Yes and this is with women working in a patriarchal society. A Matriarchal society would be totally different. https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/2103926787549864130
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged