Australian Politics Forum - Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154420
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #30 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:44pm

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:40pm:

There's more chance of you and FD answering a question than there is of the rapist donating to a charity.

So he never donated to charities? Then why the questiion? Shocked

Concentrate. I know you can do it.

Has Donald Trump ever helped himself to funds that were donated to charities by other people?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21258 Gender:	Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche Reply #31 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:47pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:44pm: Has Donald Trump ever helped himself to funds that were donated to charities by other people? Thank you for clarifying your question. it wasn't that hard was it? Yes and repaid it. next?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 154420 Gender:	Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche Reply #32 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:51pm lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:47pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:44pm: Has Donald Trump ever helped himself to funds that were donated to charities by other people? Thank you for clarifying your question. it wasn't that hard was it? Yes ... Ah. It wasn't that hard, was it?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21258 Gender:	Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche Reply #33 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:17pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:51pm: It wasn't that hard, was it? What wasn't dummy. I already said corruption goes both ways.
Back to top	IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103358

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #34 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:38pm

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:32pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:39pm:

Are you now raising the corruption bar to include acts only with criminal or civil rulings?

Nope.

Great. So we can finally receive your answer.

Quote:

No, Donald Trump has not directly taken government funds for himself, but his administration’s attempt to settle a lawsuit using taxpayer money was blocked by courts and dropped following intense bipartisan backlash.

Why did you omit this one, Lee? The deal was so corrupt, the judge referred DL's lawyers to their respective bar associations for immediate disbarment.

Your DL has indeed taken direct government funds for himself. $1.6 bil in government funds were paid out directly to fund his own Kazakstani mining venture.

$230 mil from the DOJ for his pain and suffering - something even DL says looks bad.

No need for court rulings here, dear. DL declared it.

Can you show Sleepy Joe doing any such thing?

We'll broaden it out to make it easy for you - can you show any other prez?

Cheers.

Back to top

IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103358

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #35 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:46pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:51pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:44pm:

Has Donald Trump ever helped himself to funds that were donated to charities by other people?

Thank you for clarifying your question. it wasn't that hard was it?

Yes ...

Ah.

It wasn't that hard, was it?

Hang on, did Lee just say he supports a DL who's been found liable for charity fraud?

I'm confused. He keeps adding all these addendums and footnotes.

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21258
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #36 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:49pm

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:38pm:

but his administration’s attempt to settle a lawsuit using taxpayer money was blocked by courts and dropped following intense bipartisan backlash.

So his administration not Trump himself. You really are clutching at straws as well as your pearls.Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:38pm:

Your DL has indeed taken direct government funds for himself. $1.6 bil in government funds were paid out directly to fund his own Kazakstani mining venture.

You haven't shown that either. Grin

According to duck.ai - "No clear evidence shows that Donald Trump himself “took” or personally received direct U.S. government funds for his own Kazakh mining venture."

Try again. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21258 Gender:	Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche Reply #37 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:50pm Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:46pm: I'm confused. poor petal. the perpetually confused.
Back to top	IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103358

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #38 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:53pm

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:50pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:46pm:

I'm confused.

poor petal. the perpetually confused. Grin

Great. Feel free to enlighten us with an answer. Can you show Sleepy Joe doing any such thing?

We'll broaden it out to make it easy for you - can you show any other prez?

Cheers.

Back to top

IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103358

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #39 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:01pm

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:49pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:38pm:

but his administration’s attempt to settle a lawsuit using taxpayer money was blocked by courts and dropped following intense bipartisan backlash.

So his administration not Trump himself.

Try again. Grin

Oh, I see. So you think his personal attorney Todd Blanche did this on his own, do you?

So why did you DL push for it? He originally wanted the money to be paid to himself. He switched it to a LAWFARE victim's fund when the judge knocked it back.

We'd like just one question answered here, please. Don't you think asking for that is corrupt?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154420
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #40 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:22pm

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:53pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:50pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:46pm:

I'm confused.

poor petal. the perpetually confused. Grin

Great. Feel free to enlighten us with an answer. Can you show Sleepy Joe doing any such thing?

We'll broaden it out to make it easy for you - can you show any other prez?

Cheers.

lee?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103358

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #41 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:28pm

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:49pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:38pm:

but his administration’s attempt to settle a lawsuit using taxpayer money was blocked by courts and dropped following intense bipartisan backlash.

So his administration not Trump himself. You really are clutching at straws as well as your pearls.Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:38pm:

Your DL has indeed taken direct government funds for himself. $1.6 bil in government funds were paid out directly to fund his own Kazakstani mining venture.

You haven't shown that either. Grin

According to duck.ai - "No clear evidence shows that Donald Trump himself “took” or personally received direct U.S. government funds for his own Kazakh mining venture."

Try again. Grin

Looks like Lee's gone, Greggery. Hard day at the office, eh?

He's countered evidence from the New York Times, supported by government funding submissions, licensing agreements with the government of Kazakhstan and confessions from his own two sons, with a heavily redacted AI quote, which reads:

Quote:

"There isn’t evidence (in the reporting I found) that Trump personally “took” government money for himself in the way you might mean it—but there was a proposed DOJ-created settlement structure using taxpayer money that critics said could benefit Trump’s allies."

They're all as bad as each other, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21258 Gender:	Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche Reply #42 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:29pm Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:53pm: Can you show Sleepy Joe doing any such thing? Oh you mean Sleepy Joe is more slippery than that? I agree.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154420
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #43 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:31pm

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:28pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:49pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:38pm:

but his administration’s attempt to settle a lawsuit using taxpayer money was blocked by courts and dropped following intense bipartisan backlash.

So his administration not Trump himself. You really are clutching at straws as well as your pearls.Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 4:38pm:

Your DL has indeed taken direct government funds for himself. $1.6 bil in government funds were paid out directly to fund his own Kazakstani mining venture.

You haven't shown that either. Grin

According to duck.ai - "No clear evidence shows that Donald Trump himself “took” or personally received direct U.S. government funds for his own Kazakh mining venture."

Try again. Grin

Looks like Lee's gone, Greggery. Hard day at the office, eh?

Looks that way.

Or, as Bobby likes to say, a hard day at the orifice.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21258
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #44 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:32pm

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 5:28pm:

He's countered evidence from the New York Times, supported by government funding submissions, licensing agreements with the government of Kazakhstan and confessions from his own two sons, with a heavily redacted AI quote, which reads:

Quote:
"There isn’t evidence (in the reporting I found) that Trump personally “took” government money for himself in the way you might mean it—but there was a proposed DOJ-created settlement structure using taxpayer money that critics said could benefit Trump’s allies."

Oh only "critics said could". That seems ominous. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged