Australian Politics Forum - Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21276 Gender:	Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche Reply #15 - Jul 21^st, 2026 at 2:36pm Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 1:13pm: You may have misread the question, Nope. I was responding to its intent.
Back to top	IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103400

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #16 - Jul 21^st, 2026 at 5:13pm

lee wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 2:36pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 1:13pm:

You may have misread the question,

Nope. I was responding to its intent. Grin

Right, so you deliberately answered the wrong question.

Cunning, no?

You just said this kind of corruption is wrong. Can you tell us why that is?

Cheers.

Back to top

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21276 Gender:	Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche Reply #17 - Jul 21^st, 2026 at 6:18pm Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 5:13pm: You just said this kind of corruption is wrong. Can you tell us why that is? \ Bloody hell you are thick. All corruption is wrong. Don't limit yourself to Republicans.
Back to top	IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103400

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #18 - Jul 21^st, 2026 at 6:26pm

lee wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 6:18pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 5:13pm:

You just said this kind of corruption is wrong. Can you tell us why that is?

\
Bloody hell you are thick. All corruption is wrong. Don't limit yourself to Republicans. Roll Eyes

Right, so what do you have to say to your DL about that?

You got shirty about Sleepy Joe filing a lawsuit to prevent the current DOJ from releasing transcripts of his private conversations with a biographer.

But you're okay with your DL helping himself to $1.8 bil in government funds and demanding tax exemptions for life?

You'll need to explain yourself, Lee.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jul 21^st, 2026 at 6:31pm by Paki gob on a stick »

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21276
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #19 - Jul 21^st, 2026 at 8:38pm

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 6:26pm:

You'll need to explain yourself, Lee.

You are still as thick as a brick. There is no such thing as "noble cause corruption" it is simply corruption. Now what was it I said about corruption - remind me. Roll Eyes

BTW - AI says -"There’s no clear finding that Donald Trump “helped himself” to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal use."

So that is false. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103400

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #20 - Jul 21^st, 2026 at 9:32pm

lee wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 8:38pm:

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 6:26pm:

You'll need to explain yourself, Lee.

You are still as thick as a brick. There is no such thing as "noble cause corruption" it is simply corruption. Now what was it I said about corruption - remind me. Roll Eyes

BTW - AI says -"There’s no clear finding that Donald Trump “helped himself” to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal use."

So that is false. Wink

Can you post that for us, Lee?

With the source, please.

Cheers.

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21276
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #21 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 1:41pm

Search duck.ai for "There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal use."

You get yourself so tied up in your lies you have to doubt everyone else. Roll Eyes

BTW- Do you know how Presidents separate their own holdings whilst holding office? Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21276
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #22 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:32pm

OR try Google Ai -

"There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal useThat is correct. No court or official investigation has ever found Donald Trump criminally liable for stealing or directly misappropriating taxpayer money for personal use."

https://www.google.com/search?q=There%27s+no+clear+finding+that+Donald+Trump+%22...

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154448
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #23 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:35pm

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:32pm:

OR try Google Ai -

"There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal useThat is correct. No court or official investigation has ever found Donald Trump criminally liable for stealing or directly misappropriating taxpayer money for personal use."

What about money donated to charities?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103400

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #24 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:39pm

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 1:41pm:

Search duck.ai for "There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal use."

You get yourself so tied up in your lies you have to doubt everyone else. Roll Eyes

BTW- Do you know how Presidents separate their own holdings whilst holding office? Roll Eyes

Criminality and civil liability are two different legal criteria, Lee. Duck AI said no such thing, but I'm curious.

Are you now raising the corruption bar to include acts only with criminal or civil rulings?

All good. Cite your criminal/civil rulings against Sleepy Joe, please.

Cheers.

Back to top

IP Logged

Paki gob on a stick

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 103400

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #25 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:57pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:35pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:32pm:

OR try Google Ai -

"There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal useThat is correct. No court or official investigation has ever found Donald Trump criminally liable for stealing or directly misappropriating taxpayer money for personal use."

What about money donated to charities?

Strange. DL was ruled civilly liable.

Trump university - civilly liable.

E Jean defamation - civilly liable. Sexual assault - civilly liable.

Theft of government records - criminally indicted. Conspiracy to overturn an election - criminally indicted. Georgia election interference - criminally arrested.

34 counts of fraudulently falsifying business records, raised to felony status due to proven election interference - criminally convicted.

We've omitted all the other civil counts where he settled. These are just the indictments, arrests, civil rulings and criminal convictions.

So, we'll await Lee's AI response on Sleepy Joe, shall we?

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21276
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #26 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:32pm

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:39pm:

Criminality and civil liability are two different legal criteria, Lee. Duck AI said no such thing, but I'm curious.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 21^st, 2026 at 6:26pm:

But you're okay with your DL helping himself to $1.8 bil in government funds and demanding tax exemptions for life?

Your words.

Duck AI - "There isn’t evidence (in the reporting I found) that Trump personally “took” government money for himself in the way you might mean it—but there was a proposed DOJ-created settlement structure using taxpayer money that critics said could benefit Trump’s allies."

Google AI - "No, Donald Trump has not been legally found to have stolen or directly embezzled government funds."

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-lm&q=did+trmp+help+himself+to+gov...

Once I got it to answer the querstion.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:39pm:

Are you now raising the corruption bar to include acts only with criminal or civil rulings?

Nope. Help himself has its own connotattions of legality., Roll Eyes

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:40pm by lee »

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21276
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #27 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:36pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:35pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:32pm:

OR try Google Ai -

"There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal useThat is correct. No court or official investigation has ever found Donald Trump criminally liable for stealing or directly misappropriating taxpayer money for personal use."

What about money donated to charities?

Did he donate money to charities?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154448
Gender: male

Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche
Reply #28 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:40pm

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:35pm:

lee wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 2:32pm:

OR try Google Ai -

"There's no clear finding that Donald Trump "helped himself" to government funds in the sense of being ruled criminally liable for stealing taxpayer money for personal useThat is correct. No court or official investigation has ever found Donald Trump criminally liable for stealing or directly misappropriating taxpayer money for personal use."

What about money donated to charities?

Did he donate money to charities?

There's more chance of you and FD answering a question than there is of the rapist donating to a charity.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21276 Gender:	Re: Liz Oyer torches Todd Blanche Reply #29 - Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:42pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22^nd, 2026 at 3:40pm: There's more chance of you and FD answering a question than there is of the rapist donating to a charity. So he never donated to charities? Then why the questiion?
Back to top	IP Logged