Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Response To CSIRO Funding Pathetic (Read 155 times)
whiteknight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9213
melbourne
Gender: male
Response To CSIRO Funding Pathetic
Apr 29th, 2026 at 5:13am
 
Response to CSIRO funding ‘pathetic’: Greens   Sad
2026-04-28
greens.org.au
A Senate inquiry into the job and program cuts at the CSIRO has today released its final report, exposing a deliberate shift away from public good science at the nation’s leading scientific research agency.

The inquiry revealed the CSIRO is suffering chronic underfunding masked as strategic reform, causing workforce destruction, loss of sovereign capability, and deliberate subversion of climate science.

The Greens are urging the Government to reverse all funding and staffing cuts, commit to increased and ongoing funding for “public good” science, and urgently establish an audit of CSIRO facilities to ensure its sustainability and viability.

Lines attributable to Greens spokesperson for finance, public sector, workplace relations and employment and Senator for South Australia, Barbara Pocock:

“The major parties’ responses to the evidence provided through this inquiry are pathetic. This was an inquiry into “funding and resourcing for the CSIRO” yet neither made a single recommendation to actually increase funding or resourcing. It’s frankly shameful, and our dissenting report calls out their failure.

“Sustained underfunding of CSIRO is actively degrading Australia’s scientific workforce and eroding sovereign capability.

“CSIRO workers are facing relentless uncertainty about their jobs and research. These are highly skilled workers essential to Australia’s scientific future.

“Specialised scientific expertise takes years, often decades, to build. Once lost, it cannot be quickly or easily replaced. Losing their expertise would be a serious blow.

“Australia is not just underfunding science - it is dismantling the workforce and capability needed to confront the defining challenges of this century.

“This is about choices and the Labor Government is choosing to subsidise fossil fuel companies in the midst of a climate crisis over ensuring our nation’s resilience and sovereign capability through essential science.

“Gutting CSIRO is part of a broader process by successive Labor and Coalition Governments to weaken Australia’s public sector.

Lines attributable to Greens spokesperson for Science, Senator Peter Whish-Wilson:

“Evidence to the inquiry makes clear that the challenges facing the CSIRO are the direct consequence of chronic underfunding by governments.

“These funding pressures are driving a shift toward short-term, applied work at the expense of deep, long-term climate science. This is not an incidental outcome, it is a direct consequence of policy and funding choices, and it carries significant national risk.

“The CSIRO has spent decades building the knowledge, infrastructure and skilled workforce needed to model Southern Hemisphere climate systems. This is not something that can simply be outsourced or picked up elsewhere. Rebuilding it would take years of sustained investment and the cuts now underway risk losing it altogether.

“The CSIRO needs additional funding and a new commitment from current and subsequent governments to real increases in the resources available to our premier public science organisation.

“With public good science funding under siege globally, it has never been more important for the Albanese government to invest in the CSIRO.”
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20748
Gender: male
Re: Response To CSIRO Funding Pathetic
Reply #1 - Apr 29th, 2026 at 2:42pm
 
whiteknight wrote on Apr 29th, 2026 at 5:13am:
This was an inquiry into “funding and resourcing for the CSIRO” yet neither made a single recommendation to actually increase funding or resourcing.


perhaps they didn't see a need. Funding generally relies on getting bang for buck. No new science? no new funding.

whiteknight wrote on Apr 29th, 2026 at 5:13am:
“This is about choices and the Labor Government is choosing to subsidise fossil fuel companies in the midst of a climate crisis over ensuring our nation’s resilience and sovereign capability through essential science.


So how do they subsidies fossil fuel? by not taxing them enough?

whiteknight wrote on Apr 29th, 2026 at 5:13am:
These funding pressures are driving a shift toward short-term, applied work at the expense of deep, long-term climate science. This is not an incidental outcome, it is a direct consequence of policy and funding choices, and it carries significant national risk.


Oh climate science. We have been told the science is settled, why fund more?

whiteknight wrote on Apr 29th, 2026 at 5:13am:
“The CSIRO has spent decades building the knowledge, infrastructure and skilled workforce needed to model Southern Hemisphere climate systems. This is not something that can simply be outsourced or picked up elsewhere. Rebuilding it would take years of sustained investment and the cuts now underway risk losing it altogether.


And yet it seems the climate is not responding as it should. Rainfall up, drought down. Models are not observations.

But it seems likely that an El Nino may bring hotter? winter temperatures. Be fraid, be very afraid. Roll Eyes

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/apr/27/weather-australia-el-nino-bom-forecast-winter-dry-hot
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 119700
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Response To CSIRO Funding Pathetic
Reply #2 - Apr 29th, 2026 at 4:30pm
 

There are plenty of stories of people with science degrees and
even PhDs in science who can't find any work in Australia.

Many have to go overseas to obtain employment.   Sad

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print