"Throws boy to crocs...GETS BAIL"
I blame the Labor Party.
.......and the NLP, and the Liberal Party, and the Greens.
I blame every one of our
LAWMAKERS.
I blame all of them,
individually,
for neglecting their responsibility to protect law abiding Australians from those miscreants [who
'live in the community'] who frequently demonstrate a want, to [randomly or to not so randomly] harm or murder other persons around them.
OUR LAWMAKERS.In 'process'......they are a group of employees [who are the servants of the citizens of Australia],
who are charged [
IN LAW......and each one of them, has taken an oath] to responsibly exercise and manage the affairs of the citizens of Australia......
IN LAW.
But instead.....they [
OUR LAWMAKERS] choose.....to allow a 'community of persons', to come into OUR Australian community,
persons [miscreants] who believe that.....
it doesn't matter in what way others may be harmed by their [the miscreants] actions.....
they [the miscreants] must always have a lawful right to harm and/or murder others.
AND......IT IS CLEAR, THAT OUR LAWMAKERS,
ARE IN AGREEMENT, WITH THE MISCREANTS.And that circumstance 'stands' [IN LAW] even when such miscreants have previously demonstrated their want and intent, is to physically harm others around them.
OUR LAWMAKERS = = are the lunatics who are in charge of our asylum [i.e. Australia].
miscreant = = a person who behaves badly or unlawfully..
It isn't difficult.
It wouldn't be difficult to remedy.
Clear moral guidance.....Why can't a nation like Australia achieve it [i.e. choose it] ?
Deuteronomy 25:1
If there be a controversy between men,
and they come unto judgment, that the judges may judge them;
then they shall justify the righteous,
and condemn the wicked..
Yadda said somewhere on OzPol.... Quote: Quote:
I come back to my argument about the wisdom, of assuming, in this PC world,
that it is ok for 'sheep' and 'wolves' to share the same 'meadow'.
The opinion of many, is that it is OK.
I disagree.
I say that 'sheep' and 'wolves' need to be separated.
Consequences [regarding criminal behaviour]......should be about
the things which people do.
It should not be about a skin colour, nor about [excusing the behaviour of members of a 'protected'] culture or societal group.
Criminal sanctions, imposed by the state,
should be based upon the criminal behaviour, of individuals.
Not so ?
Why can't it be achieved ?
It must be clear by now, that those with their hands on the 'levers' of power.....do not want it to be so.
[i.e.
that it ought to be so........
that those persons who have a want, to commit violent criminal acts,
ought to be removed from our society.]