Australian Politics Forum

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 154891 Gender:	What is he? Aug 18^th, 2026 at 9:02pm
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 57285 Gender:	Re: What is he? Reply #1 - Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:23pm The rest of the rag goes on about UFO abductions and Bigfoot sightings
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 29423
Gender: male

Re: What is he?
Reply #2 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:44am

Jasin wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:23pm:

The rest of the rag goes on about UFO abductions and Bigfoot sightings

Sorry - how about this? Does the source really change the substance in this instance? He fought it in court, lost and was ordered to pay. Then he appealed again and lost. Then he appealed against the appeal and lost again. He's an adjudicated rapist and a liar and has to cough up the money. He belongs in prison.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59755
Gender: male

Re: What is he?
Reply #3 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:59am

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:44am:

Jasin wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:23pm:

The rest of the rag goes on about UFO abductions and Bigfoot sightings

Sorry - how about this? Does the source really change the substance in this instance? He fought it in court, lost and was ordered to pay. Then he appealed again and lost. Then he appealed against the appeal and lost again. He's an adjudicated rapist and a liar and has to cough up the money. He belongs in prison.

Civil case, decided by a judge, instructing a jury. No criminal conviction.
Based on a woman's say-so about something decades ago which she only brought up in a bok she needed to sell - and a book you wouldnt have even heard about ( and which nobody here has read) without this case.

The evidence for Trump sticling his finger up her coochie 30 years ago in a luxury department store's women's change room? Non-existent.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154891
Gender: male

Re: What is he?
Reply #4 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:03am

Jasin wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:23pm:

The rest of the rag goes on about UFO abductions and Bigfoot sightings

Carroll v. Trump, No. 23-793 (2d Cir. 2024)

In this case, after a nine-day trial, a jury found that plaintiff-appellee E. Jean Carroll was sexually abused by defendant-appellant Donald J. Trump at the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan in 1996.

The jury also found that Mr. Trump defamed her in statements he made in 2022.

The jury awarded Ms. Carroll a total of $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

tallowood Gold Member Offline Израиль Навсегда Posts: 8842 Gender:	Re: What is he? Reply #5 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:20am Where are the action photos and videos?
Back to top	עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 154891 Gender:	Re: What is he? Reply #6 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:23am tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:20am: Where are the action photos and videos? You're using a carriage service to request a video depicting rape. I'm pretty sure that's illegal.
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

tallowood Gold Member Offline Израиль Навсегда Posts: 8842 Gender:	Re: What is he? Reply #7 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:29am greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:23am: tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:20am: Where are the action photos and videos? You're using a carriage service to request a video depicting rape. I'm pretty sure that's illegal. and I am sure that this topic is typical leftard bs without proof
Back to top	עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154891
Gender: male

Re: What is he?
Reply #8 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:35am

tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:29am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:23am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:20am:

Where are the action photos and videos?

You're using a carriage service to request a video depicting rape.

I'm pretty sure that's illegal.

and I am sure that this topic is typical leftard bs without proof Grin

au contraire

The jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll and defamed her in his 2022 statements.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

tallowood

Gold Member

Offline

Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8842
Gender: male

Re: What is he?
Reply #9 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:39am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:35am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:29am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:23am:

tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:20am:

Where are the action photos and videos?

You're using a carriage service to request a video depicting rape.

I'm pretty sure that's illegal.

and I am sure that this topic is typical leftard bs without proof Grin

au contraire

The jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll and defamed her in his 2022 statements.

Absence of photo/video evidence makes it bs.

Back to top

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154891
Gender: male

Re: What is he?
Reply #10 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:40am

Frank wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:59am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:44am:

Jasin wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:23pm:

The rest of the rag goes on about UFO abductions and Bigfoot sightings

Sorry - how about this? Does the source really change the substance in this instance? He fought it in court, lost and was ordered to pay. Then he appealed again and lost. Then he appealed against the appeal and lost again. He's an adjudicated rapist and a liar and has to cough up the money. He belongs in prison.

Civil case, decided by a judge, instructing a jury. No criminal conviction.
Based on a woman's say-so about something decades ago which she only brought up in a bok she needed to sell - and a book you wouldnt have even heard about ( and which nobody here has read) without this case.

The evidence for Trump sticling his finger up her coochie 30 years ago in a luxury department store's women's change room? Non-existent.

au contraire

I. The Evidence Presented at Trial

We summarize the evidence presented to the jury regarding the charged 1996 assault and 2022 defamation of Ms. Carroll.

Ms. Carroll pushed Mr. Trump back, but "he thrust [her] backagainst the wall again," causing her to " bang[] [her] head again." Id. at 1597. With his shoulder and the whole weight of his body against her, Mr. Trump held her against the wall, kissed her, pulled down her tights, and stuck his fingers into her vagina -- until Ms. Carroll managed to get a knee up and push him back off of her.1 She immediately "exited the room" and left the store "as quickly as [she] could." Id. at 1601. The encounter lasted just a few minutes.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

tallowood

Gold Member

Offline

Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8842
Gender: male

Re: What is he?
Reply #11 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:56am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 10:40am:

Frank wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:59am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:44am:

Jasin wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:23pm:

The rest of the rag goes on about UFO abductions and Bigfoot sightings

Sorry - how about this? Does the source really change the substance in this instance? He fought it in court, lost and was ordered to pay. Then he appealed again and lost. Then he appealed against the appeal and lost again. He's an adjudicated rapist and a liar and has to cough up the money. He belongs in prison.

Civil case, decided by a judge, instructing a jury. No criminal conviction.
Based on a woman's say-so about something decades ago which she only brought up in a bok she needed to sell - and a book you wouldnt have even heard about ( and which nobody here has read) without this case.

The evidence for Trump sticling his finger up her coochie 30 years ago in a luxury department store's women's change room? Non-existent.

au contraire

I. The Evidence Presented at Trial

We summarize the evidence presented to the jury regarding the charged 1996 assault and 2022 defamation of Ms. Carroll.

Ms. Carroll pushed Mr. Trump back, but "he thrust [her] backagainst the wall again," causing her to " bang[] [her] head again." Id. at 1597. With his shoulder and the whole weight of his body against her, Mr. Trump held her against the wall, kissed her, pulled down her tights, and stuck his fingers into her vagina -- until Ms. Carroll managed to get a knee up and push him back off of her.1 She immediately "exited the room" and left the store "as quickly as [she] could." Id. at 1601. The encounter lasted just a few minutes.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

Absence of photo/video evidence makes it bs.

Back to top

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154891
Gender: male

Re: What is he?
Reply #12 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:00am

Frank wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:59am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:44am:

Jasin wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:23pm:

The rest of the rag goes on about UFO abductions and Bigfoot sightings

Sorry - how about this? Does the source really change the substance in this instance? He fought it in court, lost and was ordered to pay. Then he appealed again and lost. Then he appealed against the appeal and lost again. He's an adjudicated rapist and a liar and has to cough up the money. He belongs in prison.

Civil case, decided by a judge, instructing a jury. No criminal conviction.
Based on a woman's say-so about something decades ago which she only brought up in a bok she needed to sell - and a book you wouldnt have even heard about ( and which nobody here has read) without this case.

The evidence for Trump sticling his finger up her coochie 30 years ago in a luxury department store's women's change room? Non-existent.

au contraire

I. The Evidence Presented at Trial

We summarize the evidence presented to the jury regarding the charged 1996 assault and 2022 defamation of Ms. Carroll.

Ms. Carroll pushed Mr. Trump back, but "he thrust [her] backagainst the wall again," causing her to " bang[] [her] head again." Id. at 1597. With his shoulder and the whole weight of his body against her, Mr. Trump held her against the wall, kissed her, pulled down her tights, and stuck his fingers into her vagina -- until Ms. Carroll managed to get a knee up and push him back off of her.1 She immediately "exited the room" and left the store "as quickly as [she] could." Id. at 1601. The encounter lasted just a few minutes.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

tallowood

Gold Member

Offline

Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8842
Gender: male

Re: What is he?
Reply #13 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:04am

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:00am:

Frank wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:59am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:44am:

Jasin wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:23pm:

The rest of the rag goes on about UFO abductions and Bigfoot sightings

Sorry - how about this? Does the source really change the substance in this instance? He fought it in court, lost and was ordered to pay. Then he appealed again and lost. Then he appealed against the appeal and lost again. He's an adjudicated rapist and a liar and has to cough up the money. He belongs in prison.

Civil case, decided by a judge, instructing a jury. No criminal conviction.
Based on a woman's say-so about something decades ago which she only brought up in a bok she needed to sell - and a book you wouldnt have even heard about ( and which nobody here has read) without this case.

The evidence for Trump sticling his finger up her coochie 30 years ago in a luxury department store's women's change room? Non-existent.

au contraire

I. The Evidence Presented at Trial

We summarize the evidence presented to the jury regarding the charged 1996 assault and 2022 defamation of Ms. Carroll.

Ms. Carroll pushed Mr. Trump back, but "he thrust [her] backagainst the wall again," causing her to " bang[] [her] head again." Id. at 1597. With his shoulder and the whole weight of his body against her, Mr. Trump held her against the wall, kissed her, pulled down her tights, and stuck his fingers into her vagina -- until Ms. Carroll managed to get a knee up and push him back off of her.1 She immediately "exited the room" and left the store "as quickly as [she] could." Id. at 1601. The encounter lasted just a few minutes.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

Absence of photo/video evidence makes it bs.

Back to top

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי

IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103732

Re: What is he?
Reply #14 - Aug 19^th, 2026 at 12:41pm

tallowood wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:04am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 11:00am:

Frank wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:59am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19^th, 2026 at 9:44am:

Jasin wrote on Aug 18^th, 2026 at 10:23pm:

The rest of the rag goes on about UFO abductions and Bigfoot sightings

Sorry - how about this? Does the source really change the substance in this instance? He fought it in court, lost and was ordered to pay. Then he appealed again and lost. Then he appealed against the appeal and lost again. He's an adjudicated rapist and a liar and has to cough up the money. He belongs in prison.

Civil case, decided by a judge, instructing a jury. No criminal conviction.
Based on a woman's say-so about something decades ago which she only brought up in a bok she needed to sell - and a book you wouldnt have even heard about ( and which nobody here has read) without this case.

The evidence for Trump sticling his finger up her coochie 30 years ago in a luxury department store's women's change room? Non-existent.

au contraire

I. The Evidence Presented at Trial

We summarize the evidence presented to the jury regarding the charged 1996 assault and 2022 defamation of Ms. Carroll.

Ms. Carroll pushed Mr. Trump back, but "he thrust [her] backagainst the wall again," causing her to " bang[] [her] head again." Id. at 1597. With his shoulder and the whole weight of his body against her, Mr. Trump held her against the wall, kissed her, pulled down her tights, and stuck his fingers into her vagina -- until Ms. Carroll managed to get a knee up and push him back off of her.1 She immediately "exited the room" and left the store "as quickly as [she] could." Id. at 1601. The encounter lasted just a few minutes.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg

Absence of photo/video evidence makes it bs.

Come come, Tallow. If there were pics, you'd call them fakes, you know that.

This is the level you've reduced yourself to.

You.

Back to top

IP Logged