Jasin wrote on Jul 5^th, 2026 at 2:36pm:


Yeah - but hunter gatherer 'territory' also caused a lot of conflicts.. with an agrarian society I suppose it all became more entrenched and firmed into very specific plots of land etc.  Survival - and based on instinct - something we can never rid ourselves entirely of.

Look at Western women these days of 'liberation' - incredible hoarders of as much resources as they can lay their hands on - completely unnecessary in a time of relative plenty - and the controllers are going along with it.

You can take the girl out of the desperate fringe living hand-to-mouth - but you can never take the desperate hand-to-mouth living out of the girl.  Of course they cast it as some noble crusade or jihad - a holy war... but it's essentially primitive and a sad reflection on women generally.. barely a shade above the animals... (aaaargh) ..

Neo Abo

Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Jul 8^th, 2026 at 7:54am:


Quoi?   

Sounds pretty misogynistic to me. 

Jasin wrote on Jul 30^th, 2026 at 12:51pm:


Lol, that sure must've been one helluva knockback he got in the past!   

Let us then look at the example of a 'woman' appointed as a government minister.. appointed in this example to watch over wildlife both native and imported.... and let us consider her ways in the context of her position on The Bridge (between ape and super-ape)....

Given that her 'education' has been that of recent years  meaning it was of AI 2.0 - AI 2.0 being either or both of Autistic Intellect or Arbitrarily Inserted in houses of learning these days – it becomes easy to view impartially what drives her in perpetrating and endorsing barbarous actions without remorse or even thought.

First of all – AI 2.0 learning in houses of education dictates that one only listen to those of a like mind these days – that one functions as much as possible and by force if necessary in an 'echo chamber'.  Every other view is nothing more than that of some uneducated hill billy who is addicted to right wing radio and television shock jocks etc.

So – in considering undertaking the monstrous idea of massacring – as 'enemies of the state' – harmless horses via heroic aerial gunshot and via proxy poisoning through aerial baiting using a food popular to countless animals both native and imported – carrots – the ONLY 'stakeholders' permitted any input to this idea are very carefully chosen and screened.  Only those who already stick to the idea of mass murder are permitted through the doors, and are then paid via 'consulting fees' and similar back door ways.

None dare call that corruption, and upon questioning, she can point to the 'consultation' undertaken before the mass murders began.  Everything undertaken by Das Reich was legal...... (as was commented on re the German Nazis) .. easy when YOU get to make the laws ....

Next – ordinary people become aware of the brutal and heartless massacres taking place behind locked gates in what are euphemistically called 'national parks' – parks for ALL the people and the nation – and yet considered by those appointed and paid to operate them on that basis to be THEIR private domain – their personal fiefdom, over which they alone may assert Feudal style control and make arbitrary decisions about the Right of entry etc.

Thus those now viewed as a form of Social Brumby – a Mustang or P-51 inserted into the balance in the Hot Air Wars Over The Clash of European Civilisations which threatens to upset the apple cart of massacre behind closed gates (or the one used to give out poisoned apples to horses etc or perhaps more appropriately the pork barrel cart) - can be arbitrarily singled out for exclusion from the very zones they wish to enter – as citizens of Der Stadt with a right of entry short of criminal/illegal actions and behaviour – to view the monstrosities of massacre being perpetrated in their name and that of the Reich.

Those doing the exclusions are ordered by the aforementioned 'woman' 'government minister'.

Clearly then this type is a NAZI (Nowaday Artificially Zapped Intellect) operating extermination zones, and the Mustangs seeking entry into NAZI space to contest vast crime are viewed as a danger to Das Reich and das Wahre Volk, and are clearly enemies of Das Schtaat.

Nowhere could there be a more clear example of someone trapped, largely by official education and thus a form of intellectual Nazi, on the bridge between ape and super-ape.... and set to appear at the bottom of the Human level with an educational lobotomy in place that stipulates ape behaviour at its lowest.

https://quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/aborigines/none-so-blind-as-those-who-refu...

"NONE SO BLIND AS THOSE WHO REFUSE TO SEE

Gary Johns - Quadrant Online,
August 06, 2026

Noel Pearson is at it again with another bright idea that denies reality. The man who wants self-determination but does not trust native-title holders with cash (an idea he had while working for Twiggy Forrest), who gave Queensland the failed Family Responsibility Commission and Australia the Voice, now wants the Commonwealth to take over remote communities and ‘guarantee’ education and work for every resident. The editor-in-chief needs to think deeply about why The Australian published Noel’s speech at the Garma Festival and why Paige Taylor keeps reporting his musings.

Pearson knows full well that the Commonwealth walked away from funding homelands (a subset of remote communities) about 20 years ago.

As it happens, there is a guarantee in education. By law, for example, the Queensland government must ensure that every child attends school until age 16 or Grade 10. Despite this law, the attendance ‘level’ is less than 10% for Aboriginal students in remote Australia across years 1-10 when 90% attendance is deemed the minimum to learn enough to pass. The guarantee does not work because no one wants to call out the fact that policy is dealing with intergenerationally dependent people who have learned not to take responsibility for their actions. This used to be Pearson’s signature cry.

Unfortunately, Pearson fails to understand human behaviour. His Commission was a bold attempt to enforce responsibility. For twenty years, the Commission enforced rules requiring parents to send their children to school. For fifteen years, statistics were collected in some of the communities where the Commission operated. Attendance rates, hospital admissions for assault-related conditions, and child-protection notifications changed very little. After ten years, the Queensland government stopped publishing the statistics; after a further five years, it stopped counting. Sadly, the results have been modest and very costly, which is why they stopped counting, but not funding.

The Commission’s failure proves that context is everything. People living in remote communities with no enduring economic base do not expect to work. Make-work programs, all of which are ‘guaranteed’ by one government or another, reinforce the temporary and artificial nature of this ‘work’. For example, following two recent High Court decisions, 73 remote communities in the Northern Territory are suing the CEO of Northern Territory Housing for failing to keep their rental houses in a reasonable condition. Goodness knows the CEO and all governments have tried to guarantee a house, but at $1 million per house and with tenants who have no sense of responsibility, the hope is forlorn.

There is no future in these communities. The average unemployment rate for Aborigines in these communities is 27%. This very high unemployment is coupled with very low labour force participation rates. The participation rate in the labour force is 54% Australia-wide and as low as 7% in some communities. The only jobs are in local government and schools. These are guaranteed make-work jobs, either leaning on a shovel or sitting at the back of the class, minding your own child."

(continued below)