Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Tucker Carlson for president? (Read 1565 times)
Paki gob on a stick
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103775
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #45 - Aug 15th, 2026 at 7:50pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 6:14pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 5:26pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 3:11pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 14th, 2026 at 5:42pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2026 at 5:05pm:
Finally you agree with me, gobber.


Although we are importing large numbers of self flagellatig Shiites and swarming Sunni sons of Mohammed. A Bad Thing. Ditto the turbaned, the hijabis and niqabis and their bearded male keepers, the macheti artists from deepest Africa and the Rajivs and Chongs by the million. 


Oh? We happen to live, work and dine with these swarthies, old boy. They're not the ones threatening the tinted races with violence.

You.



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HPrbj7vW0AArKkf?.jpg

The stats would be similar in Oz and across every Western country.


The stats are not even the same in Mother England, you poor old thing. I searched your image to check for a source. Here's what popped up:

Quote:
The image presents a series of inflammatory and statistically unsubstantiated claims regarding the Muslim population in the United Kingdom, combining misleading figures with unverified or misattributed sources to generate negative generalizations.

Context and Analysis of Claims

Demographics: According to official UK Census data (such as the 2021 Census), Muslims make up approximately 6.5% of the population in England and Wales, but the specific criminality, security, and social claims listed alongside this figure lack credible backing or distort official datasets.

Misattributed Sources: The graphic lists institutional names like the Office for National Statistics (ONS) or the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), but misrepresents or completely fabricates the correlation between these official bodies and the specific percentages stated.

The "97% of Terror Deaths" / Watchlist Claims: These figures are fundamentally fabricated. Terror threat assessments and caseload statistics are monitored by MI5 and the Home Office.

Official figures from the Home Office's Gov.uk Crime Statistics Portal show that while Islamist extremism constitutes a significant portion of MI5's active counter-terrorism workload, Extreme Right-Wing (XRW) terrorism constitutes a large and rapidly growing share of the remaining threat profile.

No official dataset attributes a "97%" or "90%" static monopoly of threat data to British Muslims.Prisoner Population: According to actual Ministry of Justice (MoJ) prison population data, Muslims make up roughly 18% of the prison population. However, criminologists and justice watchdogs emphasize that this disproportionate figure is largely linked to broader structural socioeconomic factors, younger demographic profiles (as half of British Muslims are under the age of 25), and systemic biases within judicial processing—rather than an inherent link to faith.

Misrepresented or Outdated Points: The figure attributing "87-95% of grooming gang rapes" to a single group misinterprets historical data. A comprehensive UK Home Office Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation Report concluded that offenders in such gangs come from diverse backgrounds, and the majority of recorded group-based offenders are actually White.

Propaganda Style: The layout is characteristic of online political disinformation designed to provoke fear or hostility against a specific religious minority by presenting exaggerated or false metrics as established facts.


So, now that we've cleared that one up, would you care to thank your generous multicultural hosts who, ever so graciously, welcomed you with open arms and gave you every opportunity to make yourself a home?

Cheers.


Yes, I checked out the validity of those stats too and found out they were - as expected - bogus.

You'll notice it says 46.8% are not employed.

It doesn't, however, tell you that 46.8% are receiving unemployment benefits because they aren't.

That figure misinterprets census and labour statistics by confusing economic inactivity (people who are students, looking after family, retired, or long-term sick) with people receiving unemployment benefits.

Frank's apology is forthcoming.


Oh, I know. It meant to say 46.8% are STEALING OUR JOBS !!!

Shurely shome mishtake.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 59829
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #46 - Aug 15th, 2026 at 8:20pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 6:14pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 5:26pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 3:11pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 14th, 2026 at 5:42pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2026 at 5:05pm:
Finally you agree with me, gobber.


Although we are importing large numbers of self flagellatig Shiites and swarming Sunni sons of Mohammed. A Bad Thing. Ditto the turbaned, the hijabis and niqabis and their bearded male keepers, the macheti artists from deepest Africa and the Rajivs and Chongs by the million. 


Oh? We happen to live, work and dine with these swarthies, old boy. They're not the ones threatening the tinted races with violence.

You.



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HPrbj7vW0AArKkf?.jpg

The stats would be similar in Oz and across every Western country.


The stats are not even the same in Mother England, you poor old thing. I searched your image to check for a source. Here's what popped up:

Quote:
The image presents a series of inflammatory and statistically unsubstantiated claims regarding the Muslim population in the United Kingdom, combining misleading figures with unverified or misattributed sources to generate negative generalizations.

Context and Analysis of Claims

Demographics: According to official UK Census data (such as the 2021 Census), Muslims make up approximately 6.5% of the population in England and Wales, but the specific criminality, security, and social claims listed alongside this figure lack credible backing or distort official datasets.

Misattributed Sources: The graphic lists institutional names like the Office for National Statistics (ONS) or the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), but misrepresents or completely fabricates the correlation between these official bodies and the specific percentages stated.

The "97% of Terror Deaths" / Watchlist Claims: These figures are fundamentally fabricated. Terror threat assessments and caseload statistics are monitored by MI5 and the Home Office.

Official figures from the Home Office's Gov.uk Crime Statistics Portal show that while Islamist extremism constitutes a significant portion of MI5's active counter-terrorism workload, Extreme Right-Wing (XRW) terrorism constitutes a large and rapidly growing share of the remaining threat profile.

No official dataset attributes a "97%" or "90%" static monopoly of threat data to British Muslims.Prisoner Population: According to actual Ministry of Justice (MoJ) prison population data, Muslims make up roughly 18% of the prison population. However, criminologists and justice watchdogs emphasize that this disproportionate figure is largely linked to broader structural socioeconomic factors, younger demographic profiles (as half of British Muslims are under the age of 25), and systemic biases within judicial processing—rather than an inherent link to faith.

Misrepresented or Outdated Points: The figure attributing "87-95% of grooming gang rapes" to a single group misinterprets historical data. A comprehensive UK Home Office Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation Report concluded that offenders in such gangs come from diverse backgrounds, and the majority of recorded group-based offenders are actually White.

Propaganda Style: The layout is characteristic of online political disinformation designed to provoke fear or hostility against a specific religious minority by presenting exaggerated or false metrics as established facts.


So, now that we've cleared that one up, would you care to thank your generous multicultural hosts who, ever so graciously, welcomed you with open arms and gave you every opportunity to make yourself a home?

Cheers.


Yes, I checked out the validity of those stats too and found out they were - as expected - bogus.

You'll notice it says 46.8% are not employed.

It doesn't, however, tell you that 46.8% are receiving unemployment benefits because they aren't.

That figure misinterprets census and labour statistics by confusing economic inactivity (people who are students, looking after family, retired, or long-term sick) with people receiving unemployment benefits.

Frank's apology is forthcoming.

And the women. Most are unproductive.
Who would employ a niqabi? (Even if there were allowed out by themselves).


The PARTICIPATION rate of working age (16-64 old) Muslims is low. If so many are retired or long term sick (birth defects due to incest?) As you try to lie about it, then tgat is an even bigger problem.
That non-particioation goes for the labour market as well as the general social cohesion and assimilation of Muslims.

Nothing bogus about that figure, creepy liar. It simply states the fact that nearly half the working age Muslim population is economically inactive.  And of course there is all thee other damning stats about the burden of Muslims, none of which bogus either: crime, terrorism, burden on social security. 

You are the only bogus thing around here, slanderous, dishonest liar.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 154977
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #47 - Aug 15th, 2026 at 8:29pm
 
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 7:50pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 6:14pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 5:26pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 3:11pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 14th, 2026 at 5:42pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2026 at 5:05pm:
Finally you agree with me, gobber.


Although we are importing large numbers of self flagellatig Shiites and swarming Sunni sons of Mohammed. A Bad Thing. Ditto the turbaned, the hijabis and niqabis and their bearded male keepers, the macheti artists from deepest Africa and the Rajivs and Chongs by the million. 


Oh? We happen to live, work and dine with these swarthies, old boy. They're not the ones threatening the tinted races with violence.

You.



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HPrbj7vW0AArKkf?.jpg

The stats would be similar in Oz and across every Western country.


The stats are not even the same in Mother England, you poor old thing. I searched your image to check for a source. Here's what popped up:

Quote:
The image presents a series of inflammatory and statistically unsubstantiated claims regarding the Muslim population in the United Kingdom, combining misleading figures with unverified or misattributed sources to generate negative generalizations.

Context and Analysis of Claims

Demographics: According to official UK Census data (such as the 2021 Census), Muslims make up approximately 6.5% of the population in England and Wales, but the specific criminality, security, and social claims listed alongside this figure lack credible backing or distort official datasets.

Misattributed Sources: The graphic lists institutional names like the Office for National Statistics (ONS) or the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), but misrepresents or completely fabricates the correlation between these official bodies and the specific percentages stated.

The "97% of Terror Deaths" / Watchlist Claims: These figures are fundamentally fabricated. Terror threat assessments and caseload statistics are monitored by MI5 and the Home Office.

Official figures from the Home Office's Gov.uk Crime Statistics Portal show that while Islamist extremism constitutes a significant portion of MI5's active counter-terrorism workload, Extreme Right-Wing (XRW) terrorism constitutes a large and rapidly growing share of the remaining threat profile.

No official dataset attributes a "97%" or "90%" static monopoly of threat data to British Muslims.Prisoner Population: According to actual Ministry of Justice (MoJ) prison population data, Muslims make up roughly 18% of the prison population. However, criminologists and justice watchdogs emphasize that this disproportionate figure is largely linked to broader structural socioeconomic factors, younger demographic profiles (as half of British Muslims are under the age of 25), and systemic biases within judicial processing—rather than an inherent link to faith.

Misrepresented or Outdated Points: The figure attributing "87-95% of grooming gang rapes" to a single group misinterprets historical data. A comprehensive UK Home Office Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation Report concluded that offenders in such gangs come from diverse backgrounds, and the majority of recorded group-based offenders are actually White.

Propaganda Style: The layout is characteristic of online political disinformation designed to provoke fear or hostility against a specific religious minority by presenting exaggerated or false metrics as established facts.


So, now that we've cleared that one up, would you care to thank your generous multicultural hosts who, ever so graciously, welcomed you with open arms and gave you every opportunity to make yourself a home?

Cheers.


Yes, I checked out the validity of those stats too and found out they were - as expected - bogus.

You'll notice it says 46.8% are not employed.

It doesn't, however, tell you that 46.8% are receiving unemployment benefits because they aren't.

That figure misinterprets census and labour statistics by confusing economic inactivity (people who are students, looking after family, retired, or long-term sick) with people receiving unemployment benefits.

Frank's apology is forthcoming.


Oh, I know. It meant to say 46.8% are STEALING OUR JOBS !!!

Shurely shome mishtake.


Yes, definitely a mistake.

Frank will be along any minute now to apologise for posting bogus stats which were designed to create division in society and encourage violence against Muslims.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 59829
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #48 - Aug 15th, 2026 at 8:41pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 8:29pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 7:50pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 6:14pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 5:26pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 3:11pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 14th, 2026 at 5:42pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2026 at 5:05pm:
Finally you agree with me, gobber.


Although we are importing large numbers of self flagellatig Shiites and swarming Sunni sons of Mohammed. A Bad Thing. Ditto the turbaned, the hijabis and niqabis and their bearded male keepers, the macheti artists from deepest Africa and the Rajivs and Chongs by the million. 


Oh? We happen to live, work and dine with these swarthies, old boy. They're not the ones threatening the tinted races with violence.

You.



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HPrbj7vW0AArKkf?.jpg

The stats would be similar in Oz and across every Western country.


The stats are not even the same in Mother England, you poor old thing. I searched your image to check for a source. Here's what popped up:

Quote:
The image presents a series of inflammatory and statistically unsubstantiated claims regarding the Muslim population in the United Kingdom, combining misleading figures with unverified or misattributed sources to generate negative generalizations.

Context and Analysis of Claims

Demographics: According to official UK Census data (such as the 2021 Census), Muslims make up approximately 6.5% of the population in England and Wales, but the specific criminality, security, and social claims listed alongside this figure lack credible backing or distort official datasets.

Misattributed Sources: The graphic lists institutional names like the Office for National Statistics (ONS) or the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), but misrepresents or completely fabricates the correlation between these official bodies and the specific percentages stated.

The "97% of Terror Deaths" / Watchlist Claims: These figures are fundamentally fabricated. Terror threat assessments and caseload statistics are monitored by MI5 and the Home Office.

Official figures from the Home Office's Gov.uk Crime Statistics Portal show that while Islamist extremism constitutes a significant portion of MI5's active counter-terrorism workload, Extreme Right-Wing (XRW) terrorism constitutes a large and rapidly growing share of the remaining threat profile.

No official dataset attributes a "97%" or "90%" static monopoly of threat data to British Muslims.Prisoner Population: According to actual Ministry of Justice (MoJ) prison population data, Muslims make up roughly 18% of the prison population. However, criminologists and justice watchdogs emphasize that this disproportionate figure is largely linked to broader structural socioeconomic factors, younger demographic profiles (as half of British Muslims are under the age of 25), and systemic biases within judicial processing—rather than an inherent link to faith.

Misrepresented or Outdated Points: The figure attributing "87-95% of grooming gang rapes" to a single group misinterprets historical data. A comprehensive UK Home Office Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation Report concluded that offenders in such gangs come from diverse backgrounds, and the majority of recorded group-based offenders are actually White.

Propaganda Style: The layout is characteristic of online political disinformation designed to provoke fear or hostility against a specific religious minority by presenting exaggerated or false metrics as established facts.


So, now that we've cleared that one up, would you care to thank your generous multicultural hosts who, ever so graciously, welcomed you with open arms and gave you every opportunity to make yourself a home?

Cheers.


Yes, I checked out the validity of those stats too and found out they were - as expected - bogus.

You'll notice it says 46.8% are not employed.

It doesn't, however, tell you that 46.8% are receiving unemployment benefits because they aren't.

That figure misinterprets census and labour statistics by confusing economic inactivity (people who are students, looking after family, retired, or long-term sick) with people receiving unemployment benefits.

Frank's apology is forthcoming.


Oh, I know. It meant to say 46.8% are STEALING OUR JOBS !!!

Shurely shome mishtake.


Yes, definitely a mistake.

Frank will be along any minute now to apologise for posting bogus stats which were designed to create division in society and encourage violence against Muslims.


Stop lying and grimacing, mongs.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Paki gob on a stick
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103775
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #49 - Aug 15th, 2026 at 11:53pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 8:20pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 6:14pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 5:26pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 3:11pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 14th, 2026 at 5:42pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2026 at 5:05pm:
Finally you agree with me, gobber.


Although we are importing large numbers of self flagellatig Shiites and swarming Sunni sons of Mohammed. A Bad Thing. Ditto the turbaned, the hijabis and niqabis and their bearded male keepers, the macheti artists from deepest Africa and the Rajivs and Chongs by the million. 


Oh? We happen to live, work and dine with these swarthies, old boy. They're not the ones threatening the tinted races with violence.

You.



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HPrbj7vW0AArKkf?.jpg

The stats would be similar in Oz and across every Western country.


The stats are not even the same in Mother England, you poor old thing. I searched your image to check for a source. Here's what popped up:

Quote:
The image presents a series of inflammatory and statistically unsubstantiated claims regarding the Muslim population in the United Kingdom, combining misleading figures with unverified or misattributed sources to generate negative generalizations.

Context and Analysis of Claims

Demographics: According to official UK Census data (such as the 2021 Census), Muslims make up approximately 6.5% of the population in England and Wales, but the specific criminality, security, and social claims listed alongside this figure lack credible backing or distort official datasets.

Misattributed Sources: The graphic lists institutional names like the Office for National Statistics (ONS) or the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), but misrepresents or completely fabricates the correlation between these official bodies and the specific percentages stated.

The "97% of Terror Deaths" / Watchlist Claims: These figures are fundamentally fabricated. Terror threat assessments and caseload statistics are monitored by MI5 and the Home Office.

Official figures from the Home Office's Gov.uk Crime Statistics Portal show that while Islamist extremism constitutes a significant portion of MI5's active counter-terrorism workload, Extreme Right-Wing (XRW) terrorism constitutes a large and rapidly growing share of the remaining threat profile.

No official dataset attributes a "97%" or "90%" static monopoly of threat data to British Muslims.Prisoner Population: According to actual Ministry of Justice (MoJ) prison population data, Muslims make up roughly 18% of the prison population. However, criminologists and justice watchdogs emphasize that this disproportionate figure is largely linked to broader structural socioeconomic factors, younger demographic profiles (as half of British Muslims are under the age of 25), and systemic biases within judicial processing—rather than an inherent link to faith.

Misrepresented or Outdated Points: The figure attributing "87-95% of grooming gang rapes" to a single group misinterprets historical data. A comprehensive UK Home Office Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation Report concluded that offenders in such gangs come from diverse backgrounds, and the majority of recorded group-based offenders are actually White.

Propaganda Style: The layout is characteristic of online political disinformation designed to provoke fear or hostility against a specific religious minority by presenting exaggerated or false metrics as established facts.


So, now that we've cleared that one up, would you care to thank your generous multicultural hosts who, ever so graciously, welcomed you with open arms and gave you every opportunity to make yourself a home?

Cheers.


Yes, I checked out the validity of those stats too and found out they were - as expected - bogus.

You'll notice it says 46.8% are not employed.

It doesn't, however, tell you that 46.8% are receiving unemployment benefits because they aren't.

That figure misinterprets census and labour statistics by confusing economic inactivity (people who are students, looking after family, retired, or long-term sick) with people receiving unemployment benefits.

Frank's apology is forthcoming.

And the women. Most are unproductive.
Who would employ a niqabi? (Even if there were allowed out by themselves).


The PARTICIPATION rate of working age (16-64 old) Muslims is low. If so many are retired or long term sick (birth defects due to incest?) As you try to lie about it, then tgat is an even bigger problem.
That non-particioation goes for the labour market as well as the general social cohesion and assimilation of Muslims.

Nothing bogus about that figure, creepy liar. It simply states the fact that nearly half the working age Muslim population is economically inactive.  And of course there is all thee other damning stats about the burden of Muslims, none of which bogus either: crime, terrorism, burden on social security. 

You are the only bogus thing around here, slanderous, dishonest liar.


Incorrect, silly Billy. I live and - ahem - work with the Muselman.

Apologize for lying, please. We want you people sent right back to where you came from.

Fook orf!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 17442
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #50 - Aug 16th, 2026 at 2:13am
 
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 11:53pm:
Incorrect, silly Billy. I live and - ahem - work with the Muselman.


Of course you do, Inshallah, no?

Have you asked them about how they feel about the silly old poof they work and live with? I hope you live on the ground floor.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 59829
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #51 - Aug 16th, 2026 at 10:50am
 
Setanta wrote on Aug 16th, 2026 at 2:13am:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 11:53pm:
Incorrect, silly Billy. I live and - ahem - work with the Muselman.


Of course you do, Inshallah, no?

Have you asked them about how they feel about the silly old poof they work and live with? I hope you live on the ground floor.



Yeah - and I would call trouser-sniffing and... er... 'ululating (ahem) 'work' exactly, either... tsk, tsk  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Paki gob on a stick
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103775
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #52 - Aug 16th, 2026 at 11:14am
 
Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2026 at 10:50am:
Setanta wrote on Aug 16th, 2026 at 2:13am:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 11:53pm:
Incorrect, silly Billy. I live and - ahem - work with the Muselman.


Of course you do, Inshallah, no?

Have you asked them about how they feel about the silly old poof they work and live with? I hope you live on the ground floor.



Yeah - and I would call trouser-sniffing and... er... 'ululating (ahem) 'work' exactly, either... tsk, tsk  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


But of course, dear boy. Back in the day, you called it pleasure.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 121322
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #53 - Aug 16th, 2026 at 12:11pm
 
Setanta wrote on Aug 16th, 2026 at 2:13am:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 15th, 2026 at 11:53pm:
Incorrect, silly Billy. I live and - ahem - work with the Muselman.


Of course you do, Inshallah, no?

Have you asked them about how they feel about the silly old poof they work and live with?
I hope you live on the ground floor.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 62124
Here
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #54 - Aug 16th, 2026 at 2:39pm
 
Quote:
Tucker Carlson for president?


People seem overly critical when it depends on context. Tuckems would make a fine president for many white nationalist clubs ?

He may work out ok as President of the surf club in many landlocked states.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8868
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #55 - Aug 16th, 2026 at 2:48pm
 
President of Australia?
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print