It certainly has a high concentration of sex offenders.

I can't think of many people in the Trump regime who haven't been charged with or accused of sexual assault.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 6^th, 2026 at 1:43pm:


It certainly seems like being a sexual predator is a prerequisite for working with Trump.

Donald Trump: Over 25 women have accused him of sexual misconduct, ranging from unwanted touching to rape. In 2023, a federal civil jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll.

Pete Hegseth: Trump’s initial nominee for Secretary of Defense was investigated by police in 2017 for an alleged sexual assault in California; he was not arrested or charged. He paid the accuser an undisclosed amount and signed a non-disclosure agreement, maintaining that the encounter was consensual.

Matt Gaetz: Trump’s initial nominee for Attorney General faced a House Ethics Committee investigation over allegations of sexual misconduct and illicit drug use. He withdrew from consideration.

Rudy Giuliani: Trump’s former personal attorney faces multiple sexual assault lawsuits, including allegations of sexual assault, harassment, and workplace coercion.

Walt Nauta: Trump’s personal valet and former military aide faced allegations in a Navy investigation of having inappropriate relationships and sending harassing messages to servicewomen.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 6^th, 2026 at 7:51pm:


Greggery, that's unfair. You can't just make unfounded allegations like this. Can you point to one person in the White House who's been proven in court to have sexually abused someone?

Just one.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7^th, 2026 at 3:45pm:


DL?

That's unfair, Greggery. Panther, our board's constitutional expert, said he'd never support a prez found liable for something like sexual abuse and defamation, it would be a bridge too far. He'd need to hear a verdict from a jury at the very least.

Rule of law, innit.

Oh look, we told Panther, the jury's back. Turns out he did it.

Now now, Panther said, he has every right to appeal. That's his right in a free country with a proud rule of law, no? Until we hear the verdict from the appeal, all bets are off.

So he appealed. Judge Kaplan found him liable - again. Moreso, Judge Kaplan said, he'd never seen a defendant so hostile in all his years. Pay up, he told DL, you're done.

So we told Panther.

Now now, Panther said, he can still take it to SCOTUS, as is his right in a free country with a rule of law. That's what we call justice. Rule of law, etc, etc, etc.

Look, we said, if he takes it to SCOTUS and nothing happens, you'll have to say it - as is the victim's right in a free country with a proud rule of law.

Panther?

And with that, he was gone - poof!

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 7^th, 2026 at 4:28pm:


That's unfair, Armchair. Have they received an indictment by a court/courts to stand trial for such insidious allegations?

That's the legal standard of our board's constitutional expert and proud American, Panther.

Actually, he might have upped the standard at the time of reporting.

He's a devout constitutional conservative, you see.

lee wrote on Jul 7^th, 2026 at 6:26pm:


He's got you there, leftards. The address on the SO register has to have an actual offender.

Lee's right. We'll need a name.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7^th, 2026 at 7:17pm:


Oh look - he's gone.

Poof! Off like a carton of milk left near Melania.