MeisterEckhart wrote on May 12
th, 2026 at 4:05pm:
As I said... it worked.
It worked? really?
MeisterEckhart wrote on May 12
th, 2026 at 4:05pm:
You, as an Australian, would have benefited from royalties..
I have already benefited from royalties. Royalties are not taxes. make up your mind what you want.
MeisterEckhart wrote on May 12
th, 2026 at 4:05pm:
but what are you doing with your 'probablies'? You're fighting Rhinehart and co's fight for them.
And you show you don't do economics at all.
MeisterEckhart wrote on May 12
th, 2026 at 4:05pm:
China is by far and away our largest market with iron ore and other metals...
Whatever extra they'd pay to partially pay for royalties is chicken feed... especially given that there is no reliable alternative to Australian mining products.
You don't read the mining news, do you. Indonesia and a host of others are selling mining products to China. China is already saying Australian iron ore, coal etc are too expensive.
MeisterEckhart wrote on May 12
th, 2026 at 4:05pm:
How petty would a royalty surcharge to partly cover all Australians appear to the Chinese?
Have a look at what China does in the market. Refuse shipments, impose tariifs to stop the supply. You really are a nonsense.
MeisterEckhart wrote on May 12
th, 2026 at 4:05pm:
Even the Chinese couldn't dream up a myth as good as the deals they're in with Australia... Do you think they'd quibble with perfection over a minor increase in prices to help support Australians who number less than one major Chinese city?
Maybe that is why they go to places like Indonesia for supply, coal, cobalt , nickel.