Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print
Pauline, Please Explain ! (Read 6097 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 153784
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #135 - Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:35pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:32pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:04pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 3:22pm:
The question I would ask Pauline is where will she get our workforce from if she stops immigration?


Her reply would be: "Please explain".

She's a clueless, racist POS.




https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/ef/9f/84/ef9f8451cb6ebd220df99ee0c625ee0a.j...


Hanson is a racist POS.

If I ever see her grave, I will definitely piss on it.

(That'll probably give Frank a hard-on)
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15428
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #136 - Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm
 
lee wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 1:00pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 2nd, 2026 at 3:44pm:
Economists estimate that lifting hundreds of thousands of Australians out of poverty would cost roughly $12 billion per year.


Oh is that all. For how long would this $12 billion a year have to be paid? Forever?


Until everyone can support themselves  - like you and me,  who have been employed for most of our working lives.

Quote:
so it wasn't freeeee? Grin Grin Grin Grin
 

Free for the recipients of the rescue package, but not for the government; how many times do I have to tell you the rescue package should also have been free for the currency-issuing government, at a time when the economy was restricted to delivery of the essentials to locked-down 'non-essential' workers who could no longer earn an income due to the lockdowns.

Quote:
Now all you have to do is convince those for whom it is sit down money, to actually do "appropriate work", and to define what that actuaaly is. Roll Eyes

As soon as you place definitions someone will trty to find a workaround. Experts be damned. Wink


eg, Burnham is being forced to face up to the real issue: where is the money coming from?"

(Daily Mail)

"Asked how he would tackle welfare spending, he said: ‘I'm not going to go with the crude cuts to benefit levels that then just put people who are struggling in even worse poverty, and that often creates the backlash, and understandably so.’

Instead, he said he would focus on reforming the education system, offering work placements to young people and building council homes to reduce the number of ‘neets’ – young people not in education, employment or training.


Which will require increasing government spending; he has 2 options: increase taxes or authorize the treasury to fund the above programs.

Quote:
And pay the tradesman their share, we wouldn't want anything else. Ah well there goes the cost of housing again. Grin Grin Grin Grin


Houses are already unaffordable and builders are going broke - unnecessarily when government could employ tradesmen for free, or tax the public to pay for the tradesmen and materials.... your choice (see the Burnham comment above).


Quote:
So which taxes are refressive? Fuel tax? It is a cost to the worker. GST? That is also a cost to the worker. Cool


1. Taxation which enables wealthy people to escape paying taxes is regressive...google Gabriel Zucman for details of the quantum of the problem ( = many $billions of lost  taxes), and the solutions.


Quote:
Is that ALL experts and economists, or just the chosen few. Cool


Those who are not driven by their (unconscious) reptilians brains (like you), and who recognize Oz could eliminate poverty in a decade ie house clothe feed and employ everyone, because the necessary resources are avaiialble.   

Quote:
You still haven't given any figures as to what these NET resources are. I believe in figures, figures that have actulaay been shown to be true, unlike the Snowy2.0 scheme. Cool


Your error: you still conflate money with resources.

So, Snowy 2 will take longer to build than originally planned?
Doesn't matter, the green transition will take time, the essentials are the resources needed to complete the project.

Re calculating the 'cost' of, say, a million public housing units:

(google)

"The average cost to build a new house in Australia sits at $443,422 to $492,410 (excluding land, site preparation, and landscaping). Out of this total construction budget, materials make up roughly 40% to 50% ($177,000 – $246,000), while labour accounts for approximately 35% to 40% ($155,000 – $197,000). The remaining 10% to 20% of the budget covers builder margins, council permits, and compliance

So... c. $200k worth of materials, times a million: c. $200 billiion, to be spent over - say - 10 years.

Note: Over the last decade, Australia (Oz) has built approximately 1.8 million new homes.

That means Oz has [b]c. double the resources[/b] needed to build a million public housing units in a decade.

Quote:
There yo go again, failing to show your proof and then labelling me as the one at fault, using emotion rather than logic. Roll Eyes


We are now drilling down into the real issues  (ie, money versus resources), but your unconscious reptiiian brain continues to insist on seeing scarcity when and where  there is none.

Quote:
You really don't understand. Poverty will always exist, despite, not because of government. Each person is an individual, each individual makes their own choices in life. Some live for the now, some live for the future. Individuals are not an homogenous blob. Cool
 

The Neanderthal creed.

Whereas Musk recently mused (re the coming AI revolution):  "work will be optional and money irrelevant...."; contrasting your unconscious (instinct-driven) reptilian brain with his visionary, conscious cortex brain.   

Quote:
And that neatly sidesteps the question. Did she say that the majority of voters were these "disaffected battlers"? Your claim, back it up. Cool


Not side-stepping the question: she's seeking the votes of the battlers who have been abandoned by mainstream politicians. She knows she's in with a chance, given widespread disatisfaction with mainstream politicians.

 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120602
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #137 - Jul 3rd, 2026 at 6:01pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:35pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:32pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:04pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 3:22pm:
The question I would ask Pauline is where will she get our workforce from if she stops immigration?


Her reply would be: "Please explain".

She's a clueless, racist POS.




https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/ef/9f/84/ef9f8451cb6ebd220df99ee0c625ee0a.j...


Hanson is a racist POS.

If I ever see her grave, I will definitely piss on it.

(That'll probably give Frank a hard-on)




...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Daves2017
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3374
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #138 - Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm
 
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.

Having a different opinion about people of different races and backgrounds and religion isn’t “ racism “.

We are all individuals who have our views in life shaped by our experiences in life.

Some good and bad and the majority of life is just meh.

In this country we are lucky that we are entitled to “ fair “ speech.

Free has long since gone.

Simply saying One Nation is for racism is about as clever as saying that all politicians are narcissistic.

You can’t label people just because it suits yourself.

I’m not a fan of One Nation but I understand why people are turning to it and support their right to vote however they like.

Rather than dismiss their opinions I engage and listen to why they have chosen to support a hard right wing party and ideology.

Without exception so far it’s always been about the state the country is in and disgust and disdain for our current two political parties.

Laws regarding hate speech are quite strict in Australia.

To date Pauline Hanson hasn’t been charged with breaking any of them so clearly not a racist in public.

She is entitled to “ fair “ speech regardless if you like what she’s saying or not.

If you don’t like it, do what I do, don’t vote for her.

Back to top
 

Win or die?

Tomorrow we fight!
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 153784
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #139 - Jul 3rd, 2026 at 10:05pm
 
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm:
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.


You've GOT to be kidding   Shocked
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21099
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #140 - Jul 3rd, 2026 at 11:09pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
Until everyone can support themselves  - like you and me,  who have been employed for most of our working lives.


Even those that don't want to work? And don't tell us no-one is like that. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
Free for the recipients of the rescue package, but not for the government; how many times do I have to tell you the rescue package should also have been free for the currency-issuing government, at a time when the economy was restricted to delivery of the essentials to locked-down 'non-essential' workers who could no longer earn an income due to the lockdowns.


And because you don't need taxpayers it is free for them as well. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
eg, Burnham is being forced to face up to the real issue: where is the money coming from?"


And that doesn't even go close to answering the question. But that doesn't agree with your mantra. Cool

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
Which will require increasing government spending; he has 2 options: increase taxes or authorize the treasury to fund the above programs.


Nothing to do with a fair wage or sit down money. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
Houses are already unaffordable and builders are going broke - unnecessarily when government could employ tradesmen for free, or tax the public to pay for the tradesmen and materials.... your choice (see the Burnham comment above).


Employ tradesmen for free? That is so stupid, even from you. If the tradesmen are free, how do they live, they have expenses. Or tax the public more? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
1. Taxation which enables wealthy people to escape paying taxes is regressive...


Nope.  AI: "Examples include sales taxes, excise taxes on items like tobacco or alcohol, and user fees such as tolls or parking charges." and fuel taxes of course. Wink

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
Those who are not driven by their (unconscious) reptilians brains (like you), and who recognize Oz could eliminate poverty in a decade ie house clothe feed and employ everyone, because the necessary resources are avaiialble.   


So you say. But you admit you don't have the figures. And there you go with the epithets again, another losing argument for you. Cool

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
Your error: you still conflate money with resources.


Resources do have a monetary value, if they didn't the government couldn't issue money. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
So, Snowy 2 will take longer to build than originally planned?
Doesn't matter, the green transition will take time, the essentials are the resources needed to complete the project.

Re calculating the 'cost' of, say, a million public housing units:


So how many houses would 12 billion build? Wink

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
So... c. $200k worth of materials, times a million: c. $200 billiion, to be spent over - say - 10 years.


So you are not going to pay the builders, tradesmen etc. well done you. Cool

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
That means Oz has c. double the resources needed to build a million public housing units in a decade.


Trades people are a resource. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
We are now drilling down into the real issues  (ie, money versus resources), but your unconscious reptiiian brain continues to insist on seeing scarcity when and where  there is none.


Back to the epithets again. Money is a resource. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
Whereas Musk recently mused (re the coming AI revolution):  "work will be optional and money irrelevant...."; contrasting your unconscious (instinct-driven) reptilian brain with his visionary, conscious cortex brain.   


Ah so no-one wil have to work, we will just have sit down money, sit in a circle and chant "kumbayah". Roll Eyes

And Musk knows what about AI? Or does he employ people who know about AI, which while it may be artificial is far from intelligent. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 5:53pm:
Not side-stepping the question: she's seeking the votes of the battlers who have been abandoned by mainstream politicians. She knows she's in with a chance, given widespread disatisfaction with mainstream politicians.


And still sidestepping the question. Where did she say the majorty of voters were battlers? Shocked
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Daves2017
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3374
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #141 - Jul 3rd, 2026 at 11:16pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 10:05pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm:
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.


You've GOT to be kidding   Shocked



Perhaps we are comparing lemons ( one nation 😎) to strawberries?
My definition of racism is clearly different to yours and the new Labor government “ hate speech only fair speech “ laws.

Just because their ideology offends you and I doesn’t automatically make them evil people.

It’s not as black and white as you claim it to be.

There are multiple shades of grey in between.
Back to top
 

Win or die?

Tomorrow we fight!
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36398
Gender: female
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #142 - Jul 4th, 2026 at 7:55am
 
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 11:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 10:05pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm:
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.


You've GOT to be kidding   Shocked



Perhaps we are comparing lemons ( one nation 😎) to strawberries?
My definition of racism is clearly different to yours and the new Labor government “ hate speech only fair speech “ laws.

Just because their ideology offends you and I doesn’t automatically make them evil people.

It’s not as black and white as you claim it to be.

There are multiple shades of grey in between.



Do you think demanding a monoculture from a position of potential power is potentially racist?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 153784
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #143 - Jul 4th, 2026 at 8:03am
 
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 11:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 10:05pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm:
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.


You've GOT to be kidding   Shocked



Perhaps we are comparing lemons ( one nation 😎) to strawberries?
My definition of racism is clearly different to yours ...


You can't make up your own definitions.

There's one definition of 'racism' and Pauline Hanson is racist.

No ifs and no buts?

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58997
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #144 - Jul 4th, 2026 at 8:58am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4th, 2026 at 8:03am:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 11:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 10:05pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm:
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.


You've GOT to be kidding   Shocked



Perhaps we are comparing lemons ( one nation 😎) to strawberries?
My definition of racism is clearly different to yours ...


You can't make up your own definitions.

There's one definition of 'racism' and Pauline Hanson is racist.

No ifs and no buts?


And what IS that definition?
Yours. You can make up your own definition coz you are special.
Detail? Er... Pauline is wacist and.... that's it!!  Yay!
Special Ed creepy liar has reasoned under his own ridiculously dim, flickering lights!  No ifs and no buts, don't you know. Oh, yes
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 153784
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #145 - Jul 4th, 2026 at 9:01am
 
Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2026 at 8:58am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4th, 2026 at 8:03am:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 11:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 10:05pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm:
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.


You've GOT to be kidding   Shocked



Perhaps we are comparing lemons ( one nation 😎) to strawberries?
My definition of racism is clearly different to yours ...


You can't make up your own definitions.

There's one definition of 'racism' and Pauline Hanson is racist.

No ifs and no buts?


And what IS that definition?
Yours. You can make up your own definition coz you are special.
Detail? Er... Pauline is wacist and.... that's it!!  Yay!
Special Ed creepy liar has reasoned under his own ridiculously dim, flickering lights!  No ifs and no buts, don't you know. Oh, yes


racism: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.

racist: characterized by or showing prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.


Thus, Pauline Hanson is - by definition - a racist.

No ifs and no buts.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36398
Gender: female
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #146 - Jul 4th, 2026 at 9:06am
 
Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2026 at 8:58am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4th, 2026 at 8:03am:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 11:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 10:05pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm:
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.


You've GOT to be kidding   Shocked



Perhaps we are comparing lemons ( one nation 😎) to strawberries?
My definition of racism is clearly different to yours ...


You can't make up your own definitions.

There's one definition of 'racism' and Pauline Hanson is racist.

No ifs and no buts?


And what IS that definition?
Yours. You can make up your own definition coz you are special.
Detail? Er... Pauline is wacist and.... that's it!!  Yay!
Special Ed creepy liar has reasoned under his own ridiculously dim, flickering lights!  No ifs and no buts, don't you know. Oh, yes



It's really very simple, fruitbat. You're a worthless racist if you judge other people by the colour of their skin or their lineage.

It's not complicated.

It's kinda expected in 2026 that we regard people as individuals, accepting that they are every bit as human as we are and with whom we have far more in common that not.

Simply put, racists divide while those alternately inclined seek to find common ground. It is through he latter that we have become the wonderful multicultural nation we are, and one which the vast majority enjoy.

You are determined to miserable though. It wouldn't be a problem if you'd stop copy and pasting right wing propagandist at us all day, every day. It's all you do, inter-spaced with sneering commas.

Year after year. Amazing.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33491
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #147 - Jul 4th, 2026 at 9:35am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 10:05pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm:
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.


You've GOT to be kidding   Shocked


You have to be kidding the faux outrage - & all you have is racist, racist, racist.

So much worse than the boy who cried wolf.

Piss orf.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33491
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #148 - Jul 4th, 2026 at 9:37am
 
mothra wrote on Jul 4th, 2026 at 7:55am:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 11:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 10:05pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm:
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.


You've GOT to be kidding   Shocked



Perhaps we are comparing lemons ( one nation 😎) to strawberries?
My definition of racism is clearly different to yours and the new Labor government “ hate speech only fair speech “ laws.

Just because their ideology offends you and I doesn’t automatically make them evil people.

It’s not as black and white as you claim it to be.

There are multiple shades of grey in between.



Do you think demanding a monoculture from a position of potential power is potentially racist?


The only ones "demanding" anything are bedwetters like you.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58997
Gender: male
Re: Pauline, Please Explain !
Reply #149 - Jul 4th, 2026 at 10:25am
 
mothra wrote on Jul 4th, 2026 at 9:06am:
Frank wrote on Jul 4th, 2026 at 8:58am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4th, 2026 at 8:03am:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 11:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 10:05pm:
Daves2017 wrote on Jul 3rd, 2026 at 9:45pm:
I don’t believe Pauline or her candidates or the vast majority of their supporters are “racist”.


You've GOT to be kidding   Shocked



Perhaps we are comparing lemons ( one nation 😎) to strawberries?
My definition of racism is clearly different to yours ...


You can't make up your own definitions.

There's one definition of 'racism' and Pauline Hanson is racist.

No ifs and no buts?


And what IS that definition?
Yours. You can make up your own definition coz you are special.
Detail? Er... Pauline is wacist and.... that's it!!  Yay!
Special Ed creepy liar has reasoned under his own ridiculously dim, flickering lights!  No ifs and no buts, don't you know. Oh, yes



It's really very simple, fruitbat. You're a worthless racist if you judge other people by the colour of their skin or their lineage.

It's not complicated.


Well, I do not.

I judge them by their behaviour, values, cultural practices, beliefs, speech, and a million other signs THEY themselves give of their inner life.  Their culture, in a word that encompasses all these things.

The things they have personal control over.  You choose your values, beliefs, the way you speak and present and all the other things that make you an autonomous person. That is what I judge.


It's not complicated, frightbat.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print