|
Paki gob on a stick
|
Frank wrote on Aug 19 th, 2026 at 4:28pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 19 th, 2026 at 2:02pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18 th, 2026 at 10:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18 th, 2026 at 8:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18 th, 2026 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18 th, 2026 at 7:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 18 th, 2026 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 18 th, 2026 at 10:54am: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. Dishonest? The jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it."The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? Slowly, dimwitted village creep, slowly. Sound it out if it help: You dishonest, grubby, lying creep used a 2023 front page to 'illustrate' this item. There is no limit to your disgusting, lying, despicable dishonesty, you skin-crawling, dim, creepy lowlife. The SCOTUS news item is not a confirmation of your dishonest splicing in of a 2023 front page, despicable, repulsive liar. https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpegThe jury did indeed find that Trump is a sex abuser, so why would anyone object to that newspaper from 2023? "A federal civil jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, concluding he forcibly touched her in a department store dressing room in 1996 and later defamed her by denying it." The real question is, why do you always go out of your way to defend violent criminals who sexually abuse women? Is there something you're not telling us? https://miro.medium.com/v2/1*qhwzbDYQWhf8hvj5wlAEqQ.jpeg The real question is, why are you such a congenitally dishonest, lying creep. And when your lies and dishonesty are pointed out, why do you bleat about ' defending' what you lied about. Showing that you are a dishonest lying creep is not 'defending' what you lied about, despicable creep. It is not going along with your dishonesty and lies, skin-crawlingly repulsive, slanderous liar. This is, word-for-word, what we all want to ask you when you continue to defend the indefensible Donald Trump. He is a colossal liar, a cheat, corrupt to the core and basically the worst President in US history. Why do you continue to defend such a horrible person? He cheated on his wife while she was pregnant, for crying out loud, and has even paid hookers hush money! If your life was as scrutinised as Trump's you wouldn't escape a goodish whipping. Or as Hamlet put it, "Use every man after his desert, and who should 'scape whipping?" You TDS kids are emotionally incontinent zealots about Trump - just as you were about Dubya, the 'BushHitler', and Reagan before him; about Howard, Abbott, etc here - anyone you perceive as your political enemy is always your 'Antichrist du jour. Not going along with your mental and emotional diarrhoea and rityal daily stonings is not 'defending' anyone. It's simply not joining you in your recurrent derangement. No one has the right not to be not offended, innit. Except the poor old boy.
|