lee wrote on May 27^th, 2026 at 2:48pm:


So I told you that the climate was changing naturally, and you responding by asking why I think the climate was not changing naturally, and your explanation was that I didn't parrot some particular line you wanted me to?

Is this coming from some Liberal party handbook where you are not allowed to think for yourself, only to quote responses verbatim?

Quote:


If we emitted more GHG's. Sounds like another stupid question. If I am missing something, try rephrasing it.

Are you coming up with these responses yourself Lee, or copying and pasting them from another discussion or some Liberal party handbook?

Quote:


The point was bleeding obvious, but went way over your head: contrary to your liberal party spin doctoring, actual climate change has been pretty much in line with the mid range IPCC predictions. You can confirm this yourself: simply leave the Liberal party website or whatever moronic echo chamber you are getting your posts from, read the first IPCC predictions yourself, then compare them with the last 40 years of climate data.

How exactly did you think you would encourage me to prove my point by asking me why I believe the opposite of what I posted?

thegreatdivide wrote on May 26^th, 2026 at 2:07pm:


I see no evidence that the Teals have any interest in any of those things.

I think the current budget is awful and will get Labor thrown out.

lee wrote on May 27^th, 2026 at 4:07pm:


I can see your great great grandson surfing the middle of the Nullabore desert still arguing that there is no global warming.

freediver wrote on May 27^th, 2026 at 4:27pm:



You are the one going round in circles. Why? Doesn't your trheory stack up? Emissions went up, the temperature, rainfall etc did not, as postulated by RCP8.5.

freediver wrote on May 27^th, 2026 at 4:46pm:



Nope. They were not.

from Nick Stokes - climate alarmist -



freediver wrote on May 27^th, 2026 at 4:46pm:



It was never plausible. According to AI it required doubling or tripling coal use by mid century.

freediver wrote on May 27^th, 2026 at 4:46pm:



Nope have a look at that graph.

Now when are you going to quote sources for your views, or do you just believe?

freediver wrote on May 28^th, 2026 at 6:56am:

And that is what shows it was not plausible.

freediver wrote on May 28^th, 2026 at 6:56am:


Then perhaps you can tell us what that is? it can't be that coal has had a massive decrease, it is still going up. It can't be because of renewables they only provide about 16% share of energy, up 3% since 2023. And they still rely on coal for backup.