Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
TRANS MICE Act (Read 595 times)
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 17377
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: TRANS MICE Act
Reply #15 - Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:45pm
 
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:30pm:
Leroy wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:24pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:57pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 1:54pm:
The bill is consistent with President Donald Trump’s past false claim that taxpayers were funding medical research to make “mice transgender.”

That was hilarious   Grin

It was 'transgenic mice', not transgender.

https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/transgenic-mic...

Professor Kelley: "Donald Trump was the *dumbest goddam student I ever had".





Oh, Greggery. So Elon thought transgenic meant tranny, did he?



Indeed.

Moreover, he claimed that some of the dead "transgender" mice were still receiving social security benefits.



I know, right? CNN posted an article on it.

Quote:
DOGE and transgender mice: Trump claimed on Tuesday that the Department of Government Efficiency identified government spending of “$8 million for making mice transgender.” This claim needs context.

The morning after Trump’s speech, the White House provided a list of $8.3 million in federal grants to health studies that involve mice receiving treatments that can be used in gender-affirming health care. The White House list made clear what Trump, in the speech, did not: The studies were meant to figure out how these treatments might affect the health of humans who take them, not for the purpose of making mice transgender.

For example, the National Cancer Institute awarded $299,940 to one project in 2023 to compare breast cancer rates among female mice and those receiving testosterone therapy. Hormone regulation of breast development is similar in mice and humans, and the research allows for much faster findings than a prospective study in humans.


Here's a link:

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/04/politics/fact-check-trump-address-congress/in...

So that's $8 mil saved on turning mice trans, but I'm curious.

How much did he charge taxpayers to re-paint his swamp?


Considerably less than Obama.

Quote:
A $34 million rehabilitation project completed during the Obama administration
between 2010 and 2012 added pilings and upgraded filtration systems, but did not eliminate the leaks. Officials said millions of gallons of water continued to be lost each year.





Have you got a link to that?


Why not search it? I'm sure you can manage that. Then you can choose a news source you trust?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dirty Paki Khunt
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103128
Re: TRANS MICE Act
Reply #16 - Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:02pm
 
Setanta wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:45pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:30pm:
Leroy wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:24pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:57pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 1:54pm:
The bill is consistent with President Donald Trump’s past false claim that taxpayers were funding medical research to make “mice transgender.”

That was hilarious   Grin

It was 'transgenic mice', not transgender.

https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/transgenic-mic...

Professor Kelley: "Donald Trump was the *dumbest goddam student I ever had".





Oh, Greggery. So Elon thought transgenic meant tranny, did he?



Indeed.

Moreover, he claimed that some of the dead "transgender" mice were still receiving social security benefits.



I know, right? CNN posted an article on it.

Quote:
DOGE and transgender mice: Trump claimed on Tuesday that the Department of Government Efficiency identified government spending of “$8 million for making mice transgender.” This claim needs context.

The morning after Trump’s speech, the White House provided a list of $8.3 million in federal grants to health studies that involve mice receiving treatments that can be used in gender-affirming health care. The White House list made clear what Trump, in the speech, did not: The studies were meant to figure out how these treatments might affect the health of humans who take them, not for the purpose of making mice transgender.

For example, the National Cancer Institute awarded $299,940 to one project in 2023 to compare breast cancer rates among female mice and those receiving testosterone therapy. Hormone regulation of breast development is similar in mice and humans, and the research allows for much faster findings than a prospective study in humans.


Here's a link:

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/04/politics/fact-check-trump-address-congress/in...

So that's $8 mil saved on turning mice trans, but I'm curious.

How much did he charge taxpayers to re-paint his swamp?


Considerably less than Obama.

Quote:
A $34 million rehabilitation project completed during the Obama administration
between 2010 and 2012 added pilings and upgraded filtration systems, but did not eliminate the leaks. Officials said millions of gallons of water continued to be lost each year.





Have you got a link to that?


Why not search it? I'm sure you can manage that. Then you can choose a news source you trust?


Oh, I did. Why do you think Leroy's hiding it?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 17377
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: TRANS MICE Act
Reply #17 - Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:09pm
 
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:02pm:
Setanta wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:45pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:30pm:
Leroy wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:24pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:57pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 1:54pm:
The bill is consistent with President Donald Trump’s past false claim that taxpayers were funding medical research to make “mice transgender.”

That was hilarious   Grin

It was 'transgenic mice', not transgender.

https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/transgenic-mic...

Professor Kelley: "Donald Trump was the *dumbest goddam student I ever had".





Oh, Greggery. So Elon thought transgenic meant tranny, did he?



Indeed.

Moreover, he claimed that some of the dead "transgender" mice were still receiving social security benefits.


I know, right? CNN posted an article on it.

Quote:
DOGE and transgender mice: Trump claimed on Tuesday that the Department of Government Efficiency identified government spending of “$8 million for making mice transgender.” This claim needs context.

The morning after Trump’s speech, the White House provided a list of $8.3 million in federal grants to health studies that involve mice receiving treatments that can be used in gender-affirming health care. The White House list made clear what Trump, in the speech, did not: The studies were meant to figure out how these treatments might affect the health of humans who take them, not for the purpose of making mice transgender.

For example, the National Cancer Institute awarded $299,940 to one project in 2023 to compare breast cancer rates among female mice and those receiving testosterone therapy. Hormone regulation of breast development is similar in mice and humans, and the research allows for much faster findings than a prospective study in humans.


Here's a link:

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/04/politics/fact-check-trump-address-congress/in...

So that's $8 mil saved on turning mice trans, but I'm curious.

How much did he charge taxpayers to re-paint his swamp?


Considerably less than Obama.

Quote:
A $34 million rehabilitation project completed during the Obama administration
between 2010 and 2012 added pilings and upgraded filtration systems, but did not eliminate the leaks. Officials said millions of gallons of water continued to be lost each year.





Have you got a link to that?


Why not search it? I'm sure you can manage that. Then you can choose a news source you trust?


Oh, I did. Why do you think Leroy's hiding it?


What is he hiding?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dirty Paki Khunt
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103128
Re: TRANS MICE Act
Reply #18 - Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:32pm
 
Setanta wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:09pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:02pm:
Setanta wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:45pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:30pm:
Leroy wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:24pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:57pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 1:54pm:
The bill is consistent with President Donald Trump’s past false claim that taxpayers were funding medical research to make “mice transgender.”

That was hilarious   Grin

It was 'transgenic mice', not transgender.

https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/transgenic-mic...

Professor Kelley: "Donald Trump was the *dumbest goddam student I ever had".





Oh, Greggery. So Elon thought transgenic meant tranny, did he?



Indeed.

Moreover, he claimed that some of the dead "transgender" mice were still receiving social security benefits.


I know, right? CNN posted an article on it.

Quote:
DOGE and transgender mice: Trump claimed on Tuesday that the Department of Government Efficiency identified government spending of “$8 million for making mice transgender.” This claim needs context.

The morning after Trump’s speech, the White House provided a list of $8.3 million in federal grants to health studies that involve mice receiving treatments that can be used in gender-affirming health care. The White House list made clear what Trump, in the speech, did not: The studies were meant to figure out how these treatments might affect the health of humans who take them, not for the purpose of making mice transgender.

For example, the National Cancer Institute awarded $299,940 to one project in 2023 to compare breast cancer rates among female mice and those receiving testosterone therapy. Hormone regulation of breast development is similar in mice and humans, and the research allows for much faster findings than a prospective study in humans.


Here's a link:

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/04/politics/fact-check-trump-address-congress/in...

So that's $8 mil saved on turning mice trans, but I'm curious.

How much did he charge taxpayers to re-paint his swamp?


Considerably less than Obama.

Quote:
A $34 million rehabilitation project completed during the Obama administration
between 2010 and 2012 added pilings and upgraded filtration systems, but did not eliminate the leaks. Officials said millions of gallons of water continued to be lost each year.





Have you got a link to that?


Why not search it? I'm sure you can manage that. Then you can choose a news source you trust?


Oh, I did. Why do you think Leroy's hiding it?


What is he hiding?


His source. Have you seen it?

I think not. Why are you pretending too?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 17377
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: TRANS MICE Act
Reply #19 - Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:39pm
 
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:32pm:
Setanta wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:09pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:02pm:
Setanta wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:45pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:30pm:
Leroy wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:24pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:57pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 1:54pm:
The bill is consistent with President Donald Trump’s past false claim that taxpayers were funding medical research to make “mice transgender.”

That was hilarious   Grin

It was 'transgenic mice', not transgender.

https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/transgenic-mic...

Professor Kelley: "Donald Trump was the *dumbest goddam student I ever had".





Oh, Greggery. So Elon thought transgenic meant tranny, did he?



Indeed.

Moreover, he claimed that some of the dead "transgender" mice were still receiving social security benefits.


I know, right? CNN posted an article on it.

Quote:
DOGE and transgender mice: Trump claimed on Tuesday that the Department of Government Efficiency identified government spending of “$8 million for making mice transgender.” This claim needs context.

The morning after Trump’s speech, the White House provided a list of $8.3 million in federal grants to health studies that involve mice receiving treatments that can be used in gender-affirming health care. The White House list made clear what Trump, in the speech, did not: The studies were meant to figure out how these treatments might affect the health of humans who take them, not for the purpose of making mice transgender.

For example, the National Cancer Institute awarded $299,940 to one project in 2023 to compare breast cancer rates among female mice and those receiving testosterone therapy. Hormone regulation of breast development is similar in mice and humans, and the research allows for much faster findings than a prospective study in humans.


Here's a link:

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/04/politics/fact-check-trump-address-congress/in...

So that's $8 mil saved on turning mice trans, but I'm curious.

How much did he charge taxpayers to re-paint his swamp?


Considerably less than Obama.

Quote:
A $34 million rehabilitation project completed during the Obama administration
between 2010 and 2012 added pilings and upgraded filtration systems, but did not eliminate the leaks. Officials said millions of gallons of water continued to be lost each year.





Have you got a link to that?


Why not search it? I'm sure you can manage that. Then you can choose a news source you trust?


Oh, I did. Why do you think Leroy's hiding it?


What is he hiding?


His source. Have you seen it?

I think not. Why are you pretending too?


I'm not pretending anything. He put it in a quote so I searched for the quote. Why do you feel the need to be force fed?

Ever felt the marbling of the feedlot creeping in?

Edit:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:32pm:
I think not. Why are you pretending too?


I'm wondering if I am also pretending, even though no pretending has been talked about or am I pretending "to" think, in which case I might have to set Peccar onto you. Huh
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 26th, 2026 at 9:41pm by Setanta »  
 
IP Logged
 
Dirty Paki Khunt
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103128
Re: TRANS MICE Act
Reply #20 - Jun 26th, 2026 at 10:57pm
 
Setanta wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:39pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:32pm:
Setanta wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:09pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:02pm:
Setanta wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:45pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:30pm:
Leroy wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:24pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 7:15pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:57pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 6:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 1:54pm:
The bill is consistent with President Donald Trump’s past false claim that taxpayers were funding medical research to make “mice transgender.”

That was hilarious   Grin

It was 'transgenic mice', not transgender.

https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/transgenic-mic...

Professor Kelley: "Donald Trump was the *dumbest goddam student I ever had".





Oh, Greggery. So Elon thought transgenic meant tranny, did he?



Indeed.

Moreover, he claimed that some of the dead "transgender" mice were still receiving social security benefits.


I know, right? CNN posted an article on it.

Quote:
DOGE and transgender mice: Trump claimed on Tuesday that the Department of Government Efficiency identified government spending of “$8 million for making mice transgender.” This claim needs context.

The morning after Trump’s speech, the White House provided a list of $8.3 million in federal grants to health studies that involve mice receiving treatments that can be used in gender-affirming health care. The White House list made clear what Trump, in the speech, did not: The studies were meant to figure out how these treatments might affect the health of humans who take them, not for the purpose of making mice transgender.

For example, the National Cancer Institute awarded $299,940 to one project in 2023 to compare breast cancer rates among female mice and those receiving testosterone therapy. Hormone regulation of breast development is similar in mice and humans, and the research allows for much faster findings than a prospective study in humans.


Here's a link:

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/04/politics/fact-check-trump-address-congress/in...

So that's $8 mil saved on turning mice trans, but I'm curious.

How much did he charge taxpayers to re-paint his swamp?


Considerably less than Obama.

Quote:
A $34 million rehabilitation project completed during the Obama administration
between 2010 and 2012 added pilings and upgraded filtration systems, but did not eliminate the leaks. Officials said millions of gallons of water continued to be lost each year.





Have you got a link to that?


Why not search it? I'm sure you can manage that. Then you can choose a news source you trust?


Oh, I did. Why do you think Leroy's hiding it?


What is he hiding?


His source. Have you seen it?

I think not. Why are you pretending too?


I'm not pretending anything. He put it in a quote so I searched for the quote. Why do you feel the need to be force fed?

Ever felt the marbling of the feedlot creeping in?

Edit:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 26th, 2026 at 8:32pm:
I think not. Why are you pretending too?


I'm wondering if I am also pretending, even though no pretending has been talked about or am I pretending "to" think, in which case I might have to set Peccar onto you. Huh


Do you know who Leroy is?

That's a question.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59082
Gender: male
Re: TRANS MICE Act
Reply #21 - Yesterday at 8:32pm
 
Alleged Charlie Kirk killer’s trans lover reveals moment he tearfully confessed to the shooting


Charlie Kirk’s accused killer Tyler Robinson confessed three times to murdering the conservative leading light, according to a bombshell video from Robinson’s trans lover — including after he sneaked back to their Utah love nest.

Lance Twiggs, who was seen speaking publicly for the first time Thursday in a pre-recorded deposition, told investigators he awoke the day after the Sept. 10 assassination to Robinson walking around their apartment, before he broke down and declared he “wishes he hadn’t done it” and that he was about to turn himself in.

Robinson’s confessions, in a letter to Twiggs, text messages and in person — all shown in court during a preliminary hearing — offered the strongest picture yet of how the accused lone gunman described carrying out the murder at Utah Valley University and even made crude jokes about it.

https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cx2kz07k988o


Gender Identity: Law enforcement and court records identify Twiggs as a male transitioning to a female. In a video interview played during the preliminary hearing, Twiggs confirmed he has also used the name Luna.




Deranged, dangerous lunatics.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 153910
Gender: male
Re: TRANS MICE Act
Reply #22 - Yesterday at 8:44pm
 
Frank wrote Yesterday at 8:32pm:
Alleged Charlie Kirk killer’s trans lover reveals moment he tearfully confessed to the shooting


Charlie Kirk’s accused killer Tyler Robinson confessed three times to murdering the conservative leading light, according to a bombshell video from Robinson’s trans lover — including after he sneaked back to their Utah love nest.

Lance Twiggs, who was seen speaking publicly for the first time Thursday in a pre-recorded deposition, told investigators he awoke the day after the Sept. 10 assassination to Robinson walking around their apartment, before he broke down and declared he “wishes he hadn’t done it” and that he was about to turn himself in.

Robinson’s confessions, in a letter to Twiggs, text messages and in person — all shown in court during a preliminary hearing — offered the strongest picture yet of how the accused lone gunman described carrying out the murder at Utah Valley University and even made crude jokes about it.

https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cx2kz07k988o


Gender Identity: Law enforcement and court records identify Twiggs as a male transitioning to a female. In a video interview played during the preliminary hearing, Twiggs confirmed he has also used the name Luna.




Deranged, dangerous lunatics.


Kirk's dead?   Undecided

Thoughts & prayers.

How is the grieving widow coping?
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Racist Filth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 90414
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: TRANS MICE Act
Reply #23 - Yesterday at 10:09pm
 
The modern approach to capturing the minds of an entire populace is to inculcate in them not only what to believe ... but HOW to believe...

When a young mind sees a representation online of some CONCEPT of 'reality' - rather than differentiating between reality and the presented concept - that modern day young mind - indoctrinated at schools and via internet etc interaction and peers -  considers that the concept put forward IS the reality... i.e. - that mind has been told HOW to believe ... things claimed to be 'feelings' about an issue become the reality.

I feel without thinking therefore it must be ....

I came across this musing in my mind during discussion of how, when, where and why ANYONE would gleefully advocate the murder of 15,000 horses out of a claimed population - disputed by those who KNOW horses - of 18,000 - a figure impossible for horses to achieve from the original starting point.. and the concept was pushed that the horse population (of the Snowies) had 'exploded' - something any horse person will tell you is impossible...

On top of that I've posted videos of horses fleeing across grassland and - wait for it - streams.... and there is NO damage to the grasslands or the stream banks .. NONE .. and the photos provided as 'proof' that Brumbies wreck stream banks were PIG WALLOWS ...

Yet the Dorks accepted that population explosion and 'destruction of the environment' as reality.... and tolerated and tolerate this vile massacre of Nature's beings ... and laugh at those who put their earnest feelings about this heartless murder forward .. while governments and their 'ministers' just persist with the murders... a local landholder showed video of a shot horse - 'humane' they said - it had been gut shot, shot in the back and left to die... apparently involuntary separation of life and body is 'humane' now ...

Look to your own mind ... tell me where your personal hates are.... and then consider if they are real or not.... we live in a land of illusion operated by liars.... be careful what you choose....
Back to top
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:16pm by Grappler Racist Filth »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print