|
Jasin
|
Well, to be serious. I believe that Australian Aborigines are a far flung remnant of possibly a very large people's that populated much of the planet. But not as old as the San Bushman who just headed towards southern Africa, but they spawned the much younger 3 types of classic Caucasoid (wavy hair filament), Mongoloid (straight hair filament) & Negroid (curly hair filament). Though it seems the Mongoloid & Negroid were more isolated. Papua's Melanesians are more Negroid (& Denisovan), much like the Tasmanian aborigines were. But the later Murrayans & recent (12,000 yrs ago) Carpentarians are more Caucasoid. So to the Ainu of Japan. White European Caucasoid likely came from this older group.
As for Gobleki Tepe? Well here's the cruncher. There are 32 abstract symbols that appear consistently all around the world in discovered Cave Art. 12 of these symbols are consistently exact. So basically, long ago and for over 100,000 years - it seems there was one unifying culture of Sapiens painting the same symbols from Sahul, to Southern Africa, Asia, Europe & Asia along with Middle-East. So I believe that yes, Gobleki Tepe could have been created by the descendants who followed the same Symbolism that their Ancestors used, but Australian Aborigines didn't create Gobleki directly. They're just a remnant of that first global culture that developed in a world still occupied by Neanderthal. Denisovan , Ophiran (San) and even Homo Erectus )which existed for over 2 million years all over the world except Oceania & the America's. I bet Erectus, even made it to Australia. They were exceptional tool makers and rafting wouldn't have been beyond them with remains found in Indonesia.
So Aborigine 'ancestors', let alone everyone else's- made Gobleki.
...I mean, what else was there to do in such an empty boring place?
|