Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 7:02am:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 6:55am:
That doesn't change the facts about whether unions cause unemployment Bobby. It is just emotional manipulation - the unions' core business. Hate scabs. Hate your boss. Love your 'coworker' as long as they are your equal and pay their dues. Get a warm and fuzzy feeling when you hand over a chunk of your salary to the unions. Ignore the nagging doubt in the back of your mind about whether unions might be doing more harm than good, and whether it might cost you your job one day. Don't think, just feel.
But who is going to be there for them during the next round of retrenchments for:
under performing staff,
staff who take too many smoko breaks,
staff who don't like working free overtime,
staff who complain too much,
staff who are looking a bit old and tired,
females who get so fat that people can't stand looking at them,
staff who smell or who fart all the time.
Not the unions. If they get retrenched, they stop paying their dues. They might even become a scab. They are literally funding the organisation that will kick them when they are down. Sure, they might hold their hand and try to make them feel better - that is the product they paid for. But chances are, the union caused them to lose their job and will cause their inability to find another one.
Bobby, why did you say that unions "only sometimes" cause unemployment? When you say it was something to do with your heart, does that mean you were being irrational and the words have no real meaning, other than to make you feel better?