Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: The Federal Government budget for 2026 is

Great    
  2 (14.3%)
Good    
  2 (14.3%)
Average    
  3 (21.4%)
Bad    
  1 (7.1%)
Terrible    
  6 (42.9%)




Total votes: 14
« Last Modified by: Vic on: May 13th, 2026 at 7:48pm »

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print
Really? I have to start the budget discussion? (Read 2957 times)
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20773
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #90 - May 20th, 2026 at 7:56pm
 
Dnarever wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 7:42pm:
Non fixed Trusts make up over 80% of the million trusts (over 800,000 of them) testamentary trusts are about 1% of that number.



And I am arguing about the non fixed testamentary trusts, which you insist will not have a bearing on minors or those with other disabilities. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58288
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #91 - May 20th, 2026 at 8:23pm
 
Dnarever wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 1:41pm:
Frank wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 11:47am:
Dnarever wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 10:07am:
Bobby. wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 9:25am:
I never heard of a testamentary trust until a few days ago.     Embarrassed

Could I have beaten the tax man?   Undecided


Yes - If you are both wealthy and dead (just joking). No this is less than 1% of trusts.

How this works is if you say put $2M into this type of trust funded by a death in this case. You can distribute that money at say $18K per year tax free. Because that $18.2K it the lower limit for tax and this falls under the tax starting limit there is no tax on the person who recieves the trust. It also means that anything they earn on top is taxed straight away. What the chage does is to tax at 30% any profit made on the lump sum to be paid by the  Trustee. (only the interest is taxed).

How this works:

Example: You have 4 children peing paid by the trust and a non working wife. The trust pays them $25k each.

18,200 is the current min tax threshold. That means that each recipiant would pay about $1,088 in tax.

That is income total for all 5 people  = $125,000.00
Total tax for all 5 people = $5440.00

Not a bad deal I can see why a labor gov would want to end that and why a Lib Gov wouldn't.

Yes Bobby you can do this if you have a spare $1,500,000 dollars or so laying around doing nothing but avoiding taxes.


It is 5 different people. Why would you treat them as a single recipient when you cannot similarly pool your income while you are alive and have $18k treated as tax free for every member of your household?

Avoiding to pay tax you do not have to is common sense. Not the same as tax evasion of tax you are required by law to pay.

As Packer explained, governments are not spending our money so well that we want to give them extra.


You do give them extra Frank - rich people not paying any tax means that you have to pay more - a lot more. Maybe I am incorrectly assuming that you do pay tax?

Yor really believe that rich people should not need to pay tax and that tax is only for the people who are poor and / or have average incomes ?

You really believe that multy million dollar funds should be able to 100% avoid tax on profit and at the same time fund disipersment from these funds should also be able to be managed to be tax free literally for decades. This example would ultimately disperse millions of dollars virtually tax free.

Wealth accumulated through legal, taxable enterprise.

Why tax it AGAIN just because you died?

Why is death now a taxable 'activity'?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Marla
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A joint a day keeps the
MAGA away

Posts: 14834
Colorado
Gender: female
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #92 - May 20th, 2026 at 11:14pm
 
Bobby. wrote on May 13th, 2026 at 12:15am:



Just like you kangaroo rooters stealing my healthcare
Back to top
 

I like takin' Tuinal. It keeps me edgy and mean. I'm a teenage schizoid I'm a teenage dope fiend
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 119847
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #93 - Yesterday at 10:56am
 
Marla wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 11:14pm:
Bobby. wrote on May 13th, 2026 at 12:15am:



Just like you kangaroo rooters stealing my healthcare



You're disgusting.     Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15312
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #94 - Yesterday at 12:25pm
 
It's like the Labor "brains trust" just can't help themselves ...

They inevitably come up with some stupid economic self-destruct notion.

Last time it was Bill Shorten and Chris Bowen.

This time it is Albo and  Jim Chalmers.


...

"Destruct sequence 1, code 1-1 A."
"Destruct sequence 2, code 1-1 A-2B."
"Destruct sequence 3, code 1 B-2B-3."
"Code zero zero zero. Destruct. Zero."


Grin

Back to top
 

The 2025 election WAS a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 61687
Here
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #95 - Yesterday at 6:24pm
 
Frank wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 8:23pm:
Dnarever wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 1:41pm:
Frank wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 11:47am:
Dnarever wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 10:07am:
Bobby. wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 9:25am:
I never heard of a testamentary trust until a few days ago.     Embarrassed

Could I have beaten the tax man?   Undecided


Yes - If you are both wealthy and dead (just joking). No this is less than 1% of trusts.

How this works is if you say put $2M into this type of trust funded by a death in this case. You can distribute that money at say $18K per year tax free. Because that $18.2K it the lower limit for tax and this falls under the tax starting limit there is no tax on the person who recieves the trust. It also means that anything they earn on top is taxed straight away. What the chage does is to tax at 30% any profit made on the lump sum to be paid by the  Trustee. (only the interest is taxed).

How this works:

Example: You have 4 children peing paid by the trust and a non working wife. The trust pays them $25k each.

18,200 is the current min tax threshold. That means that each recipiant would pay about $1,088 in tax.

That is income total for all 5 people  = $125,000.00
Total tax for all 5 people = $5440.00

Not a bad deal I can see why a labor gov would want to end that and why a Lib Gov wouldn't.

Yes Bobby you can do this if you have a spare $1,500,000 dollars or so laying around doing nothing but avoiding taxes.


It is 5 different people. Why would you treat them as a single recipient when you cannot similarly pool your income while you are alive and have $18k treated as tax free for every member of your household?

Avoiding to pay tax you do not have to is common sense. Not the same as tax evasion of tax you are required by law to pay.

As Packer explained, governments are not spending our money so well that we want to give them extra.


You do give them extra Frank - rich people not paying any tax means that you have to pay more - a lot more. Maybe I am incorrectly assuming that you do pay tax?

Yor really believe that rich people should not need to pay tax and that tax is only for the people who are poor and / or have average incomes ?

You really believe that multy million dollar funds should be able to 100% avoid tax on profit and at the same time fund disipersment from these funds should also be able to be managed to be tax free literally for decades. This example would ultimately disperse millions of dollars virtually tax free.

Wealth accumulated through legal, taxable enterprise.

Why tax it AGAIN just because you died?

Why is death now a taxable 'activity'?



99% of these trusts relate in no way to anyones death and the few that Do 1% only do so in the same way as many other taxes apply to the people who inherit the asset and have to pay forward taxation on the profit generated by what they own the same as any inheritance. If you inherit property you pay tax in the property appreciation between when you took posetion of the property and when you sell it, it works the same with investments you pay tax on the profits during the time you own the investments. This is not death tax. All it does is to make sure that very wealthy people have to pay a small and reasonable amount of tax on their investments.

Quote:
Why tax it AGAIN just because you died?


The investment isn't taxed again - this is about tax on the investments interest (current Profit from the current financial year. It is not applied to current trusts only new ones and anyone with a current trust of this type has the option to easily reformat their trust.

Dear Frank here you once again continue to show that you never do any research and mostly don't know what you are talking about.

Quote:
Wealth accumulated through legal, taxable enterprise.


An unfair loop hole that is justifyably being closed.

Quote:
Why tax it AGAIN just because you died?


This is incorrect it isn't being taxed again - the money taxed is current profit that was never previously taxed the capital in the investment isn't taxed at all.

Quote:
Why is death now a taxable 'activity'?


The tax is applied to the current living person or entity who makes the profit. It sikmply isn't a death tax in any way.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 6:33pm by Dnarever »  
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 61687
Here
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #96 - Yesterday at 6:35pm
 
Captain Nemo wrote Yesterday at 12:25pm:
It's like the Labor "brains trust" just can't help themselves ...

They inevitably come up with some stupid economic self-destruct notion.

Last time it was Bill Shorten and Chris Bowen.

This time it is Albo and  Jim Chalmers.


https://i.imgur.com/D8fxgkK.jpeg

"Destruct sequence 1, code 1-1 A."
"Destruct sequence 2, code 1-1 A-2B."
"Destruct sequence 3, code 1 B-2B-3."
"Code zero zero zero. Destruct. Zero."


Grin



Sorry Captain but did you say something here ? I can find no meaning, I have no idea what you are talking about ?

Is this about the budget in general or something in it ? I do agree its a very poor budget and that the dumbo's shot themself in the foot for no reason. Really why would Labor produce a nasty Liberal type budget ?

There is probably no better way for them to be thrown out of office that to attack elderly Australians.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20773
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #97 - Yesterday at 7:17pm
 
Dnarever wrote Yesterday at 6:24pm:
f you inherit property you pay tax in the property appreciation between when you took posetion of the property and when you sell it, it works the same with investments you pay tax on the profits during the time you own the investments.


That must be why they have reinvented indexation on capital gains, to only catch real profits.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58288
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #98 - Yesterday at 8:46pm
 
Dnarever wrote Yesterday at 6:24pm:
Frank wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 8:23pm:
Dnarever wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 1:41pm:
Frank wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 11:47am:
Dnarever wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 10:07am:
Bobby. wrote on May 20th, 2026 at 9:25am:
I never heard of a testamentary trust until a few days ago.     Embarrassed

Could I have beaten the tax man?   Undecided


Yes - If you are both wealthy and dead (just joking). No this is less than 1% of trusts.

How this works is if you say put $2M into this type of trust funded by a death in this case. You can distribute that money at say $18K per year tax free. Because that $18.2K it the lower limit for tax and this falls under the tax starting limit there is no tax on the person who recieves the trust. It also means that anything they earn on top is taxed straight away. What the chage does is to tax at 30% any profit made on the lump sum to be paid by the  Trustee. (only the interest is taxed).

How this works:

Example: You have 4 children peing paid by the trust and a non working wife. The trust pays them $25k each.

18,200 is the current min tax threshold. That means that each recipiant would pay about $1,088 in tax.

That is income total for all 5 people  = $125,000.00
Total tax for all 5 people = $5440.00

Not a bad deal I can see why a labor gov would want to end that and why a Lib Gov wouldn't.

Yes Bobby you can do this if you have a spare $1,500,000 dollars or so laying around doing nothing but avoiding taxes.


It is 5 different people. Why would you treat them as a single recipient when you cannot similarly pool your income while you are alive and have $18k treated as tax free for every member of your household?

Avoiding to pay tax you do not have to is common sense. Not the same as tax evasion of tax you are required by law to pay.

As Packer explained, governments are not spending our money so well that we want to give them extra.


You do give them extra Frank - rich people not paying any tax means that you have to pay more - a lot more. Maybe I am incorrectly assuming that you do pay tax?

Yor really believe that rich people should not need to pay tax and that tax is only for the people who are poor and / or have average incomes ?

You really believe that multy million dollar funds should be able to 100% avoid tax on profit and at the same time fund disipersment from these funds should also be able to be managed to be tax free literally for decades. This example would ultimately disperse millions of dollars virtually tax free.

Wealth accumulated through legal, taxable enterprise.

Why tax it AGAIN just because you died?

Why is death now a taxable 'activity'?



99% of these trusts relate in no way to anyones death and the few that Do 1% only do so in the same way as many other taxes apply to the people who inherit the asset and have to pay forward taxation on the profit generated by what they own the same as any inheritance. If you inherit property you pay tax in the property appreciation between when you took posetion of the property and when you sell it, it works the same with investments you pay tax on the profits during the time you own the investments. This is not death tax. All it does is to make sure that very wealthy people have to pay a small and reasonable amount of tax on their investments.

Quote:
Why tax it AGAIN just because you died?


The investment isn't taxed again - this is about tax on the investments interest (current Profit from the current financial year. It is not applied to current trusts only new ones and anyone with a current trust of this type has the option to easily reformat their trust.

Dear Frank here you once again continue to show that you never do any research and mostly don't know what you are talking about.

Quote:
Wealth accumulated through legal, taxable enterprise.


An unfair loop hole that is justifyably being closed.

Quote:
Why tax it AGAIN just because you died?


This is incorrect it isn't being taxed again - the money taxed is current profit that was never previously taxed the capital in the investment isn't taxed at all.

Quote:
Why is death now a taxable 'activity'?


The tax is applied to the current living person or entity who makes the profit. It sikmply isn't a death tax in any way.

You are doing a lot of slippin' and slidin' there, duckwit.

'Death in this case' tax free thershold, lum sum taxed at 30 %, but only the interest - a duck on ice, yeah but no but.
Glad I don't have to rely on you for ANY kind of advice, Muddy Waters.
Very Albo-esque.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 15312
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #99 - Yesterday at 10:58pm
 
Dnarever wrote Yesterday at 6:35pm:
Captain Nemo wrote Yesterday at 12:25pm:
It's like the Labor "brains trust" just can't help themselves ...

They inevitably come up with some stupid economic self-destruct notion.

Last time it was Bill Shorten and Chris Bowen.

This time it is Albo and  Jim Chalmers.


https://i.imgur.com/D8fxgkK.jpeg

"Destruct sequence 1, code 1-1 A."
"Destruct sequence 2, code 1-1 A-2B."
"Destruct sequence 3, code 1 B-2B-3."
"Code zero zero zero. Destruct. Zero."


Grin



Sorry Captain but did you say something here ? I can find no meaning, I have no idea what you are talking about ?

Is this about the budget in general or something in it ? I do agree its a very poor budget and that the dumbo's shot themself in the foot for no reason. Really why would Labor produce a nasty Liberal type budget ?

There is probably no better way for them to be thrown out of office that to attack elderly Australians.


Yes, the budget in general and the CGT changes in particular which seem to have been very poorly thought through.

They are going to harm the younger generations rather than help.

Shorten and Bowen had the Franking Credits fiasco, and this time it is the CGT fiasco.

Poor old Labor ... they always stuff it up.


Back to top
 

The 2025 election WAS a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20617
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #100 - Today at 12:22am
 
Lest we forget it was Labor with Paul Keating who gave us capital gains tax.

He also inflicted fronge benefits tax on us.

Labor piss away taxpayers money like drunken sailors so they have to keep increasing taxes to pay for their waste.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Daves2017
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3289
Gender: male
Re: Really? I have to start the budget discussion?
Reply #101 - Today at 9:03am
 
Why didn’t this budget target government waste instead of simply raising taxes?
Back to top
 

After weeks of poor press regarding Albo ( and Scomo) poor management of fuel reserves and desperate for a major distraction.
Federal Police arrest Ben ( war criminal) Smith.
What Amazing timing?
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print