Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
rfk - jr (Read 810 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 152660
Gender: male
Re: rfk - jr
Reply #45 - May 15th, 2026 at 2:50pm
 
lee wrote on May 15th, 2026 at 2:46pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 15th, 2026 at 2:12pm:
Ah, no.



Ah yes. He tries. Even though science can never be "proven". Or perhaps you would have liked me to use the word "show"? Grin Grin Grin Grin

But it was good that you conceded the rest. Wink


"A scientist has a theory, he expounds on that theory, he tries to prove support that theory with observations."

You're welcome.
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28796
Gender: male
Re: rfk - jr
Reply #46 - May 15th, 2026 at 4:05pm
 
lee wrote on May 15th, 2026 at 2:08pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 15th, 2026 at 7:15am:
If the vast majority of scientists say cancer is bad and a minority say cancer is good, then the scientific community is going to go with the consensus of the majority.



Now having made that statement, please show where one scientist has said cancer was good.

But perhaps you can include a single subject like the consensus of climate change which is true. Demonstrably true...ie by observation. Roll Eyes

25 medical consensus that were wrong.

https://imahealth.org/25-times-medical-consensus-had-to-be-rethought/



Wow, you are stupid! I was making up a simple example. Obviously I don’t think cancer is good, nor do any scientists that I know of. I was just using cancer as an example to illustrate my point! My goodness, you MAGA morons are dumb!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20765
Gender: male
Re: rfk - jr
Reply #47 - May 15th, 2026 at 4:30pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 15th, 2026 at 4:05pm:
Obviously I don’t think cancer is good, nor do any scientists that I know of. I was just using cancer as an example to illustrate my point!



So you don't have a salient point. Thanks for that. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58272
Gender: male
Re: rfk - jr
Reply #48 - May 18th, 2026 at 4:03pm
 
Marla wrote on May 13th, 2026 at 1:02am:
Sprintcyclist wrote on May 12th, 2026 at 12:21pm:
wants flavoured vapes back on the market, 



MAGA shitheads have been running endless ads thanking ol orange fatty that "people not have a choice to quit smoking by...vaping...? WTF? This is American taboo industry propaganda to get kids smoking since sales have dwindled among America's youth killing themselves with cigarettes. Maggie Mae Fish explains it so much better:




U.S. — Teenagers across the nation are discovering a hip new alternative to vaping, called "smoking cigarettes."

Thousands of youngsters are beginning to ditch their vape pens for packs of Marlboro, attracted by the more sophisticated look and flavor of real cigarettes.

"These are such a cool invention," said local teenager Hayden Bennett, lighting up a loosie. "It looks way more hardcore than a dumb pen. Strawberry-flavored junk is so lame."

Sales of cigarettes have spiked, partly spurred by increased concern of the health risks of vaping. "I heard vaping could cause throat and lung cancer. I'm going to try to wean myself off by using cigarettes. It seems like a much more natural alternative."

At publishing time, teenagers had reportedly discovered a cool new alternative to delta-8 gummies called "alcohol."
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28796
Gender: male
Re: rfk - jr
Reply #49 - May 18th, 2026 at 5:37pm
 
lee wrote on May 15th, 2026 at 4:30pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 15th, 2026 at 4:05pm:
Obviously I don’t think cancer is good, nor do any scientists that I know of. I was just using cancer as an example to illustrate my point!



So you don't have a salient point. Thanks for that. Wink


Not surprised you'd miss the point completely.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20765
Gender: male
Re: rfk - jr
Reply #50 - May 18th, 2026 at 5:57pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 18th, 2026 at 5:37pm:
Not surprised you'd miss the point completely. 


On the other hand I am not surprised you thought you had a point.
(It took you that long to think up an answer?)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58272
Gender: male
Re: rfk - jr
Reply #51 - May 18th, 2026 at 8:43pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 18th, 2026 at 5:37pm:
lee wrote on May 15th, 2026 at 4:30pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on May 15th, 2026 at 4:05pm:
Obviously I don’t think cancer is good, nor do any scientists that I know of. I was just using cancer as an example to illustrate my point!



So you don't have a salient point. Thanks for that. Wink


Not surprised you'd miss the point completely.  Roll Eyes

Your point was that you are an idiot: you invented 'scientists who say 'cancer is good" in order to demonstrate that you understand nothing. You parade your incomprehension and idiotic invention as if it was something to be understood, ie your 'point'.


Tendentious idiocy. No wonder you are totally TDS.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print