Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Tucker Carlson for president? (Read 347 times)
waggawoody
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3640
Wagga Wagga
Tucker Carlson for president?
Aug 7th, 2026 at 6:20pm
 
The Kim Iversen Show LIVE | August 6, 2026

Tucker Carlson just made his move. In a 90-minute address, he declares MAGA "betrayed," calls the two-party system "too disconnected to continue," and warns the alternative to a political solution is "kinetic" — then lays out a 10-point vision for a new party: equal rules for the "Epstein class," sovereignty from foreign lobbies he says pushed America into the Iran war "through bribery or threat or both," rebuilding real industry, opening the JFK and 9/11 files, ending funding for what he plainly calls genocide, and halting immigration until AI's impact is clear. He never says he's running — but positioning himself as the movement's leader, or its kingmaker, does the talking. Kim breaks down whether this is the birth of a real third party or a pressure campaign. Then: Flock cameras caught tracking a man across state lines for buying legal weed — exactly the mission creep critics warned about. Plus the WSJ documents rising spitting attacks on Christians in Israel — teens calling it a "religious duty" to humiliate "idol worshipers," a French nun beaten on Mount Zion, an IDF soldier jackhammering a Jesus statue in Lebanon — while Israel's foreign ministry attacks the Journal for reporting it, and AIPAC, fresh off its $32 million Michigan defeat, tells allies it may now bankroll the Republican in the general. And at Camp David: the Washington Post reports Trump erupted at Hegseth over being misled on the munitions crisis — a story the White House furiously denies while Trump vows the "treasonous" leakers will be "hunted down."

https://rumble.com/v7dtgle-is-tucker-carlson-running-for-president.htm
Back to top
 

Israel’s so-called peace process is in reality a process of apartheid and colonization.

Miko Peled
 
IP Logged
 
Paki gob on a stick
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103602
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #1 - Aug 7th, 2026 at 6:33pm
 
Oh well, JD can kiss his choice of VP away, I guess.

If Tucker keeps carrying on like this, there'll be no GOP left, just a hollowed out TRUMP/VANCE shell.

SO UNFAIR !!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59578
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #2 - Aug 7th, 2026 at 8:33pm
 
waggawoody wrote on Aug 7th, 2026 at 6:20pm:
The Kim Iversen Show LIVE | August 6, 2026

Tucker Carlson just made his move. In a 90-minute address, he declares MAGA "betrayed," calls the two-party system "too disconnected to continue," and warns the alternative to a political solution is "kinetic" — then lays out a 10-point vision for a new party: equal rules for the "Epstein class," sovereignty from foreign lobbies he says pushed America into the Iran war "through bribery or threat or both," rebuilding real industry, opening the JFK and 9/11 files, ending funding for what he plainly calls genocide, and halting immigration until AI's impact is clear. He never says he's running — but positioning himself as the movement's leader, or its kingmaker, does the talking. Kim breaks down whether this is the birth of a real third party or a pressure campaign. Then: Flock cameras caught tracking a man across state lines for buying legal weed — exactly the mission creep critics warned about. Plus the WSJ documents rising spitting attacks on Christians in Israel — teens calling it a "religious duty" to humiliate "idol worshipers," a French nun beaten on Mount Zion, an IDF soldier jackhammering a Jesus statue in Lebanon — while Israel's foreign ministry attacks the Journal for reporting it, and AIPAC, fresh off its $32 million Michigan defeat, tells allies it may now bankroll the Republican in the general. And at Camp David: the Washington Post reports Trump erupted at Hegseth over being misled on the munitions crisis — a story the White House furiously denies while Trump vows the "treasonous" leakers will be "hunted down."

https://rumble.com/v7dtgle-is-tucker-carlson-running-for-president.htm



Who's Kim Iverson?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59578
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #3 - Aug 7th, 2026 at 8:34pm
 
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 7th, 2026 at 6:33pm:
Oh well, JD can kiss his choice of VP away, I guess.

If Tucker keeps carrying on like this, there'll be no GOP left, just a hollowed out TRUMP/VANCE shell.

SO UNFAIR !!!


Who's Paki Gob on a Stick?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 154664
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #4 - Aug 7th, 2026 at 8:40pm
 

Who's Tucker Carlson?
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 121189
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #5 - Aug 7th, 2026 at 8:54pm
 

Yep - Tucker Carlson will be our next leader of the free world.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
waggawoody
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3640
Wagga Wagga
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #6 - Aug 7th, 2026 at 9:10pm
 
Come now, Greggy, you know very well who he is. And the best career move he ever made was to quit Fox News.

Around 10 years ago many scholars were saying that a third of Americans cannot deal with a $500 emergency. IOW,  they have to go into debt just to cope with it. I'd be surprised if things have improved since, if anything it's probably worse.

Yet how much has already been spent on this latest conflict with Iran? Over $60 billion, was the last I heard.

How much is given to Israel every year?

Why is the USA doing this when it could and should be using that money to improve the lives of its citizens?

Short answer: every US politician is corrupt, on the take from the Israel lobby.

Well, just about every one, with a few notable exceptions, like Thomas Massie and probably Rand Paul, and MTG, who resigned anyway.

These are the topics Tucker is talking about and they are resonating with his increasingly large audience on Rumble.com and elsewhere.

The big question is: will he be able to keep his head above water and not drown in the swamp - and still ward off the Zionists?

He needs to be careful - or he'll meet the same fate as Charlie Kirk.

BTW, more and more the official story of Charlie Kirk's murder is unravelling and guess who it all points to?

Israel.


Back to top
 

Israel’s so-called peace process is in reality a process of apartheid and colonization.

Miko Peled
 
IP Logged
 
Paki gob on a stick
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103602
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #7 - Aug 7th, 2026 at 9:40pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 7th, 2026 at 8:34pm:
Paki gob on a stick wrote on Aug 7th, 2026 at 6:33pm:
Oh well, JD can kiss his choice of VP away, I guess.

If Tucker keeps carrying on like this, there'll be no GOP left, just a hollowed out TRUMP/VANCE shell.

SO UNFAIR !!!


Who's Paki Gob on a Stick?



You asked us that only recently, dear chap, don't you remember? You asked us for a kiss.

We're not that kind of gal, we said.

I need to be fucked, you said.

Have you run it past a nurse? We asked.

Your response was incomprehensible, so we suggested you lodge a complaint with the Ombudsman, and left.

Who's Paki Gob on a Stick?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 121189
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #8 - Aug 7th, 2026 at 11:11pm
 

Karnal bypassed the word filter.

forgiven

namaste
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 62054
Here
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #9 - Aug 8th, 2026 at 9:54am
 
waggawoody wrote on Aug 7th, 2026 at 9:10pm:
the best career move he ever made was to quit Fox News.


Fox (News?) defended Tuckems in court by saying that he told lies that nobody believed. It didn't matter in the end the defamation cost Fox  $787.5 million paid to Dominion. After that surprise surprise surprise Fox fired Tuckems.


waggawoody wrote on Aug 7th, 2026 at 9:10pm:
These are the topics Tucker is talking about and they are resonating with his increasingly large audience on Rumble.com and elsewhere.


Tucks is now making a living by claiming to support the exact opposite to the things he spent about 15 years avidly supporting at Fox? 

Yes this is the man best know for being employed by Fox specifically to say things which are known to be not true. That was his career. Even Fox justified it by claiming that nobody believed what he was saying and done so under oath in court.



Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 8th, 2026 at 10:04am by Dnarever »  
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29369
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #10 - Aug 8th, 2026 at 10:05am
 
Here in Australia, we have the Australian Communications and Media Authority to oversee what we see and hear on TV, radio and in print and online media. They have broad powers to ensure what we see and hear is truthful and can punish media organisations who break the law. In the US, there is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), but they have very narrow, limited powers compared to ACMA, and it’s currently controlled by Trump sycophants who have no motivation to stop lies being told that benefit Trump. The big difference is that ACMA is entirely independent while the FCC has basically been taken over by Trump.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59578
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #11 - Aug 8th, 2026 at 12:03pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 8th, 2026 at 10:05am:
Here in Australia, we have the Australian Communications and Media Authority to oversee what we see and hear on TV, radio and in print and online media. They have broad powers to ensure what we see and hear is truthful and can punish media organisations who break the law. In the US, there is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), but they have very narrow, limited powers compared to ACMA, and it’s currently controlled by Trump sycophants who have no motivation to stop lies being told that benefit Trump. The big difference is that ACMA is entirely independent while the FCC has basically been taken over by Trump.

'Oversee' eh??



Australia’s eSafety Commissioner has threatened social media giant X with a $910,000 fine if it does not immediately remove an article by a US-based feminist that raised concerns about an Australian Medical Association Victoria staff member who has regularly generated and posted extreme transgender pornography in public online forums.

The action against feminist writer Genevieve Gluck is the latest in a series of cases Julie Inman-Grant has chosen to pursue against critics of transgender ideology, all of which the eSafety Commissioner has so far lost, at considerable expense to the taxpayer.

Ms Gluck wrote a Substack post in 2024 regarding AMA Victoria’s employment of a staff member, entitled “Trans-Identified Male Hired by Australian Medical Association Sharing Self-Made BDSM Porn on Social Media”.

The employee – whom The Australian has chosen not to name – remains in the role, which involves liaising with AHPRA and medical colleges.

The eSafety Commissioner on Tuesday wrote to Elon Musk-owned social media giant X, citing a complaint from the employee that claims Ms Gluck’s post contravenes the Online Safety Act, in that it constitutes “serious cyber-abuse meant to cause physical or psychological harm, surpassing mere offence”.

The post featured screenshots of graphic self-made pornography and lewd comments the employee had publicly posted on sites including OnlyFans, FetLife and X.

Ms Gluck used male pronouns to refer to the biological male, who identifies as a trans woman, and questioned the employee’s fitness for the AMA Victoria role.

The article also detailed the AMA’s controversial support for gender-affirming care, including the use of hormones to halt puberty in children.

“(The employee) was hired by the AMA,” Ms Gluck wrote.  “Yet disturbingly, (the employee) has been producing and posting extreme pornography of himself on social media for years, and has referenced the genre of ‘forced feminisation’ – a type of pornography that eroticises men being forced to wear lingerie, take female hormones, and perform sexual acts while pretending to be a woman.




The eSafety Commissioner is threatening NOT the pornographer but his critic, a woman, and X for giving the woman the space to voice her concerns.

I don't want this sort of 'overseeing'.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 154664
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #12 - Aug 8th, 2026 at 12:21pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Aug 7th, 2026 at 8:54pm:
Yep - Tucker Carlson will be our next leader of the free world. 


After Trump, anything is possible.

Who would have thought a rapist and convicted felon, with ties to Russian oligarchs, would end up in the White House?

Carrot Top could become the next POTUS and it wouldn't really surprise me.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29369
Gender: male
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #13 - Aug 8th, 2026 at 1:03pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 8th, 2026 at 12:21pm:
Bobby. wrote on Aug 7th, 2026 at 8:54pm:
Yep - Tucker Carlson will be our next leader of the free world. 


After Trump, anything is possible.

Who would have thought a rapist and convicted felon, with ties to Russian oligarchs, would end up in the White House?

Carrot Top could become the next POTUS and it wouldn't really surprise me.



Hey, if Trump can run for a third term, so can the best President since Nixon - Barrack Obama.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Paki gob on a stick
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103602
Re: Tucker Carlson for president?
Reply #14 - Aug 8th, 2026 at 3:03pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 8th, 2026 at 12:03pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 8th, 2026 at 10:05am:
Here in Australia, we have the Australian Communications and Media Authority to oversee what we see and hear on TV, radio and in print and online media. They have broad powers to ensure what we see and hear is truthful and can punish media organisations who break the law. In the US, there is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), but they have very narrow, limited powers compared to ACMA, and it’s currently controlled by Trump sycophants who have no motivation to stop lies being told that benefit Trump. The big difference is that ACMA is entirely independent while the FCC has basically been taken over by Trump.

'Oversee' eh??

Australia’s eSafety Commissioner has threatened social media giant X with a $910,000 fine if it does not immediately remove an article by a US-based feminist that raised concerns about an Australian Medical Association Victoria staff member who has regularly generated and posted extreme transgender pornography in public online forums.

The action against feminist writer Genevieve Gluck is the latest in a series of cases Julie Inman-Grant has chosen to pursue against critics of

The employee – whom The Australian has chosen not to name – remains in the role, which involves liaising with AHPRA and medical colleges.

The eSafety Commissioner on Tuesday wrote to Elon Musk-owned social media giant X, citing a complaint from the employee that claims Ms Gluck’s post contravenes the Online Safety Act, in that it constitutes “serious cyber-abuse meant to cause physical or psychological harm, surpassing mere offence”.

The post featured screenshots of graphic self-made pornography and lewd comments the employee had publicly posted on sites including OnlyFans, FetLife and X.

Ms Gluck used male pronouns to refer to the biological male, who identifies as a trans woman, and questioned the employee’s fitness for the AMA Victoria role.

The article also detailed the AMA’s controversial support for gender-affirming care, including the use of hormones to halt puberty in children.

“(The employee) was hired by the AMA,” Ms Gluck wrote.  “Yet disturbingly, (the employee) has been producing and posting extreme pornography of himself on social media for years, and has referenced the genre of ‘forced feminisation’ – a type of pornography that eroticises men being forced to wear lingerie, take female hormones, and perform sexual acts while pretending to be a woman.

The eSafety Commissioner is threatening NOT the pornographer but his critic, a woman, and X for giving the woman the space to voice her concerns.

I don't want this sort of 'overseeing'.


Yes, but you're a naughty old foreign alien, now aren't you?

We Aussies want X subject to the same child exploitation and kiddie porn laws as the rest of us.

This is, after all, what the debate you're weighing in on is all about - foreign corporate juggernauts flying in, setting up shop and flaunting our laws.

Your article's just a cute piece of PR from our friends over at the Australian. What some AMA employee does in the privacy of her online safe space is up to her, dear. This isn't about trannies, feminism or free speech at all, it's about ensuring social media giants put measures in place to stop our kiddies being targeted with ultimately suicidal content.

Elon in particular has expressed his outright contempt for government intervention. His pro-Gluck posts are the act of a troll with a lot at stake. There is overwhelming popular support for government regulation, and we Aussies are cautiously going ahead. The Brits and Europeans are watching closely - even your own DL. He knows what a vote-winner looks like, or does when the last person he spoke with points it out.

He also likes to play his subjects off against each other and get a piece of the action - Larry Ellison's control of Tic Toc; Elon's ownership of X.

Our own government has no such motives. Our politicians can't personally profit, their campaigns are mostly public funded, and we now have a National Anti Corruption Commission if they veer off course. This is what it's like to live in a full democracy - as opposed to the rigged, authoritarian kleptocracy you promote.

With the tech and social media sector more monopolized than the robber barons of the gilded age, we do indeed want this kind of overseeing. At the very least, Tic Toc, X, Meta and Google should be forced to disclose their algorithms - full transparency. I'd be breaking them up too, but alas, that's a job for Uncle.

Elon's monopoly alone has the ability to turn elections - exactly what happened in 2024.

As for you, we know hysterical, high-pitched virtue-signalling when we see it. This is your usual culture wars distraction. Trans athletes, stealing our pets, clutching your pearls. It's a game as old as - well, you.

Yes, you naughty old blow-in, you.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 8th, 2026 at 3:16pm by Paki gob on a stick »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print